{"title":"瑞士法郎的安全溢价。","authors":"Jessica Leutert","doi":"10.1186/s41937-017-0014-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper applies a recent method proposed by Maggiori (<i>The U.S. Dollar Safety Premium</i>, 2013) to estimate the Swiss franc safety premium. The results show that the three-step instrumental variable approach as used by Maggiori does not work for the Swiss franc exchange rates. The price of risk estimates take unrealistic, negative values. One possible explanation is that the approach as it is used by Maggiori suffers from a measurement error for the expected exchange rate which represents a potential source of imprecision. By using the prediction of an augmented Fama regression to measure the expected exchange rate change, this measurement error can be avoided and the safety premium estimates become more realistic and closer to those obtained with a maximum likelihood-estimated GARCH approach. Overall, however, the GARCH approach still seems to be preferable to the instrumental variable approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":36872,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics","volume":"154 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41937-017-0014-7","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Swiss franc safety premium.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Leutert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41937-017-0014-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper applies a recent method proposed by Maggiori (<i>The U.S. Dollar Safety Premium</i>, 2013) to estimate the Swiss franc safety premium. The results show that the three-step instrumental variable approach as used by Maggiori does not work for the Swiss franc exchange rates. The price of risk estimates take unrealistic, negative values. One possible explanation is that the approach as it is used by Maggiori suffers from a measurement error for the expected exchange rate which represents a potential source of imprecision. By using the prediction of an augmented Fama regression to measure the expected exchange rate change, this measurement error can be avoided and the safety premium estimates become more realistic and closer to those obtained with a maximum likelihood-estimated GARCH approach. Overall, however, the GARCH approach still seems to be preferable to the instrumental variable approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41937-017-0014-7\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-017-0014-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-017-0014-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
本文采用Maggiori (The U.S. Dollar Safety Premium, 2013)最近提出的方法来估算瑞士法郎的安全溢价。结果表明,Maggiori使用的三步工具变量方法不适用于瑞士法郎汇率。风险评估的代价是不切实际的,是负值。一种可能的解释是,马吉奥里使用的方法对预期汇率存在测量误差,这是不精确的潜在来源。通过使用增强法玛回归的预测来测量预期汇率变化,可以避免这种测量误差,并且安全溢价估计值变得更现实,更接近使用最大似然估计GARCH方法获得的估计值。然而,总的来说,GARCH方法似乎仍然优于工具变量方法。
This paper applies a recent method proposed by Maggiori (The U.S. Dollar Safety Premium, 2013) to estimate the Swiss franc safety premium. The results show that the three-step instrumental variable approach as used by Maggiori does not work for the Swiss franc exchange rates. The price of risk estimates take unrealistic, negative values. One possible explanation is that the approach as it is used by Maggiori suffers from a measurement error for the expected exchange rate which represents a potential source of imprecision. By using the prediction of an augmented Fama regression to measure the expected exchange rate change, this measurement error can be avoided and the safety premium estimates become more realistic and closer to those obtained with a maximum likelihood-estimated GARCH approach. Overall, however, the GARCH approach still seems to be preferable to the instrumental variable approach.