Yusuf Yazici, Lin Xie, Adesuwa Ogbomo, Lorie A Ellis, Kavitha Goyal, Amanda Teeple, Ismail Simsek
{"title":"在匹配的风湿病人群中继续创新英夫利昔单抗治疗或切换到英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药的现实世界治疗模式分析。","authors":"Yusuf Yazici, Lin Xie, Adesuwa Ogbomo, Lorie A Ellis, Kavitha Goyal, Amanda Teeple, Ismail Simsek","doi":"10.2147/BTT.S172337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared treatment patterns of Turkish patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with innovator Remicade<sup>®</sup> (infliximab [IFX]) and either continued IFX or switched to CT-P13.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adult RA patients with ≥1 IFX claim were identified from the Turkish Ministry of Health database. Eligible patients initiated and continued IFX treatment (continuers cohort [CC]) or initiated IFX and switched to CT-P13 (switchers cohort [SC]) during the study period. The initial IFX claim date was defined as the index date. The switch/reference date was defined as the CT-P13 switch date for the SC or a random IFX date during the period of CT-P13 availability for the CC. Cohorts were matched by age, sex, and number of IFX prescriptions during baseline. Patient demographics, discontinuation, and switching were summarized. The baseline period was defined as the period from the index date to the switch/reference date. The follow-up period ranged from the switch/reference date to the end of data availability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 697 patients were selected: 605 patients for the CC and 92 patients for the SC. Mean IFX duration for the baseline period was 422 days in the CC and 438 days in the SC. Median time on any infused tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy was 1,080 days in the CC and 540 days in the SC during the study period. During the follow-up period, discontinuation was lower in the CC (CC=33.9% vs SC=87.5%; <i>P</i><0.001). The mean time to discontinuation was longer in the CC (CC=276 days vs SC=132 days; <i>P</i><0.001). A switch to another biologic medication during the follow-up period was observed in 19.0% of patients in the CC (n=115) and 81.5% of patients in the SC (n=75; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment patterns differed between patients prescribed IFX and CT-P13. In Turkey, RA patients maintained on IFX had greater treatment persistence (ie, fewer and later discontinuations) than those who initiated IFX and switched to CT-P13.</p>","PeriodicalId":9025,"journal":{"name":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","volume":"12 ","pages":"127-134"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/BTT.S172337","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of real-world treatment patterns in a matched rheumatology population that continued innovator infliximab therapy or switched to biosimilar infliximab.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Yazici, Lin Xie, Adesuwa Ogbomo, Lorie A Ellis, Kavitha Goyal, Amanda Teeple, Ismail Simsek\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/BTT.S172337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared treatment patterns of Turkish patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with innovator Remicade<sup>®</sup> (infliximab [IFX]) and either continued IFX or switched to CT-P13.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adult RA patients with ≥1 IFX claim were identified from the Turkish Ministry of Health database. Eligible patients initiated and continued IFX treatment (continuers cohort [CC]) or initiated IFX and switched to CT-P13 (switchers cohort [SC]) during the study period. The initial IFX claim date was defined as the index date. The switch/reference date was defined as the CT-P13 switch date for the SC or a random IFX date during the period of CT-P13 availability for the CC. Cohorts were matched by age, sex, and number of IFX prescriptions during baseline. Patient demographics, discontinuation, and switching were summarized. The baseline period was defined as the period from the index date to the switch/reference date. The follow-up period ranged from the switch/reference date to the end of data availability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 697 patients were selected: 605 patients for the CC and 92 patients for the SC. Mean IFX duration for the baseline period was 422 days in the CC and 438 days in the SC. Median time on any infused tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy was 1,080 days in the CC and 540 days in the SC during the study period. During the follow-up period, discontinuation was lower in the CC (CC=33.9% vs SC=87.5%; <i>P</i><0.001). The mean time to discontinuation was longer in the CC (CC=276 days vs SC=132 days; <i>P</i><0.001). A switch to another biologic medication during the follow-up period was observed in 19.0% of patients in the CC (n=115) and 81.5% of patients in the SC (n=75; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment patterns differed between patients prescribed IFX and CT-P13. In Turkey, RA patients maintained on IFX had greater treatment persistence (ie, fewer and later discontinuations) than those who initiated IFX and switched to CT-P13.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biologics : Targets & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"127-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/BTT.S172337\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biologics : Targets & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S172337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S172337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
目的:本研究比较了诊断为类风湿性关节炎(RA)的土耳其患者的治疗模式,这些患者接受了创新药物Remicade®(英夫利昔单抗[IFX])治疗,要么继续IFX治疗,要么改用CT-P13治疗。材料和方法:从土耳其卫生部数据库中确定IFX≥1的成年RA患者。符合条件的患者在研究期间开始并继续IFX治疗(连续性队列[CC])或开始IFX治疗并切换到CT-P13(切换队列[SC])。初始IFX索赔日期被定义为索引日期。切换/参考日期定义为SC的CT-P13切换日期或CC在CT-P13可用期间的随机IFX日期。队列按年龄、性别和基线期间IFX处方的数量进行匹配。总结了患者人口统计、停药和切换。基线期定义为从索引日期到切换/参考日期的期间。随访期间从转换/参考日期到数据可用性结束。结果:匹配后,697名患者被选中:605名CC患者和92名SC患者。基线期的平均IFX持续时间在CC中为422天,在SC中为438天。在研究期间,任何输注肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)拮抗剂治疗的中位时间在CC中为1080天,在SC中为540天。在随访期间,CC组的停药率较低(CC=33.9% vs SC=87.5%;结论:IFX与CT-P13治疗方式存在差异。在土耳其,维持IFX治疗的RA患者比那些开始使用IFX并转而使用CT-P13的患者有更大的治疗持久性(即更少和更晚的停药)。
Analysis of real-world treatment patterns in a matched rheumatology population that continued innovator infliximab therapy or switched to biosimilar infliximab.
Purpose: This study compared treatment patterns of Turkish patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with innovator Remicade® (infliximab [IFX]) and either continued IFX or switched to CT-P13.
Materials and methods: Adult RA patients with ≥1 IFX claim were identified from the Turkish Ministry of Health database. Eligible patients initiated and continued IFX treatment (continuers cohort [CC]) or initiated IFX and switched to CT-P13 (switchers cohort [SC]) during the study period. The initial IFX claim date was defined as the index date. The switch/reference date was defined as the CT-P13 switch date for the SC or a random IFX date during the period of CT-P13 availability for the CC. Cohorts were matched by age, sex, and number of IFX prescriptions during baseline. Patient demographics, discontinuation, and switching were summarized. The baseline period was defined as the period from the index date to the switch/reference date. The follow-up period ranged from the switch/reference date to the end of data availability.
Results: After matching, 697 patients were selected: 605 patients for the CC and 92 patients for the SC. Mean IFX duration for the baseline period was 422 days in the CC and 438 days in the SC. Median time on any infused tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy was 1,080 days in the CC and 540 days in the SC during the study period. During the follow-up period, discontinuation was lower in the CC (CC=33.9% vs SC=87.5%; P<0.001). The mean time to discontinuation was longer in the CC (CC=276 days vs SC=132 days; P<0.001). A switch to another biologic medication during the follow-up period was observed in 19.0% of patients in the CC (n=115) and 81.5% of patients in the SC (n=75; P<0.001).
Conclusion: Treatment patterns differed between patients prescribed IFX and CT-P13. In Turkey, RA patients maintained on IFX had greater treatment persistence (ie, fewer and later discontinuations) than those who initiated IFX and switched to CT-P13.