孟加拉成年患者连续动态腹膜透析的管理经验。

Sarwar Iqbal, M Masud Iqbal, Tufayel Ahmed Chowdhury, Md Abdur Rahim, Abu Sayed Muhammad Manzur Morshed Bhuiyan, Mehruba Alam Ananna, Md Ayub Ali Chowdhury, Rana Mokarram Hossain, Nurul Islam, Md Nurul Islam
{"title":"孟加拉成年患者连续动态腹膜透析的管理经验。","authors":"Sarwar Iqbal,&nbsp;M Masud Iqbal,&nbsp;Tufayel Ahmed Chowdhury,&nbsp;Md Abdur Rahim,&nbsp;Abu Sayed Muhammad Manzur Morshed Bhuiyan,&nbsp;Mehruba Alam Ananna,&nbsp;Md Ayub Ali Chowdhury,&nbsp;Rana Mokarram Hossain,&nbsp;Nurul Islam,&nbsp;Md Nurul Islam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is becoming increasingly known to the patients of Bangladesh, and patient numbers are increasing. Here, we report our experience and clinical outcomes in this field.Our analysis included all CAPD patients managed in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh between 2003 and 2015. All patients received a Tenckhoff double-cuff catheter by mini-laparotomy, and twin bags were used in most patients. In acute cases, regular exchanges were started manually with small-volume dwells the same or the next day.During the study period, 500 patients (mean age: 62 ± 18 years; 62% men; 86% percent with diabetes) were managed. Selection of CAPD was made by choice (47%) or for hemodynamic instability (32%), remote residence (17%), or poor vascular access (4%). Total duration of follow-up was 9364 patient-months (range: 1 - 78 months). The peritonitis rate was 1 episode in 30 patient-months. Fewer than 5% of patients required catheter removal. Similarly, the percentages of catheter tip migration and fluid leak were at the lower end. Patient survival was 68%, 48%, 38%, 22%, and 8% at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 years. Deaths were mostly attributable to vascular events.In a population with predominantly diabetic patients, CAPD was shown to be a viable mode of renal replacement therapy. The rates of peritonitis and catheter-related complications were low. Survival in the initial years can be considered acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":7361,"journal":{"name":"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":"34 2018","pages":"38-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience Managing Adult Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Bangladesh.\",\"authors\":\"Sarwar Iqbal,&nbsp;M Masud Iqbal,&nbsp;Tufayel Ahmed Chowdhury,&nbsp;Md Abdur Rahim,&nbsp;Abu Sayed Muhammad Manzur Morshed Bhuiyan,&nbsp;Mehruba Alam Ananna,&nbsp;Md Ayub Ali Chowdhury,&nbsp;Rana Mokarram Hossain,&nbsp;Nurul Islam,&nbsp;Md Nurul Islam\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is becoming increasingly known to the patients of Bangladesh, and patient numbers are increasing. Here, we report our experience and clinical outcomes in this field.Our analysis included all CAPD patients managed in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh between 2003 and 2015. All patients received a Tenckhoff double-cuff catheter by mini-laparotomy, and twin bags were used in most patients. In acute cases, regular exchanges were started manually with small-volume dwells the same or the next day.During the study period, 500 patients (mean age: 62 ± 18 years; 62% men; 86% percent with diabetes) were managed. Selection of CAPD was made by choice (47%) or for hemodynamic instability (32%), remote residence (17%), or poor vascular access (4%). Total duration of follow-up was 9364 patient-months (range: 1 - 78 months). The peritonitis rate was 1 episode in 30 patient-months. Fewer than 5% of patients required catheter removal. Similarly, the percentages of catheter tip migration and fluid leak were at the lower end. Patient survival was 68%, 48%, 38%, 22%, and 8% at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 years. Deaths were mostly attributable to vascular events.In a population with predominantly diabetic patients, CAPD was shown to be a viable mode of renal replacement therapy. The rates of peritonitis and catheter-related complications were low. Survival in the initial years can be considered acceptable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis\",\"volume\":\"34 2018\",\"pages\":\"38-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孟加拉国的患者越来越了解持续动态腹膜透析(CAPD),患者人数也在增加。在此,我们报告我们在该领域的经验和临床结果。我们的分析包括2003年至2015年间在孟加拉国一家三级护理医院管理的所有CAPD患者。所有患者均采用微型剖腹术置Tenckhoff双袖口导尿管,多数患者采用双气囊导尿管。在急性病例中,在当天或第二天用小容量的容器进行定期人工交换。在研究期间,500例患者(平均年龄:62±18岁;男性62%;(86%患有糖尿病)。CAPD的选择是由于选择性(47%)、血流动力学不稳定(32%)、远程居住(17%)或血管通路不良(4%)。随访总时间为9364个月(范围:1 - 78个月)。腹膜炎发生率为30个月1次。不到5%的患者需要拔除导管。同样,导管尖端移动和液体泄漏的百分比也较低。患者在1年、2年、3年、5年和7年的生存率分别为68%、48%、38%、22%和8%。死亡主要归因于血管事件。在以糖尿病患者为主的人群中,CAPD被证明是一种可行的肾脏替代治疗模式。腹膜炎及导管相关并发症发生率较低。最初几年的生存率是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experience Managing Adult Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Bangladesh.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is becoming increasingly known to the patients of Bangladesh, and patient numbers are increasing. Here, we report our experience and clinical outcomes in this field.Our analysis included all CAPD patients managed in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh between 2003 and 2015. All patients received a Tenckhoff double-cuff catheter by mini-laparotomy, and twin bags were used in most patients. In acute cases, regular exchanges were started manually with small-volume dwells the same or the next day.During the study period, 500 patients (mean age: 62 ± 18 years; 62% men; 86% percent with diabetes) were managed. Selection of CAPD was made by choice (47%) or for hemodynamic instability (32%), remote residence (17%), or poor vascular access (4%). Total duration of follow-up was 9364 patient-months (range: 1 - 78 months). The peritonitis rate was 1 episode in 30 patient-months. Fewer than 5% of patients required catheter removal. Similarly, the percentages of catheter tip migration and fluid leak were at the lower end. Patient survival was 68%, 48%, 38%, 22%, and 8% at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 years. Deaths were mostly attributable to vascular events.In a population with predominantly diabetic patients, CAPD was shown to be a viable mode of renal replacement therapy. The rates of peritonitis and catheter-related complications were low. Survival in the initial years can be considered acceptable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in Peritoneal Transport and Peritoneal Damage in Japanese Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis Using Neutral-pH Dialysate: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Two Centers. Maintaining Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: The Process of Incremental Prescription. Comparison of Various Scaling Parameters and Energy Expenditure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis Drop-Out. Accuracy of a Newly-Introduced Oscillometric Device for the Estimation of Arterial Stiffness Indices in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Preliminary Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1