镍钛旋转和往复式器械分离的临床研究综述。

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Open Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2018-10-25 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1745017901814010864
Marcelo Santos Coelho, Marcos de Azevêdo Rios, Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno
{"title":"镍钛旋转和往复式器械分离的临床研究综述。","authors":"Marcelo Santos Coelho,&nbsp;Marcos de Azevêdo Rios,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno","doi":"10.2174/1745017901814010864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to evaluate clinical studies that assessed separated NiTi rotary and reciprocating instruments.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>This review assessed clinical studies involving treatments performed by undergraduate students, graduate students, and endodontic specialists. This review evaluated studies using rotary instruments, reciprocating instruments, and hybrid techniques. The number of uses of the different NiTi rotary and reciprocating systems was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of separation for rotary instruments ranged from 0% to 23%. Rotary instruments were used from 1 to 50 times depending on the instrument and tooth type. The lowest rate of incidence separation for rotary instruments was obtained by undergraduate students, using a hybrid technique. The separation incidence for reciprocating instruments ranged from 0% to 1.71%. Reciprocating instruments were mostly single-used; one study reported their use up to 3 times. Separation rate in reciprocating instruments was similar in single-use or in multiple uses 0.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Separation of instruments has dropped recently and seems to be a minor problem in current Endodontics. Multiple uses of NiTi rotary instruments are a possibility without significantly increasing the risk of instrument separation. Single and multiple uses of NiTi reciprocating instruments are also associated with low incidence of separation. Attempting to remove separated instruments should be carefully evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47284,"journal":{"name":"Open Dentistry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1745017901814010864","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Separation of Nickel-Titanium Rotary and Reciprocating Instruments: A Mini-Review of Clinical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Santos Coelho,&nbsp;Marcos de Azevêdo Rios,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1745017901814010864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to evaluate clinical studies that assessed separated NiTi rotary and reciprocating instruments.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>This review assessed clinical studies involving treatments performed by undergraduate students, graduate students, and endodontic specialists. This review evaluated studies using rotary instruments, reciprocating instruments, and hybrid techniques. The number of uses of the different NiTi rotary and reciprocating systems was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of separation for rotary instruments ranged from 0% to 23%. Rotary instruments were used from 1 to 50 times depending on the instrument and tooth type. The lowest rate of incidence separation for rotary instruments was obtained by undergraduate students, using a hybrid technique. The separation incidence for reciprocating instruments ranged from 0% to 1.71%. Reciprocating instruments were mostly single-used; one study reported their use up to 3 times. Separation rate in reciprocating instruments was similar in single-use or in multiple uses 0.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Separation of instruments has dropped recently and seems to be a minor problem in current Endodontics. Multiple uses of NiTi rotary instruments are a possibility without significantly increasing the risk of instrument separation. Single and multiple uses of NiTi reciprocating instruments are also associated with low incidence of separation. Attempting to remove separated instruments should be carefully evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1745017901814010864\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901814010864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901814010864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的:本综述旨在评价分离NiTi旋转和往复式器械的临床研究。设计和方法:本综述评估了由本科生、研究生和牙髓专家进行的临床研究。本综述评估了使用旋转仪器、往复式仪器和混合技术的研究。不同镍钛旋转和往复系统的使用数量也进行了评估。结果:旋转器械的分离率为0% ~ 23%。根据器械和齿型的不同,旋转器械的使用次数从1到50次不等。使用混合技术的本科生获得了旋转式仪器的最低入射分离率。往复器械的分离率为0% ~ 1.71%。往复式仪器大多是一次性使用的;一项研究报告称,它们的使用次数高达3次。往复仪器的分离率在单次使用和多次使用时相似,分别为0.2%。结论:器械分离最近有所下降,似乎是目前牙髓学的一个小问题。NiTi旋转器械的多次使用是可能的,而不会显著增加器械分离的风险。NiTi往复仪器的单次和多次使用也与低分离发生率有关。尝试移除分离的器械时应仔细评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Separation of Nickel-Titanium Rotary and Reciprocating Instruments: A Mini-Review of Clinical Studies.

Objective: This review aimed to evaluate clinical studies that assessed separated NiTi rotary and reciprocating instruments.

Design and methods: This review assessed clinical studies involving treatments performed by undergraduate students, graduate students, and endodontic specialists. This review evaluated studies using rotary instruments, reciprocating instruments, and hybrid techniques. The number of uses of the different NiTi rotary and reciprocating systems was also assessed.

Results: The incidence of separation for rotary instruments ranged from 0% to 23%. Rotary instruments were used from 1 to 50 times depending on the instrument and tooth type. The lowest rate of incidence separation for rotary instruments was obtained by undergraduate students, using a hybrid technique. The separation incidence for reciprocating instruments ranged from 0% to 1.71%. Reciprocating instruments were mostly single-used; one study reported their use up to 3 times. Separation rate in reciprocating instruments was similar in single-use or in multiple uses 0.2%.

Conclusions: Separation of instruments has dropped recently and seems to be a minor problem in current Endodontics. Multiple uses of NiTi rotary instruments are a possibility without significantly increasing the risk of instrument separation. Single and multiple uses of NiTi reciprocating instruments are also associated with low incidence of separation. Attempting to remove separated instruments should be carefully evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Dentistry Journal
Open Dentistry Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Calculus as a Risk Factor for Periodontal Disease: Narrative Review on Treatment Indications When the Response to Scaling and Root Planing Is Inadequate. Caries Experience and Treatment Needs in Urban and Rural Environments in School-Age Children from Three Provinces of Ecuador: A Cross-Sectional Study Cannabidiol in Dentistry: A Scoping Review Effectiveness of 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride in Reducing Dentine Hypersensitivity on Exposed Root Surface in Older Chinese Adults: Study Protocol for a Randomised Double-Blind Study Challenges and Opportunities for Dental Education from COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1