Brenda Johnson, Diane Handler, Victor Urrutia, Anne W Alexandrov
{"title":"保留住院期间提供的卒中教育:提供必要的教育会增加卒中知识吗?","authors":"Brenda Johnson, Diane Handler, Victor Urrutia, Anne W Alexandrov","doi":"10.1159/000488884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Provision of stroke education to patients is a Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) requirement. However, little is known about retention of the educational content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two pilot studies were conducted: Pilot A delivered CMS-required stroke education during hospitalization in a standardized manner and tested knowledge retention in patients returning to the Stroke Clinic for 1-month follow-up; Pilot B randomized patients to either a control group with standardized education or a test-enhanced learning group (target), with measurement of stroke knowledge retention at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 198 patients/caregivers participated in Pilot A, with only 25% scoring 100% correct on required stroke education items. The question most commonly answered incorrectly (<i>n</i> = 117; 59%) was \"personal risk factors for stroke,\" and 74 (37%) could not correctly identify stroke signs and symptoms. Pilot B found that significantly more target group patients could identify their personal stroke risk factors (100 vs. 67%; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and the purpose of their secondary prevention medications (87 vs. 40%; <i>p</i> = 0.02) compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While stroke education is required during hospitalization, its ability to produce retention may be poor. We propose study of test-enhanced learning methods through the Targeted Education in Stroke Trial (TEST) to examine the effect of novel teaching methods on patient/caregiver knowledge retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6216712/pdf/ine-0007-0471.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retention of Stroke Education Provided during Hospitalization: Does Provision of Required Education Increase Stroke Knowledge?\",\"authors\":\"Brenda Johnson, Diane Handler, Victor Urrutia, Anne W Alexandrov\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000488884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Provision of stroke education to patients is a Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) requirement. However, little is known about retention of the educational content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two pilot studies were conducted: Pilot A delivered CMS-required stroke education during hospitalization in a standardized manner and tested knowledge retention in patients returning to the Stroke Clinic for 1-month follow-up; Pilot B randomized patients to either a control group with standardized education or a test-enhanced learning group (target), with measurement of stroke knowledge retention at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 198 patients/caregivers participated in Pilot A, with only 25% scoring 100% correct on required stroke education items. The question most commonly answered incorrectly (<i>n</i> = 117; 59%) was \\\"personal risk factors for stroke,\\\" and 74 (37%) could not correctly identify stroke signs and symptoms. Pilot B found that significantly more target group patients could identify their personal stroke risk factors (100 vs. 67%; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and the purpose of their secondary prevention medications (87 vs. 40%; <i>p</i> = 0.02) compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While stroke education is required during hospitalization, its ability to produce retention may be poor. We propose study of test-enhanced learning methods through the Targeted Education in Stroke Trial (TEST) to examine the effect of novel teaching methods on patient/caregiver knowledge retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6216712/pdf/ine-0007-0471.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000488884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000488884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:向患者提供中风教育是美国医疗保险/医疗补助中心(CMS)的要求。然而,人们对教育内容的保留情况知之甚少:方法:进行了两项试点研究:试点 A 在住院期间以标准化方式提供 CMS 要求的卒中教育,并对返回卒中门诊进行 1 个月随访的患者进行知识保留情况测试;试点 B 将患者随机分为接受标准化教育的对照组或测试强化学习组(目标),并在出院时对卒中知识保留情况进行测量:共有 198 名患者/护理人员参加了试点 A,其中只有 25% 的人在脑卒中教育必答题上的正确率达到 100%。最常答错的问题(n = 117;59%)是 "中风的个人危险因素",74 人(37%)不能正确识别中风的体征和症状。试点 B 发现,与对照组相比,目标组患者能识别其个人中风风险因素(100 vs. 67%;p = 0.04)和二级预防用药目的(87 vs. 40%;p = 0.02)的人数明显增多:讨论:虽然住院期间需要进行脑卒中教育,但教育效果可能不佳。我们建议通过 "卒中目标教育试验"(TEST)研究测试增强学习方法,以检验新型教学方法对患者/护理人员知识保留的影响。
Retention of Stroke Education Provided during Hospitalization: Does Provision of Required Education Increase Stroke Knowledge?
Background: Provision of stroke education to patients is a Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) requirement. However, little is known about retention of the educational content.
Methods: Two pilot studies were conducted: Pilot A delivered CMS-required stroke education during hospitalization in a standardized manner and tested knowledge retention in patients returning to the Stroke Clinic for 1-month follow-up; Pilot B randomized patients to either a control group with standardized education or a test-enhanced learning group (target), with measurement of stroke knowledge retention at hospital discharge.
Results: A total of 198 patients/caregivers participated in Pilot A, with only 25% scoring 100% correct on required stroke education items. The question most commonly answered incorrectly (n = 117; 59%) was "personal risk factors for stroke," and 74 (37%) could not correctly identify stroke signs and symptoms. Pilot B found that significantly more target group patients could identify their personal stroke risk factors (100 vs. 67%; p = 0.04) and the purpose of their secondary prevention medications (87 vs. 40%; p = 0.02) compared to controls.
Discussion: While stroke education is required during hospitalization, its ability to produce retention may be poor. We propose study of test-enhanced learning methods through the Targeted Education in Stroke Trial (TEST) to examine the effect of novel teaching methods on patient/caregiver knowledge retention.