在一项随机对照临床试验中,体外细胞疗法(ELAD®)与标准治疗在治疗中国急性慢性肝衰竭患者中的比较。

IF 2.6 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2018-11-16 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/HMER.S180246
Zhongping Duan, Shaojie Xin, Jing Zhang, Shaoli You, Yu Chen, Hongling Liu, Sujun Zheng, Zheng Li, Robert Ashley, Michael Millis
{"title":"在一项随机对照临床试验中,体外细胞疗法(ELAD®)与标准治疗在治疗中国急性慢性肝衰竭患者中的比较。","authors":"Zhongping Duan,&nbsp;Shaojie Xin,&nbsp;Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Shaoli You,&nbsp;Yu Chen,&nbsp;Hongling Liu,&nbsp;Sujun Zheng,&nbsp;Zheng Li,&nbsp;Robert Ashley,&nbsp;Michael Millis","doi":"10.2147/HMER.S180246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy of an extracorporeal cellular therapy (ELAD<sup>®</sup>) has been demonstrated in subjects with acute forms of liver failure. This study compared ELAD with standard of care in Chinese subjects with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), predominantly secondary to chronic viral hepatitis.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Subjects meeting eligibility criteria were randomized to either the ELAD group or the control group. All subjects received plasma exchange and venovenous hemofiltration and either ELAD treatment for 3-5 days, unless terminated early, along with standard of care or standard of care alone (control) and were then followed up for 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine subjects (ELAD subjects, 32; controls, 17) were randomized under this protocol. Kaplan-Meier analysis of transplant-free survival (TFS) revealed a significant difference in favor of ELAD vs control (<i>P</i>=0.049, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). There was a significant difference in TFS on day 28 in ELAD vs control (<i>P</i>=0.022). In a multiple regression model, the relationship between group assignment and outcome was significant (<i>P</i>=0.031) when changes in food intake and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at screening were included as additional independent variables. The duration of ELAD treatment alone was a significant predictor of TFS (<i>P</i>=0.043). Median time to a 5-point increase in MELD, transplant, or death was longer than 72 days with ELAD vs 26 days for control (<i>P</i>=0.036). Total bilirubin level decreased by 25% during ELAD treatment vs 37% increase in the control group (<i>P</i><0.001) over an equivalent period. Adverse events attributed to the ELAD system were expected and could be managed conservatively. Intergroup differences in certain vital signs and laboratory parameters were noted during treatment and generally resolved posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELAD treatment was well tolerated by Chinese subjects with ACLF, predominately secondary to chronic viral hepatitis. Results demonstrate a significant improvement in TFS in ELAD vs control groups in association with significant improvements in serum bilirubin levels presumably related to improvement in hepatic function.</p>","PeriodicalId":12917,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/HMER.S180246","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of extracorporeal cellular therapy (ELAD<sup>®</sup>) vs standard of care in a randomized controlled clinical trial in treating Chinese subjects with acute-on-chronic liver failure.\",\"authors\":\"Zhongping Duan,&nbsp;Shaojie Xin,&nbsp;Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Shaoli You,&nbsp;Yu Chen,&nbsp;Hongling Liu,&nbsp;Sujun Zheng,&nbsp;Zheng Li,&nbsp;Robert Ashley,&nbsp;Michael Millis\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/HMER.S180246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy of an extracorporeal cellular therapy (ELAD<sup>®</sup>) has been demonstrated in subjects with acute forms of liver failure. This study compared ELAD with standard of care in Chinese subjects with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), predominantly secondary to chronic viral hepatitis.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Subjects meeting eligibility criteria were randomized to either the ELAD group or the control group. All subjects received plasma exchange and venovenous hemofiltration and either ELAD treatment for 3-5 days, unless terminated early, along with standard of care or standard of care alone (control) and were then followed up for 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine subjects (ELAD subjects, 32; controls, 17) were randomized under this protocol. Kaplan-Meier analysis of transplant-free survival (TFS) revealed a significant difference in favor of ELAD vs control (<i>P</i>=0.049, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). There was a significant difference in TFS on day 28 in ELAD vs control (<i>P</i>=0.022). In a multiple regression model, the relationship between group assignment and outcome was significant (<i>P</i>=0.031) when changes in food intake and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at screening were included as additional independent variables. The duration of ELAD treatment alone was a significant predictor of TFS (<i>P</i>=0.043). Median time to a 5-point increase in MELD, transplant, or death was longer than 72 days with ELAD vs 26 days for control (<i>P</i>=0.036). Total bilirubin level decreased by 25% during ELAD treatment vs 37% increase in the control group (<i>P</i><0.001) over an equivalent period. Adverse events attributed to the ELAD system were expected and could be managed conservatively. Intergroup differences in certain vital signs and laboratory parameters were noted during treatment and generally resolved posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELAD treatment was well tolerated by Chinese subjects with ACLF, predominately secondary to chronic viral hepatitis. Results demonstrate a significant improvement in TFS in ELAD vs control groups in association with significant improvements in serum bilirubin levels presumably related to improvement in hepatic function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/HMER.S180246\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S180246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S180246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:一种体外细胞疗法(ELAD®)在急性肝衰竭患者中的安全性和有效性的初步证据已经得到证实。这项研究比较了ELAD与中国急性慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者的标准治疗,ACLF主要继发于慢性病毒性肝炎。受试者和方法:符合资格标准的受试者被随机分为ELAD组或对照组。所有受试者均接受血浆置换、静脉静脉血液滤过和ELAD治疗3-5天,除非早期终止,同时接受标准治疗或单独标准治疗(对照组),然后随访12周。结果:49名受试者(ELAD受试者32名;对照组(17名)按照该方案随机分组。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,ELAD组与对照组相比,无移植生存期(TFS)有显著差异(P=0.049, Wilcoxon sign -rank检验)。与对照组相比,ELAD组第28天的TFS有显著差异(P=0.022)。在多元回归模型中,当食物摄入量的变化和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分作为额外的自变量纳入筛查时,组分配与结果之间的关系显著(P=0.031)。单独ELAD治疗的持续时间是TFS的显著预测因子(P=0.043)。MELD、移植或死亡增加5个点的中位时间在ELAD组大于72天,而对照组为26天(P=0.036)。在ELAD治疗期间,总胆红素水平下降了25%,而对照组则上升了37%。结论:中国ACLF患者对ELAD治疗耐受良好,主要是继发于慢性病毒性肝炎。结果显示,与对照组相比,ELAD组TFS显著改善,血清胆红素水平显著改善,可能与肝功能改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of extracorporeal cellular therapy (ELAD®) vs standard of care in a randomized controlled clinical trial in treating Chinese subjects with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Background: Preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy of an extracorporeal cellular therapy (ELAD®) has been demonstrated in subjects with acute forms of liver failure. This study compared ELAD with standard of care in Chinese subjects with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), predominantly secondary to chronic viral hepatitis.

Subjects and methods: Subjects meeting eligibility criteria were randomized to either the ELAD group or the control group. All subjects received plasma exchange and venovenous hemofiltration and either ELAD treatment for 3-5 days, unless terminated early, along with standard of care or standard of care alone (control) and were then followed up for 12 weeks.

Results: Forty-nine subjects (ELAD subjects, 32; controls, 17) were randomized under this protocol. Kaplan-Meier analysis of transplant-free survival (TFS) revealed a significant difference in favor of ELAD vs control (P=0.049, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). There was a significant difference in TFS on day 28 in ELAD vs control (P=0.022). In a multiple regression model, the relationship between group assignment and outcome was significant (P=0.031) when changes in food intake and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at screening were included as additional independent variables. The duration of ELAD treatment alone was a significant predictor of TFS (P=0.043). Median time to a 5-point increase in MELD, transplant, or death was longer than 72 days with ELAD vs 26 days for control (P=0.036). Total bilirubin level decreased by 25% during ELAD treatment vs 37% increase in the control group (P<0.001) over an equivalent period. Adverse events attributed to the ELAD system were expected and could be managed conservatively. Intergroup differences in certain vital signs and laboratory parameters were noted during treatment and generally resolved posttreatment.

Conclusion: ELAD treatment was well tolerated by Chinese subjects with ACLF, predominately secondary to chronic viral hepatitis. Results demonstrate a significant improvement in TFS in ELAD vs control groups in association with significant improvements in serum bilirubin levels presumably related to improvement in hepatic function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric hepatology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of hepatic disease Investigation and treatment of hepatic disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of hepatic disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered. As of 1st April 2019, Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Highlighting Hepatopulmonary Syndrome: An Important Consideration in Decompensated Cirrhosis [Letter]. Direct Ingestion of Oxidized Red Blood Cells (Efferocytosis) by Hepatocytes. Retrospective Database Analysis of Liver-Related Clinical Events in Adult and Pediatric Patients with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency in the United States. Synchronous Double Primary Tumors of Liver (Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Hepatocellular carcinoma): A Case Report Chimeric Livers: Interspecies Blastocyst Complementation and Xenotransplantation for End-Stage Liver Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1