来曲唑配合定时性交与枸橼酸克罗米芬配合宫内人工授精治疗不明原因不孕症的比较。

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine 生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2016-09-01
Jorge Rodriguez-Purata, Joseph Lee, Michael Whitehouse, Benjamin Sandler, Alan Copperman, Tanmoy Mukherjee
{"title":"来曲唑配合定时性交与枸橼酸克罗米芬配合宫内人工授精治疗不明原因不孕症的比较。","authors":"Jorge Rodriguez-Purata,&nbsp;Joseph Lee,&nbsp;Michael Whitehouse,&nbsp;Benjamin Sandler,&nbsp;Alan Copperman,&nbsp;Tanmoy Mukherjee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate outcomes of patients with unexplained infertility who underwent letrozole (LET)- stimulated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with timed sexual intercourse (IC) as compared to patients treated with clomiphene citrate (CC) and intrauterine insemination (IUI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A non- randomized, retrospective study where unexplained in- fertility patients (n=7,764). underwent a COS cycle with both LET and timed IC or with CC and IUI from January 2010-June 2014. One group consisted of patients who completed a COS cycle with LET and were instructed to have sexual IC. The other included patients were treated with CC and underwent IUI. Pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was observed in each group's age or serum follicule-stimulating hor- mone levels. A statistical significance in LET versus CC-stimulated groups was observed for mean endome- trial thickness (8.3 ± 1.7 vs. 7.9 ± 1.8 mm) and follicular response (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3), respectively. Clinical PRs after timed IC were significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (15.0% vs 11.8%). Clinical PRs after timed IUI were also significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (12.3% vs. 11.5%). Moreover, clinical PRs in LET with IC were significant- ly higher than CC with IUI (15.0% vs. 11.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unexplained infertility patients who underwent LET stimulation with IC werefound to have better pregnancy out- comes as compared to those who underwent timed IC.or IUI with CC stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"61 9-10","pages":"425-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparision of Letrozole with Timed Intercourse Versus Clomiphene Citrate with Intrauterine Insemination in Patients with Unexplained Infertility.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Rodriguez-Purata,&nbsp;Joseph Lee,&nbsp;Michael Whitehouse,&nbsp;Benjamin Sandler,&nbsp;Alan Copperman,&nbsp;Tanmoy Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate outcomes of patients with unexplained infertility who underwent letrozole (LET)- stimulated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with timed sexual intercourse (IC) as compared to patients treated with clomiphene citrate (CC) and intrauterine insemination (IUI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A non- randomized, retrospective study where unexplained in- fertility patients (n=7,764). underwent a COS cycle with both LET and timed IC or with CC and IUI from January 2010-June 2014. One group consisted of patients who completed a COS cycle with LET and were instructed to have sexual IC. The other included patients were treated with CC and underwent IUI. Pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was observed in each group's age or serum follicule-stimulating hor- mone levels. A statistical significance in LET versus CC-stimulated groups was observed for mean endome- trial thickness (8.3 ± 1.7 vs. 7.9 ± 1.8 mm) and follicular response (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3), respectively. Clinical PRs after timed IC were significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (15.0% vs 11.8%). Clinical PRs after timed IUI were also significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (12.3% vs. 11.5%). Moreover, clinical PRs in LET with IC were significant- ly higher than CC with IUI (15.0% vs. 11.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unexplained infertility patients who underwent LET stimulation with IC werefound to have better pregnancy out- comes as compared to those who underwent timed IC.or IUI with CC stimulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"61 9-10\",\"pages\":\"425-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价不明原因不孕症患者接受来曲唑(LET)刺激的控制性卵巢刺激(COS)伴定时性交(IC)与枸橼酸克罗米芬(CC)联合宫内人工授精(IUI)治疗的疗效。研究设计:一项非随机、回顾性研究,纳入原因不明的不孕患者(n=7,764)。从2010年1月至2014年6月,接受了LET和定时IC或CC和IUI的COS周期。一组患者使用LET完成COS周期,并被指示进行性IC。另一组患者接受CC治疗并进行IUI。比较各组妊娠率(pr)。结果:各组年龄及血清促卵泡激素水平差异无统计学意义。LET组与cc刺激组的平均内膜试验厚度(8.3±1.7 vs 7.9±1.8 mm)和卵泡反应(2.0±1.0 vs 2.3±1.3)分别有统计学意义。与cc刺激组相比,LET刺激组定时IC后的临床pr明显更高(15.0% vs 11.8%)。与cc刺激组相比,LET组定时IUI后的临床pr也显著更高(12.3%对11.5%)。此外,LET合并IC的临床pr显著高于CC合并IUI (15.0% vs 11.5%)。结论:原因不明的不孕症患者接受LET刺激与IC相比,接受定时ivf或IUI与CC刺激的患者有更好的妊娠结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparision of Letrozole with Timed Intercourse Versus Clomiphene Citrate with Intrauterine Insemination in Patients with Unexplained Infertility.

Objective: To evaluate outcomes of patients with unexplained infertility who underwent letrozole (LET)- stimulated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with timed sexual intercourse (IC) as compared to patients treated with clomiphene citrate (CC) and intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Study design: A non- randomized, retrospective study where unexplained in- fertility patients (n=7,764). underwent a COS cycle with both LET and timed IC or with CC and IUI from January 2010-June 2014. One group consisted of patients who completed a COS cycle with LET and were instructed to have sexual IC. The other included patients were treated with CC and underwent IUI. Pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared between groups.

Results: No statistical difference was observed in each group's age or serum follicule-stimulating hor- mone levels. A statistical significance in LET versus CC-stimulated groups was observed for mean endome- trial thickness (8.3 ± 1.7 vs. 7.9 ± 1.8 mm) and follicular response (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3), respectively. Clinical PRs after timed IC were significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (15.0% vs 11.8%). Clinical PRs after timed IUI were also significantly higher in the LET versus CC-stimulated group (12.3% vs. 11.5%). Moreover, clinical PRs in LET with IC were significant- ly higher than CC with IUI (15.0% vs. 11.5%).

Conclusion: Unexplained infertility patients who underwent LET stimulation with IC werefound to have better pregnancy out- comes as compared to those who underwent timed IC.or IUI with CC stimulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
期刊最新文献
Role of Capecitabine in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Drug for Two Settings. Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Using a Ring-Shaped Loop Versus a Right-Angled Triangular Loop. Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Common and Distinct Signatures Underlying Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancers. Analysis of Related Causes for No Embryos Transferred and Corresponding Coping Measures in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cesarean Section Rates and Clinical Indications at a Large North African Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1