养老院护理。每日HHD与常规透析:生存比较。

Nephrology news & issues Pub Date : 2017-02-01
Alex Yang, Annette Lee, Kathy Hocking
{"title":"养老院护理。每日HHD与常规透析:生存比较。","authors":"Alex Yang,&nbsp;Annette Lee,&nbsp;Kathy Hocking","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients that dialyze in the nursing home setting are known to be an especially at-risk vulnerable population compared to the overall ESRD population. This is likely due to the nursing home dialysis patients' advanced age, multiple co-morbidities, and frailty, requiring skilled nursing support. These challenges often result in worse outcomes compared to the overall end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population but few studies have investigated interventions to improve health outcomes in this population. Previously, we reported results from a study using a large epidemiological database of patients from an independent nursing home dialysis provider, showing that patients treated with daily home hemodialysis had improved outcomes compared to patients treated with conventional dialysis. One limitation of the previous study was that the timeframe for the two comparison groups was different; therefore, the results could have been due to over-all improvements in care over time unrelated to the modality of dialysis: To address this as well as expand on the previous analysis, the objective of the present study was to compare outcomes in ESRD patients in the nursing home setting treated with daily home hemodialysis versus con- ventional three-day-a-week (TIW) hemodialysis using an updated database, specifically assessing patients treated during a concurrent time: frame. Health status was evaluated for 6,314 patients (n=4,778 conventional, n=1,902 daily home hemodialysis; 2006 to November 2015 for conventional; 2011 to November 2015 for daily home hemodialysis). Analyses included monthly mortality rates, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and laboratory values. In the \"Compared to the conventional dialysis population, daily HHD patients had similar or lower incident mortality rates.\" analysis of patients treated during the concurrent timeframe, median overall survival was 36 months with daily home hemodialysis versus 21 months with conventional dialysis (P=0.0025). These results were similar to the analysis of all patients regardless of timeframe. Compared to the conventional dialysis population, daily home hemodialysis patients had similar or lower incident mortality rates. Survival rates were higher at 3 months (89% vs 82%), 6 months (84% vs 73%), and 12 months (74% vs 62%) in the daily home hemodialy- sis population compared to conventional dialysis population. Monthly mean albumin was consistent over time in the daily home hemodialysis population but gradually increased in the conventional dialysis population. Hemoglobin values were consistently lower over the follow-up period in the daily home hemodialysis population and ferritin values were similar in both populations. These results confirm and extend previous findings that daily home hemodialysis is associated with improved patient outcomes compared to conventional hemodialysis. Although difficult to conduct practically, a prospective randomized outcomes study evaluating daily home hemodialysis versus conventional TIW dialysis would be valuable in informing the standard of dialysis care in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":77281,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology news & issues","volume":"31 2","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing home care. Daily HHD vs conventional dialysis: A survival comparison.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Yang,&nbsp;Annette Lee,&nbsp;Kathy Hocking\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients that dialyze in the nursing home setting are known to be an especially at-risk vulnerable population compared to the overall ESRD population. This is likely due to the nursing home dialysis patients' advanced age, multiple co-morbidities, and frailty, requiring skilled nursing support. These challenges often result in worse outcomes compared to the overall end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population but few studies have investigated interventions to improve health outcomes in this population. Previously, we reported results from a study using a large epidemiological database of patients from an independent nursing home dialysis provider, showing that patients treated with daily home hemodialysis had improved outcomes compared to patients treated with conventional dialysis. One limitation of the previous study was that the timeframe for the two comparison groups was different; therefore, the results could have been due to over-all improvements in care over time unrelated to the modality of dialysis: To address this as well as expand on the previous analysis, the objective of the present study was to compare outcomes in ESRD patients in the nursing home setting treated with daily home hemodialysis versus con- ventional three-day-a-week (TIW) hemodialysis using an updated database, specifically assessing patients treated during a concurrent time: frame. Health status was evaluated for 6,314 patients (n=4,778 conventional, n=1,902 daily home hemodialysis; 2006 to November 2015 for conventional; 2011 to November 2015 for daily home hemodialysis). Analyses included monthly mortality rates, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and laboratory values. In the \\\"Compared to the conventional dialysis population, daily HHD patients had similar or lower incident mortality rates.\\\" analysis of patients treated during the concurrent timeframe, median overall survival was 36 months with daily home hemodialysis versus 21 months with conventional dialysis (P=0.0025). These results were similar to the analysis of all patients regardless of timeframe. Compared to the conventional dialysis population, daily home hemodialysis patients had similar or lower incident mortality rates. Survival rates were higher at 3 months (89% vs 82%), 6 months (84% vs 73%), and 12 months (74% vs 62%) in the daily home hemodialy- sis population compared to conventional dialysis population. Monthly mean albumin was consistent over time in the daily home hemodialysis population but gradually increased in the conventional dialysis population. Hemoglobin values were consistently lower over the follow-up period in the daily home hemodialysis population and ferritin values were similar in both populations. These results confirm and extend previous findings that daily home hemodialysis is associated with improved patient outcomes compared to conventional hemodialysis. Although difficult to conduct practically, a prospective randomized outcomes study evaluating daily home hemodialysis versus conventional TIW dialysis would be valuable in informing the standard of dialysis care in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology news & issues\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"21-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology news & issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology news & issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与整个ESRD人群相比,在养老院进行透析的患者是一个特别危险的弱势群体。这可能是由于养老院透析患者的高龄,多种合并症和身体虚弱,需要熟练的护理支持。与总体终末期肾病(ESRD)人群相比,这些挑战往往导致更差的结果,但很少有研究调查干预措施以改善这一人群的健康结果。先前,我们报道了一项研究的结果,该研究使用了来自独立养老院透析提供者的大型流行病学数据库,表明与常规透析治疗的患者相比,每日家庭血液透析治疗的患者预后更好。先前研究的一个局限性是两个对照组的时间框架不同;因此,该结果可能是由于与透析方式无关的长期护理的总体改善:为了解决这一问题并扩展之前的分析,本研究的目的是使用更新的数据库比较ESRD患者在疗养院环境中接受每日家庭血液透析治疗与传统的每周三天(TIW)血液透析治疗的结果,特别评估在并发时间框架内接受治疗的患者。对6,314例患者(n=4,778例常规血液透析,n=1,902例每日家庭血液透析;2006年至2015年11月为常规;2011年至2015年11月每日家庭血液透析)。分析包括每月死亡率、Kaplan-Meier生存分析和实验室值。在“与常规透析人群相比,每日血液透析患者的死亡率相似或更低”中,对同期治疗的患者进行分析,每日家庭血液透析的中位总生存期为36个月,而常规透析的中位总生存期为21个月(P=0.0025)。这些结果与所有患者的分析相似,而不考虑时间框架。与传统透析人群相比,每日家庭血液透析患者的死亡率相似或更低。与常规透析人群相比,每日家庭血液透析人群的生存率在3个月(89%对82%)、6个月(84%对73%)和12个月(74%对62%)时更高。每月平均白蛋白在每日家庭血液透析人群中是一致的,但在常规透析人群中逐渐增加。在日常家庭血液透析人群中,血红蛋白值在随访期间持续降低,铁蛋白值在两组人群中相似。这些结果证实并扩展了先前的发现,即与传统血液透析相比,每日家庭血液透析与改善患者预后相关。尽管很难在实践中进行,但一项评估每日家庭血液透析与传统TIW透析的前瞻性随机结果研究对于告知该人群的透析护理标准是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nursing home care. Daily HHD vs conventional dialysis: A survival comparison.

Patients that dialyze in the nursing home setting are known to be an especially at-risk vulnerable population compared to the overall ESRD population. This is likely due to the nursing home dialysis patients' advanced age, multiple co-morbidities, and frailty, requiring skilled nursing support. These challenges often result in worse outcomes compared to the overall end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population but few studies have investigated interventions to improve health outcomes in this population. Previously, we reported results from a study using a large epidemiological database of patients from an independent nursing home dialysis provider, showing that patients treated with daily home hemodialysis had improved outcomes compared to patients treated with conventional dialysis. One limitation of the previous study was that the timeframe for the two comparison groups was different; therefore, the results could have been due to over-all improvements in care over time unrelated to the modality of dialysis: To address this as well as expand on the previous analysis, the objective of the present study was to compare outcomes in ESRD patients in the nursing home setting treated with daily home hemodialysis versus con- ventional three-day-a-week (TIW) hemodialysis using an updated database, specifically assessing patients treated during a concurrent time: frame. Health status was evaluated for 6,314 patients (n=4,778 conventional, n=1,902 daily home hemodialysis; 2006 to November 2015 for conventional; 2011 to November 2015 for daily home hemodialysis). Analyses included monthly mortality rates, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and laboratory values. In the "Compared to the conventional dialysis population, daily HHD patients had similar or lower incident mortality rates." analysis of patients treated during the concurrent timeframe, median overall survival was 36 months with daily home hemodialysis versus 21 months with conventional dialysis (P=0.0025). These results were similar to the analysis of all patients regardless of timeframe. Compared to the conventional dialysis population, daily home hemodialysis patients had similar or lower incident mortality rates. Survival rates were higher at 3 months (89% vs 82%), 6 months (84% vs 73%), and 12 months (74% vs 62%) in the daily home hemodialy- sis population compared to conventional dialysis population. Monthly mean albumin was consistent over time in the daily home hemodialysis population but gradually increased in the conventional dialysis population. Hemoglobin values were consistently lower over the follow-up period in the daily home hemodialysis population and ferritin values were similar in both populations. These results confirm and extend previous findings that daily home hemodialysis is associated with improved patient outcomes compared to conventional hemodialysis. Although difficult to conduct practically, a prospective randomized outcomes study evaluating daily home hemodialysis versus conventional TIW dialysis would be valuable in informing the standard of dialysis care in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let's get to work. Patient management Industry speaks.... Doctor issues on topic-for everyone. Collaboration key in winning NQF endorsement for medication management measure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1