Wilson C Lai, Brandon J Erickson, Ryan A Mlynarek, Dean Wang
{"title":"慢性外上髁炎:挑战与解决方案。","authors":"Wilson C Lai, Brandon J Erickson, Ryan A Mlynarek, Dean Wang","doi":"10.2147/OAJSM.S160974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a significant source of pain and dysfunction resulting from repetitive gripping or wrist extension, radial deviation, and/or forearm supination. Although most cases are self-limiting over several years, controversy exists regarding the best treatment strategy for chronic LE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical therapy (PT), shockwave therapy, and injections with corticosteroids or biologics are all conservative treatment options for LE. For refractory cases, surgical options include open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques. In this review, the current evidence behind these treatment strategies is presented. The data demonstrate that NSAIDs, PT, bracing, and shockwave therapy provide limited benefit for treating LE. Biologics such as platelet-rich plasma and autologous whole-blood injections may be superior to steroid injections in the long-term management of LE. Although the initial results are promising, larger comparative studies on stem cell injections are needed. For refractory LE, open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques are all highly effective, with no method seemingly superior over another. Arthroscopic and percutaneous approaches may result in faster recovery and earlier return to work.</p>","PeriodicalId":51644,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"243-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/fe/oajsm-9-243.PMC6214594.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic lateral epicondylitis: challenges and solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Wilson C Lai, Brandon J Erickson, Ryan A Mlynarek, Dean Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAJSM.S160974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a significant source of pain and dysfunction resulting from repetitive gripping or wrist extension, radial deviation, and/or forearm supination. Although most cases are self-limiting over several years, controversy exists regarding the best treatment strategy for chronic LE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical therapy (PT), shockwave therapy, and injections with corticosteroids or biologics are all conservative treatment options for LE. For refractory cases, surgical options include open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques. In this review, the current evidence behind these treatment strategies is presented. The data demonstrate that NSAIDs, PT, bracing, and shockwave therapy provide limited benefit for treating LE. Biologics such as platelet-rich plasma and autologous whole-blood injections may be superior to steroid injections in the long-term management of LE. Although the initial results are promising, larger comparative studies on stem cell injections are needed. For refractory LE, open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques are all highly effective, with no method seemingly superior over another. Arthroscopic and percutaneous approaches may result in faster recovery and earlier return to work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"243-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/fe/oajsm-9-243.PMC6214594.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S160974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S160974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
外上髁炎(LE)是反复抓握或伸腕、桡侧偏斜和/或前臂上举导致疼痛和功能障碍的重要原因。虽然大多数病例可在数年内自行缓解,但关于慢性外上髁炎的最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、物理疗法(PT)、冲击波疗法以及注射皮质类固醇或生物制剂都是治疗 LE 的保守疗法。对于难治性病例,手术治疗包括开放、关节镜和经皮技术。本综述介绍了这些治疗策略背后的现有证据。数据显示,非甾体抗炎药、PT、支具和冲击波疗法对治疗LE的益处有限。在LE的长期治疗中,富血小板血浆和自体全血注射等生物制剂可能优于类固醇注射。虽然初步结果很有希望,但还需要对干细胞注射进行更大规模的比较研究。对于难治性LE,开放、关节镜和经皮技术都非常有效,没有哪种方法似乎优于另一种方法。关节镜和经皮方法可使患者更快康复,更早重返工作岗位。
Chronic lateral epicondylitis: challenges and solutions.
Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a significant source of pain and dysfunction resulting from repetitive gripping or wrist extension, radial deviation, and/or forearm supination. Although most cases are self-limiting over several years, controversy exists regarding the best treatment strategy for chronic LE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical therapy (PT), shockwave therapy, and injections with corticosteroids or biologics are all conservative treatment options for LE. For refractory cases, surgical options include open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques. In this review, the current evidence behind these treatment strategies is presented. The data demonstrate that NSAIDs, PT, bracing, and shockwave therapy provide limited benefit for treating LE. Biologics such as platelet-rich plasma and autologous whole-blood injections may be superior to steroid injections in the long-term management of LE. Although the initial results are promising, larger comparative studies on stem cell injections are needed. For refractory LE, open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques are all highly effective, with no method seemingly superior over another. Arthroscopic and percutaneous approaches may result in faster recovery and earlier return to work.