Lulu Farhana, Fadi Antaki, Farhan Murshed, Hamidah Mahmud, Stephanie L Judd, Pratima Nangia-Makker, Edi Levi, Yingjie Yu, Adhip Pn Majumdar
{"title":"非裔美国人和白种人的肠道微生物群分析和结直肠癌。","authors":"Lulu Farhana, Fadi Antaki, Farhan Murshed, Hamidah Mahmud, Stephanie L Judd, Pratima Nangia-Makker, Edi Levi, Yingjie Yu, Adhip Pn Majumdar","doi":"10.4291/wjgp.v9.i2.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether and to what extent the gut microbiome is involved in regulating racial disparity in colorectal cancer (CRC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients were recruited and experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB), committees of the John D. Dingell VAMC and Wayne State University guidelines. African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) patients were scheduled for an outpatient screening for colonoscopy, and no active malignancy volunteer patients were doubly consented, initially by the gastroenterologist and later by the study coordinator, for participation in the study. The gut microbial communities in colonic effluents from AAs and CAs were examined using 16sRNA profiling, and bacterial identifications were validated by performing SYBR-based Real Time PCR. For metagenomic analysis to characterize the microbial communities, multiple software/tools were used, including Metastats and R statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It is generally accepted that the incidence and mortality of CRC is higher in AAs than in CAs. However, the reason for this disparity is not well understood. We hypothesize that the gut microbiome plays a role in regulating this disparity. Indeed, we found significant differences in species richness and diversity between AAs and CAs. <i>Bacteroidetes</i> was more abundant in AAs than in CAs. In particular, the pro-inflammatory bacteria <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> and <i>Enterobacter</i> species were significantly higher in AAs, whereas probiotic <i>Akkermansia muciniphila</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> were higher in CAs. The polyphyletic <i>Clostridia</i> class showed a divergent pattern, with <i>Clostridium XI</i> elevated in AAs, and <i>Clostridium IV</i>, known for its beneficial function, higher in CAs. Lastly, the AA group had decreased microbial diversity overall in comparison to the CA group. In summary, there were significant differences in pro-inflammatory bacteria and microbial diversity between AA and CA, which may help explain the CRC disparity between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our current investigation, for the first time, demonstrates microbial dysbiosis between AAs and CAs, which could contribute to the racial disparity of CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23760,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology","volume":"9 2","pages":"47-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4291/wjgp.v9.i2.47","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut microbiome profiling and colorectal cancer in African Americans and Caucasian Americans.\",\"authors\":\"Lulu Farhana, Fadi Antaki, Farhan Murshed, Hamidah Mahmud, Stephanie L Judd, Pratima Nangia-Makker, Edi Levi, Yingjie Yu, Adhip Pn Majumdar\",\"doi\":\"10.4291/wjgp.v9.i2.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether and to what extent the gut microbiome is involved in regulating racial disparity in colorectal cancer (CRC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients were recruited and experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB), committees of the John D. Dingell VAMC and Wayne State University guidelines. African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) patients were scheduled for an outpatient screening for colonoscopy, and no active malignancy volunteer patients were doubly consented, initially by the gastroenterologist and later by the study coordinator, for participation in the study. The gut microbial communities in colonic effluents from AAs and CAs were examined using 16sRNA profiling, and bacterial identifications were validated by performing SYBR-based Real Time PCR. For metagenomic analysis to characterize the microbial communities, multiple software/tools were used, including Metastats and R statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It is generally accepted that the incidence and mortality of CRC is higher in AAs than in CAs. However, the reason for this disparity is not well understood. We hypothesize that the gut microbiome plays a role in regulating this disparity. Indeed, we found significant differences in species richness and diversity between AAs and CAs. <i>Bacteroidetes</i> was more abundant in AAs than in CAs. In particular, the pro-inflammatory bacteria <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> and <i>Enterobacter</i> species were significantly higher in AAs, whereas probiotic <i>Akkermansia muciniphila</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> were higher in CAs. The polyphyletic <i>Clostridia</i> class showed a divergent pattern, with <i>Clostridium XI</i> elevated in AAs, and <i>Clostridium IV</i>, known for its beneficial function, higher in CAs. Lastly, the AA group had decreased microbial diversity overall in comparison to the CA group. In summary, there were significant differences in pro-inflammatory bacteria and microbial diversity between AA and CA, which may help explain the CRC disparity between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our current investigation, for the first time, demonstrates microbial dysbiosis between AAs and CAs, which could contribute to the racial disparity of CRC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"47-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4291/wjgp.v9.i2.47\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v9.i2.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v9.i2.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
摘要
目的:确定肠道微生物组是否以及在多大程度上参与调节结直肠癌(CRC)的种族差异。方法:招募所有患者,按照机构审查委员会(IRB)、John D. Dingell VAMC委员会和Wayne State University指南的相关指南和规定进行实验。非裔美国人(AA)和高加索美国人(CA)患者被安排进行门诊结肠镜检查,没有活动性恶性肿瘤的志愿者患者被双重同意,最初由胃肠病学家,后来由研究协调员,参与研究。采用16sRNA分析方法检测aa和CAs的结肠出水中的肠道微生物群落,并采用基于sybr的Real Time PCR方法验证细菌鉴定。为了进行宏基因组分析以表征微生物群落,使用了多种软件/工具,包括Metastats和R统计软件。结果:一般认为AAs结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率高于CAs。然而,造成这种差异的原因尚不清楚。我们假设肠道微生物组在调节这种差异方面发挥了作用。事实上,我们发现AAs和CAs之间的物种丰富度和多样性存在显著差异。拟杆菌门在AAs中比在CAs中更丰富。其中,促炎细菌核仁梭杆菌和肠杆菌在AAs中含量显著增加,而益生菌嗜粘杆菌和双歧杆菌在CAs中含量显著增加。最后,与CA组相比,AA组总体上降低了微生物多样性。综上所述,AA和CA在促炎细菌和微生物多样性方面存在显著差异,这可能有助于解释组间CRC差异。结论:我们目前的研究首次证明了AAs和CAs之间的微生物生态失调,这可能是导致结直肠癌种族差异的原因。
Gut microbiome profiling and colorectal cancer in African Americans and Caucasian Americans.
Aim: To determine whether and to what extent the gut microbiome is involved in regulating racial disparity in colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods: All patients were recruited and experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB), committees of the John D. Dingell VAMC and Wayne State University guidelines. African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) patients were scheduled for an outpatient screening for colonoscopy, and no active malignancy volunteer patients were doubly consented, initially by the gastroenterologist and later by the study coordinator, for participation in the study. The gut microbial communities in colonic effluents from AAs and CAs were examined using 16sRNA profiling, and bacterial identifications were validated by performing SYBR-based Real Time PCR. For metagenomic analysis to characterize the microbial communities, multiple software/tools were used, including Metastats and R statistical software.
Results: It is generally accepted that the incidence and mortality of CRC is higher in AAs than in CAs. However, the reason for this disparity is not well understood. We hypothesize that the gut microbiome plays a role in regulating this disparity. Indeed, we found significant differences in species richness and diversity between AAs and CAs. Bacteroidetes was more abundant in AAs than in CAs. In particular, the pro-inflammatory bacteria Fusobacterium nucleatum and Enterobacter species were significantly higher in AAs, whereas probiotic Akkermansia muciniphila and Bifidobacterium were higher in CAs. The polyphyletic Clostridia class showed a divergent pattern, with Clostridium XI elevated in AAs, and Clostridium IV, known for its beneficial function, higher in CAs. Lastly, the AA group had decreased microbial diversity overall in comparison to the CA group. In summary, there were significant differences in pro-inflammatory bacteria and microbial diversity between AA and CA, which may help explain the CRC disparity between groups.
Conclusion: Our current investigation, for the first time, demonstrates microbial dysbiosis between AAs and CAs, which could contribute to the racial disparity of CRC.