多病症与死亡率:一项为期 15 年、以登记为基础的丹麦全国人口纵向研究。

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2018-10-14 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2235042X18804063
T G Willadsen, V Siersma, D R Nicolaisdóttir, R Køster-Rasmussen, D E Jarbøl, S Reventlow, S W Mercer, N de Fine Olivarius
{"title":"多病症与死亡率:一项为期 15 年、以登记为基础的丹麦全国人口纵向研究。","authors":"T G Willadsen, V Siersma, D R Nicolaisdóttir, R Køster-Rasmussen, D E Jarbøl, S Reventlow, S W Mercer, N de Fine Olivarius","doi":"10.1177/2235042X18804063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge about prevalent and deadly combinations of multimorbidity is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the nationwide prevalence of multimorbidity and estimate mortality for the most prevalent combinations of one to five diagnosis groups. Furthermore, to assess the excess mortality of the combination of two groups compared to the product of mortality associated with the single groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort study using Danish registries and including 3.986.209 people aged ≥18 years on 1 January, 2000. Multimorbidity was defined as having diagnoses from at least 2 of 10 diagnosis groups: lung, musculoskeletal, endocrine, mental, cancer, neurological, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, kidney, and sensory organs. Logistic regression (odds ratios, ORs) and ratio of ORs (ROR) were used to study mortality and excess mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of multimorbidity was 7.1% in the Danish population. The most prevalent combination was the musculoskeletal-cardiovascular (0.4%), which had double the mortality (OR, 2.03) compared to persons not belonging to any of the diagnosis groups but showed no excess mortality (ROR, 0.97). The neurological-cancer combination had the highest mortality (OR, 6.35), was less prevalent (0.07%), and had no excess mortality (ROR, 0.94). Cardiovascular-lung was moderately prevalent (0.2%), had high mortality (OR, 5.75), and had excess mortality (ROR, 1.18). Endocrine-kidney had high excess mortality (ROR, 1.81) and cancer-mental had low excess mortality (ROR, 0.66). Mortality increased with the number of groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All combinations had increased mortality risk with some of them having up to a six-fold increased risk. Mortality increased with the number of diagnosis groups. Most combinations did not increase mortality above that expected, that is, were additive rather than synergistic.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"8 1","pages":"2235042X18804063"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/50/10.1177_2235042X18804063.PMC6194940.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimorbidity and mortality: A 15-year longitudinal registry-based nationwide Danish population study.\",\"authors\":\"T G Willadsen, V Siersma, D R Nicolaisdóttir, R Køster-Rasmussen, D E Jarbøl, S Reventlow, S W Mercer, N de Fine Olivarius\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2235042X18804063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge about prevalent and deadly combinations of multimorbidity is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the nationwide prevalence of multimorbidity and estimate mortality for the most prevalent combinations of one to five diagnosis groups. Furthermore, to assess the excess mortality of the combination of two groups compared to the product of mortality associated with the single groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort study using Danish registries and including 3.986.209 people aged ≥18 years on 1 January, 2000. Multimorbidity was defined as having diagnoses from at least 2 of 10 diagnosis groups: lung, musculoskeletal, endocrine, mental, cancer, neurological, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, kidney, and sensory organs. Logistic regression (odds ratios, ORs) and ratio of ORs (ROR) were used to study mortality and excess mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of multimorbidity was 7.1% in the Danish population. The most prevalent combination was the musculoskeletal-cardiovascular (0.4%), which had double the mortality (OR, 2.03) compared to persons not belonging to any of the diagnosis groups but showed no excess mortality (ROR, 0.97). The neurological-cancer combination had the highest mortality (OR, 6.35), was less prevalent (0.07%), and had no excess mortality (ROR, 0.94). Cardiovascular-lung was moderately prevalent (0.2%), had high mortality (OR, 5.75), and had excess mortality (ROR, 1.18). Endocrine-kidney had high excess mortality (ROR, 1.81) and cancer-mental had low excess mortality (ROR, 0.66). Mortality increased with the number of groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All combinations had increased mortality risk with some of them having up to a six-fold increased risk. Mortality increased with the number of diagnosis groups. Most combinations did not increase mortality above that expected, that is, were additive rather than synergistic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"2235042X18804063\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/50/10.1177_2235042X18804063.PMC6194940.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X18804063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X18804063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:需要了解多病综合症的流行情况和致命组合:需要了解多病症的流行和致命组合:目的:确定多病症在全国范围内的流行程度,并估算一至五个诊断组最常见组合的死亡率。此外,与单一诊断组的死亡率乘积相比,评估两个诊断组组合的超额死亡率:设计:一项前瞻性队列研究,使用丹麦登记册,包括 3,986,209 名 2000 年 1 月 1 日年龄≥18 岁的人。多病的定义是在肺部、肌肉骨骼、内分泌、精神、癌症、神经、胃肠道、心血管、肾脏和感觉器官等 10 个诊断组中至少有 2 个诊断。采用逻辑回归(几率比,ORs)和ORs比值(ROR)来研究死亡率和超额死亡率:结果:丹麦人口的多病患病率为 7.1%。最常见的多病组合是肌肉骨骼-心血管(0.4%),其死亡率(OR,2.03)是不属于任何诊断组的人的两倍,但没有显示超额死亡率(ROR,0.97)。神经系统-癌症组合的死亡率最高(OR,6.35),发病率较低(0.07%),但没有超额死亡率(ROR,0.94)。心血管-肺的发病率中等(0.2%),死亡率较高(OR,5.75),且有超额死亡率(ROR,1.18)。内分泌-肾脏的超额死亡率较高(ROR,1.81),癌症-精神的超额死亡率较低(ROR,0.66)。死亡率随组合数量的增加而增加:结论:所有组合的死亡率风险都会增加,其中一些组合的死亡率风险最多可增加六倍。死亡率随诊断组数的增加而增加。大多数组合的死亡率增加幅度并没有超过预期,也就是说,这些组合是相加的,而不是相乘的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multimorbidity and mortality: A 15-year longitudinal registry-based nationwide Danish population study.

Background: Knowledge about prevalent and deadly combinations of multimorbidity is needed.

Objective: To determine the nationwide prevalence of multimorbidity and estimate mortality for the most prevalent combinations of one to five diagnosis groups. Furthermore, to assess the excess mortality of the combination of two groups compared to the product of mortality associated with the single groups.

Design: A prospective cohort study using Danish registries and including 3.986.209 people aged ≥18 years on 1 January, 2000. Multimorbidity was defined as having diagnoses from at least 2 of 10 diagnosis groups: lung, musculoskeletal, endocrine, mental, cancer, neurological, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, kidney, and sensory organs. Logistic regression (odds ratios, ORs) and ratio of ORs (ROR) were used to study mortality and excess mortality.

Results: Prevalence of multimorbidity was 7.1% in the Danish population. The most prevalent combination was the musculoskeletal-cardiovascular (0.4%), which had double the mortality (OR, 2.03) compared to persons not belonging to any of the diagnosis groups but showed no excess mortality (ROR, 0.97). The neurological-cancer combination had the highest mortality (OR, 6.35), was less prevalent (0.07%), and had no excess mortality (ROR, 0.94). Cardiovascular-lung was moderately prevalent (0.2%), had high mortality (OR, 5.75), and had excess mortality (ROR, 1.18). Endocrine-kidney had high excess mortality (ROR, 1.81) and cancer-mental had low excess mortality (ROR, 0.66). Mortality increased with the number of groups.

Conclusions: All combinations had increased mortality risk with some of them having up to a six-fold increased risk. Mortality increased with the number of diagnosis groups. Most combinations did not increase mortality above that expected, that is, were additive rather than synergistic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiences of older primary care patients with multimorbidity and their caregivers in navigating the healthcare system: A qualitative study protocol. Bi-directional association between depression and HF: An electronic health records-based cohort study. The association between clusters of chronic conditions and psychological well-being in younger and older people-A cross-sectional, population-based study from the Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark. The complexity of caregiving for community-living older adults with multiple chronic conditions: A qualitative study. Synergistic effects of hip/knee osteoarthritis and comorbidities on mobility and self-care limitations among older adults: Cross-sectional analysis of the Oxford pain, Activity and Lifestyle study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1