虚梗死核和入院计算机断层扫描灌注:重新定义急性缺血性脑卒中神经影像学的作用。

Q1 Medicine Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-31 DOI:10.1159/000490117
Nuno Martins, Ana Aires, Beatriz Mendez, Sandra Boned, Marta Rubiera, Alejandro Tomasello, Pilar Coscojuela, David Hernandez, Marián Muchada, David Rodríguez-Luna, Noelia Rodríguez, Jesús M Juega, Jorge Pagola, Carlos A Molina, Marc Ribó
{"title":"虚梗死核和入院计算机断层扫描灌注:重新定义急性缺血性脑卒中神经影像学的作用。","authors":"Nuno Martins,&nbsp;Ana Aires,&nbsp;Beatriz Mendez,&nbsp;Sandra Boned,&nbsp;Marta Rubiera,&nbsp;Alejandro Tomasello,&nbsp;Pilar Coscojuela,&nbsp;David Hernandez,&nbsp;Marián Muchada,&nbsp;David Rodríguez-Luna,&nbsp;Noelia Rodríguez,&nbsp;Jesús M Juega,&nbsp;Jorge Pagola,&nbsp;Carlos A Molina,&nbsp;Marc Ribó","doi":"10.1159/000490117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Determining the size of infarct extent is crucial to elect patients for reperfusion therapies. Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) based on cerebral blood volume may overestimate infarct core on admission and consequently include ghost infarct core (GIC) in a definitive lesional area.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our goal was to confirm and better characterize the GIC phenomenon using CTP cerebral blood flow (CBF) as the reference parameter to determine infarct core.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive thrombectomies of middle cerebral or intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions considering noncontrast CT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score ≥6 in patients with pretreatment CTP. We used the RAPID® software to measure admission infarct core based on initial CBF. The final infarct was extracted from follow-up CT. GIC was defined as initial core minus final infarct > 10 mL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 patients were included. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18 (13-20), the median time from symptoms to CTP was 188 (67-288) min, and the recanalization rate (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b, 2c, or 3) was 83%. Twenty patients (16%) presented with GIC. GIC was associated with shorter time to recanalization (150 [105-291] vs. 255 [163-367] min, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and larger initial CBF core volume (38 [26-59] vs. 6 [0-27] mL, <i>p</i> < 0.001). An adjusted logistic regression model identified time to recanalization < 302 min (OR 4.598, 95% CI 1.143-18.495, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and initial infarct volume (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.019, <i>p</i> = 0.032) as independent predictors of GIC. At 24 h, clinical improvement was more frequent in patients with GIC (80 vs. 49%, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTP CBF < 30% may overestimate infarct core volume, especially in patients imaged in the very early time window and with fast complete reperfusion. Therefore, the CTP CBF technique may exclude patients who would benefit from endovascular treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000490117","citationCount":"66","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ghost Infarct Core and Admission Computed Tomography Perfusion: Redefining the Role of Neuroimaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Nuno Martins,&nbsp;Ana Aires,&nbsp;Beatriz Mendez,&nbsp;Sandra Boned,&nbsp;Marta Rubiera,&nbsp;Alejandro Tomasello,&nbsp;Pilar Coscojuela,&nbsp;David Hernandez,&nbsp;Marián Muchada,&nbsp;David Rodríguez-Luna,&nbsp;Noelia Rodríguez,&nbsp;Jesús M Juega,&nbsp;Jorge Pagola,&nbsp;Carlos A Molina,&nbsp;Marc Ribó\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000490117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Determining the size of infarct extent is crucial to elect patients for reperfusion therapies. Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) based on cerebral blood volume may overestimate infarct core on admission and consequently include ghost infarct core (GIC) in a definitive lesional area.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our goal was to confirm and better characterize the GIC phenomenon using CTP cerebral blood flow (CBF) as the reference parameter to determine infarct core.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive thrombectomies of middle cerebral or intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions considering noncontrast CT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score ≥6 in patients with pretreatment CTP. We used the RAPID® software to measure admission infarct core based on initial CBF. The final infarct was extracted from follow-up CT. GIC was defined as initial core minus final infarct > 10 mL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 patients were included. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18 (13-20), the median time from symptoms to CTP was 188 (67-288) min, and the recanalization rate (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b, 2c, or 3) was 83%. Twenty patients (16%) presented with GIC. GIC was associated with shorter time to recanalization (150 [105-291] vs. 255 [163-367] min, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and larger initial CBF core volume (38 [26-59] vs. 6 [0-27] mL, <i>p</i> < 0.001). An adjusted logistic regression model identified time to recanalization < 302 min (OR 4.598, 95% CI 1.143-18.495, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and initial infarct volume (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.019, <i>p</i> = 0.032) as independent predictors of GIC. At 24 h, clinical improvement was more frequent in patients with GIC (80 vs. 49%, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTP CBF < 30% may overestimate infarct core volume, especially in patients imaged in the very early time window and with fast complete reperfusion. Therefore, the CTP CBF technique may exclude patients who would benefit from endovascular treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000490117\",\"citationCount\":\"66\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000490117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000490117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

摘要

背景:确定梗死范围的大小对于选择再灌注治疗的患者至关重要。基于脑血容量的计算机断层扫描灌注(CTP)可能会在入院时高估梗死核心,从而在确定的病变区域包括虚梗死核心(GIC)。目的:我们的目的是用CTP脑血流量(CBF)作为确定梗死核心的参考参数来确认和更好地表征GIC现象。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性的单中心分析,考虑非对比CT阿尔伯塔卒中计划(Alberta Stroke Program)对预处理CTP患者早期CT评分≥6分的连续脑中或颅内颈内动脉闭塞的血栓切除术。我们使用RAPID®软件根据初始CBF测量入院梗死核心。从随访CT中提取最终梗死灶。GIC定义为初始核心减去最终梗死> 10 ml。结果:共纳入123例患者。美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分中位数为18(13-20),从症状到CTP的中位数时间为188 (67-288)min,再通率(脑梗死溶栓评分2b、2c或3)为83%。20例(16%)患者表现为GIC。GIC与较短的再通时间(150 [105-291]vs 255 [163-367] min, p = 0.05)和较大的初始CBF核心容积(38 [26-59]vs 6 [0-27] mL, p < 0.001)相关。调整后的logistic回归模型确定再通时间< 302 min (OR 4.598, 95% CI 1.143-18.495, p = 0.032)和初始梗死体积(OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.019, p = 0.032)是GIC的独立预测因子。24小时时,GIC患者的临床改善更为频繁(80%比49%,p = 0.01)。结论:CTP CBF < 30%可能高估了梗死核体积,特别是在非常早的时间窗和快速完全再灌注的患者。因此,CTP CBF技术可能会排除从血管内治疗中获益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ghost Infarct Core and Admission Computed Tomography Perfusion: Redefining the Role of Neuroimaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Background: Determining the size of infarct extent is crucial to elect patients for reperfusion therapies. Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) based on cerebral blood volume may overestimate infarct core on admission and consequently include ghost infarct core (GIC) in a definitive lesional area.

Purpose: Our goal was to confirm and better characterize the GIC phenomenon using CTP cerebral blood flow (CBF) as the reference parameter to determine infarct core.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive thrombectomies of middle cerebral or intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions considering noncontrast CT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score ≥6 in patients with pretreatment CTP. We used the RAPID® software to measure admission infarct core based on initial CBF. The final infarct was extracted from follow-up CT. GIC was defined as initial core minus final infarct > 10 mL.

Results: A total of 123 patients were included. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18 (13-20), the median time from symptoms to CTP was 188 (67-288) min, and the recanalization rate (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b, 2c, or 3) was 83%. Twenty patients (16%) presented with GIC. GIC was associated with shorter time to recanalization (150 [105-291] vs. 255 [163-367] min, p = 0.05) and larger initial CBF core volume (38 [26-59] vs. 6 [0-27] mL, p < 0.001). An adjusted logistic regression model identified time to recanalization < 302 min (OR 4.598, 95% CI 1.143-18.495, p = 0.032) and initial infarct volume (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.019, p = 0.032) as independent predictors of GIC. At 24 h, clinical improvement was more frequent in patients with GIC (80 vs. 49%, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: CTP CBF < 30% may overestimate infarct core volume, especially in patients imaged in the very early time window and with fast complete reperfusion. Therefore, the CTP CBF technique may exclude patients who would benefit from endovascular treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recanalization of Tandem Vertebrobasilar Occlusions with Contralateral Vertebral Occlusion or Hypoplasia via either Direct Passage or the SHERPA Technique. Does the Addition of Non-Approved Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for rtPA Impact Treatment Rates? Findings in Australia, the UK, and the USA. In vitro Remote Aspiration Embolectomy for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Isolated Cervical Carotid Occlusions: The Concept of "Hemodynamic Thrombectomy". An Appraisal of the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1