立体定向放射治疗晚期呼吸运动管理(呼吸门控或动态肿瘤跟踪)治疗I期非小细胞肺癌的临床结果

IF 5.1 Q1 ONCOLOGY Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2018-11-05 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LCTT.S175168
Paul Aridgides, Tamara Nsouli, Rishabh Chaudhari, Russell Kincaid, Paula F Rosenbaum, Sean Tanny, Michael Mix, Jeffrey Bogart
{"title":"立体定向放射治疗晚期呼吸运动管理(呼吸门控或动态肿瘤跟踪)治疗I期非小细胞肺癌的临床结果","authors":"Paul Aridgides,&nbsp;Tamara Nsouli,&nbsp;Rishabh Chaudhari,&nbsp;Russell Kincaid,&nbsp;Paula F Rosenbaum,&nbsp;Sean Tanny,&nbsp;Michael Mix,&nbsp;Jeffrey Bogart","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S175168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to respiratory motion management method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with stage I NSCLC who received SBRT from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) simulation with four-dimensional CT was performed for respiratory motion assessment. Tumor motion >1 cm in the craniocaudal direction was selectively treated with advanced respiratory management: either respiratory gating to a pre-specified portion of the respiratory cycle or dynamic tracking of an implanted fiducial marker. Comparisons were made with internal target volume approach, which treated all phases of respiratory motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 297 patients treated with SBRT at our institution, 51 underwent advanced respiratory management (48 with respiratory gating and three with tumor tracking) and 246 underwent all-phase treatment. Groups were similarly balanced with regard to mean age (<i>P</i>=0.242), tumor size (<i>P</i>=0.315), and histology (<i>P</i>=0.715). Tumor location in the lower lung lobes, as compared to middle or upper lobes, was more common in those treated with advanced respiratory management (78.4%) compared to all-phase treatment (25.6%, <i>P</i><.0001). There were 17 local recurrences in the treated lesions. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that there were no differences with regard to mean time to local failure (91.5 vs 98.8 months, <i>P</i>=0.56), mean time to any failure (73.2 vs 78.7 months, <i>P</i>=0.73), or median overall survival (43.3 vs 45.5 months, <i>P</i>=0.56) between patients who underwent advanced respiratory motion management and all-phase treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBRT with advanced respiratory management (the majority with respiratory gating) showed similar efficacy to all-phase treatment approach for stage I NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S175168","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes following advanced respiratory motion management (respiratory gating or dynamic tumor tracking) with stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Aridgides,&nbsp;Tamara Nsouli,&nbsp;Rishabh Chaudhari,&nbsp;Russell Kincaid,&nbsp;Paula F Rosenbaum,&nbsp;Sean Tanny,&nbsp;Michael Mix,&nbsp;Jeffrey Bogart\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/LCTT.S175168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to respiratory motion management method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with stage I NSCLC who received SBRT from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) simulation with four-dimensional CT was performed for respiratory motion assessment. Tumor motion >1 cm in the craniocaudal direction was selectively treated with advanced respiratory management: either respiratory gating to a pre-specified portion of the respiratory cycle or dynamic tracking of an implanted fiducial marker. Comparisons were made with internal target volume approach, which treated all phases of respiratory motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 297 patients treated with SBRT at our institution, 51 underwent advanced respiratory management (48 with respiratory gating and three with tumor tracking) and 246 underwent all-phase treatment. Groups were similarly balanced with regard to mean age (<i>P</i>=0.242), tumor size (<i>P</i>=0.315), and histology (<i>P</i>=0.715). Tumor location in the lower lung lobes, as compared to middle or upper lobes, was more common in those treated with advanced respiratory management (78.4%) compared to all-phase treatment (25.6%, <i>P</i><.0001). There were 17 local recurrences in the treated lesions. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that there were no differences with regard to mean time to local failure (91.5 vs 98.8 months, <i>P</i>=0.56), mean time to any failure (73.2 vs 78.7 months, <i>P</i>=0.73), or median overall survival (43.3 vs 45.5 months, <i>P</i>=0.56) between patients who underwent advanced respiratory motion management and all-phase treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBRT with advanced respiratory management (the majority with respiratory gating) showed similar efficacy to all-phase treatment approach for stage I NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S175168\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S175168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S175168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:报道基于呼吸运动管理方法的立体定向全身放射治疗(SBRT)治疗I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2007 - 2015年接受SBRT治疗的I期NSCLC患者。采用四维计算机断层扫描(CT)模拟呼吸运动评估。肿瘤在颅足方向运动> 1cm时,采用先进的呼吸管理方法进行选择性治疗:呼吸门控到预先指定的呼吸周期部分或植入基准标记物的动态跟踪。与治疗呼吸运动各阶段的内靶容积法进行比较。结果:在我院接受SBRT治疗的297例患者中,51例接受了高级呼吸管理(48例呼吸门控,3例肿瘤跟踪),246例接受了全期治疗。各组在平均年龄(P=0.242)、肿瘤大小(P=0.315)和组织学(P=0.715)方面的平衡相似。与中肺叶或上肺叶相比,晚期呼吸管理组(78.4%)比全期治疗组(25.6%,PP=0.56)更常见于下肺叶,接受晚期呼吸运动管理组和全期治疗组患者的平均衰竭时间(73.2 vs 78.7个月,P=0.73)或中位总生存期(43.3 vs 45.5个月,P=0.56)。结论:SBRT合并晚期呼吸管理(大多数合并呼吸门控)对I期NSCLC的疗效与全期治疗方法相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes following advanced respiratory motion management (respiratory gating or dynamic tumor tracking) with stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

Purpose: To report the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to respiratory motion management method.

Methods: Patients with stage I NSCLC who received SBRT from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) simulation with four-dimensional CT was performed for respiratory motion assessment. Tumor motion >1 cm in the craniocaudal direction was selectively treated with advanced respiratory management: either respiratory gating to a pre-specified portion of the respiratory cycle or dynamic tracking of an implanted fiducial marker. Comparisons were made with internal target volume approach, which treated all phases of respiratory motion.

Results: Of 297 patients treated with SBRT at our institution, 51 underwent advanced respiratory management (48 with respiratory gating and three with tumor tracking) and 246 underwent all-phase treatment. Groups were similarly balanced with regard to mean age (P=0.242), tumor size (P=0.315), and histology (P=0.715). Tumor location in the lower lung lobes, as compared to middle or upper lobes, was more common in those treated with advanced respiratory management (78.4%) compared to all-phase treatment (25.6%, P<.0001). There were 17 local recurrences in the treated lesions. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that there were no differences with regard to mean time to local failure (91.5 vs 98.8 months, P=0.56), mean time to any failure (73.2 vs 78.7 months, P=0.73), or median overall survival (43.3 vs 45.5 months, P=0.56) between patients who underwent advanced respiratory motion management and all-phase treatment.

Conclusion: SBRT with advanced respiratory management (the majority with respiratory gating) showed similar efficacy to all-phase treatment approach for stage I NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Spindle Cell Carcinoma Mimicking Granulomatous Inflammation: A Rare Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature. Redefining Recovery: The Transformative Impact of the ALINA Trial on Adjuvant Therapy for ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Mutation of MET D1228N as an Acquired Potential Mechanism of Crizotinib Resistance in NSCLC with MET Y1003H Mutation. Spotlight on Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) from HERTHENA Lung01. Is a Median PFS of 5.5 Months Enough in Light of FLAURA-2 and MARIPOSA? Top 20 EGFR+ NSCLC Clinical and Translational Science Papers That Shaped the 20 Years Since the Discovery of Activating EGFR Mutations in NSCLC. An Editor-in-Chief Expert Panel Consensus Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1