中国大学招生中的平权法案是否导致了错配?中国少数民族的教育质量和学士学位的相对回报。

Sai Ding, Samuel L Myers, Gregory N Price
{"title":"中国大学招生中的平权法案是否导致了错配?中国少数民族的教育质量和学士学位的相对回报。","authors":"Sai Ding,&nbsp;Samuel L Myers,&nbsp;Gregory N Price","doi":"10.1186/s41257-017-0006-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper provides a unique illustration of the benefits of affirmative action in higher educaiton. It focuses on China in the early 21<sup>st</sup> Century to gauge the impacts of advantges afforded to ethnic minority group members in admissions to colleges and univerities. It specifically addresses a variant of the mismatch hypothesis that alleges that minority students sorted into higher ranked universities are worse off than equallty qualified minorities attending lower-ranked universities. In particular, we examine the expected earnings of minorities vs non-minorities attending elite vs less selective colleges and universities in China. The paper utilizes data from the 2002 Chinese Household Income Project to estimate the labor market return to graduating from college relative to high school to assess the impact of post-reform affirmative action in college/univerity admissions in China. Parameter estimates of heterogeneous treatment effects reveal that for minorities, the average treatment effect of earning a baccalaureate degree from colleges/universities ranked good and very good is high relative to the Han majority, and for those actually receiving the treatment from colleges/universities ranked good, and would be positive for those who could have earned a baccalaureate degree from colleges/universities ranked good and very good, but did not. Our results suggest that post-reform affirmative action education policies in China have been effective at improving the education and labor market outcomes of minorities, and that existing minority-Han disparities can be eliminated, and Chinese economic growth can be enhanced, by further expanding the pipeline of minorities that complete high school and enter into colleges/universities that grant baccalaureate degrees. Our findings suggest that the mismatch hypothesis cannot be viewed as a universal phenomenon that renders affirmative action in college/university admissions an ineffective policy tool to redress/remedy historic discrimination against minority groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":73421,"journal":{"name":"International journal of anthropology and ethnology","volume":"1 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41257-017-0006-7","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does affirmative action in Chinese college admissions lead to mismatch? Educational quality and the relative returns to a baccalaureate degree for minorities in China.\",\"authors\":\"Sai Ding,&nbsp;Samuel L Myers,&nbsp;Gregory N Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41257-017-0006-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper provides a unique illustration of the benefits of affirmative action in higher educaiton. It focuses on China in the early 21<sup>st</sup> Century to gauge the impacts of advantges afforded to ethnic minority group members in admissions to colleges and univerities. It specifically addresses a variant of the mismatch hypothesis that alleges that minority students sorted into higher ranked universities are worse off than equallty qualified minorities attending lower-ranked universities. In particular, we examine the expected earnings of minorities vs non-minorities attending elite vs less selective colleges and universities in China. The paper utilizes data from the 2002 Chinese Household Income Project to estimate the labor market return to graduating from college relative to high school to assess the impact of post-reform affirmative action in college/univerity admissions in China. Parameter estimates of heterogeneous treatment effects reveal that for minorities, the average treatment effect of earning a baccalaureate degree from colleges/universities ranked good and very good is high relative to the Han majority, and for those actually receiving the treatment from colleges/universities ranked good, and would be positive for those who could have earned a baccalaureate degree from colleges/universities ranked good and very good, but did not. Our results suggest that post-reform affirmative action education policies in China have been effective at improving the education and labor market outcomes of minorities, and that existing minority-Han disparities can be eliminated, and Chinese economic growth can be enhanced, by further expanding the pipeline of minorities that complete high school and enter into colleges/universities that grant baccalaureate degrees. Our findings suggest that the mismatch hypothesis cannot be viewed as a universal phenomenon that renders affirmative action in college/university admissions an ineffective policy tool to redress/remedy historic discrimination against minority groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of anthropology and ethnology\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41257-017-0006-7\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of anthropology and ethnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-017-0006-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of anthropology and ethnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-017-0006-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文提供了高等教育平权行动的好处的一个独特的说明。该报告以21世纪初的中国为研究对象,评估少数民族在高校录取方面的优势所产生的影响。它特别解决了错配假说的一种变体,该假说声称,被排名较高的大学录取的少数族裔学生比同等资格的上排名较低的大学的少数族裔学生境况更差。特别是,我们研究了中国少数民族与非少数民族就读精英大学与非精英大学的预期收入。本文利用2002年中国家庭收入项目的数据来估计劳动力市场相对于高中毕业的回报,以评估改革后平权法案对中国高校招生的影响。异质性治疗效果的参数估计显示,对于少数民族来说,获得学院/大学学士学位的平均治疗效果排名好和非常好,相对于汉族多数来说,对于那些实际接受学院/大学治疗的人来说排名好,对于那些本可以获得学院/大学学士学位的人来说,排名好和非常好,但没有。我们的研究结果表明,改革后中国的平权教育政策在改善少数民族的教育和劳动力市场结果方面是有效的,通过进一步扩大少数民族完成高中学业并进入授予学士学位的学院/大学的管道,可以消除现有的少数民族与汉族之间的差距,并促进中国的经济增长。我们的研究结果表明,不匹配假说不能被视为一种普遍现象,这种现象使得大学招生中的平权行动成为纠正/纠正历史上对少数群体歧视的无效政策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does affirmative action in Chinese college admissions lead to mismatch? Educational quality and the relative returns to a baccalaureate degree for minorities in China.

This paper provides a unique illustration of the benefits of affirmative action in higher educaiton. It focuses on China in the early 21st Century to gauge the impacts of advantges afforded to ethnic minority group members in admissions to colleges and univerities. It specifically addresses a variant of the mismatch hypothesis that alleges that minority students sorted into higher ranked universities are worse off than equallty qualified minorities attending lower-ranked universities. In particular, we examine the expected earnings of minorities vs non-minorities attending elite vs less selective colleges and universities in China. The paper utilizes data from the 2002 Chinese Household Income Project to estimate the labor market return to graduating from college relative to high school to assess the impact of post-reform affirmative action in college/univerity admissions in China. Parameter estimates of heterogeneous treatment effects reveal that for minorities, the average treatment effect of earning a baccalaureate degree from colleges/universities ranked good and very good is high relative to the Han majority, and for those actually receiving the treatment from colleges/universities ranked good, and would be positive for those who could have earned a baccalaureate degree from colleges/universities ranked good and very good, but did not. Our results suggest that post-reform affirmative action education policies in China have been effective at improving the education and labor market outcomes of minorities, and that existing minority-Han disparities can be eliminated, and Chinese economic growth can be enhanced, by further expanding the pipeline of minorities that complete high school and enter into colleges/universities that grant baccalaureate degrees. Our findings suggest that the mismatch hypothesis cannot be viewed as a universal phenomenon that renders affirmative action in college/university admissions an ineffective policy tool to redress/remedy historic discrimination against minority groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The heritagization of cultural politics: anthropological research on Chinese cultural heritage Ethnic integration in the “Lin-ge” migration epic: a grassroots perspective Seventy years of study on ethnic paleography in China The fundamental issues in promoting modern civilization of the Chinese Nation Being in-between “to return or to stay”: exploring the experiences of urban displaced people in Mozambique’s Pemba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1