回肠袢造口早期和晚期闭合:回顾性比较结果分析。

Q2 Nursing Ostomy Wound Management Pub Date : 2018-12-01
Sala Abdalla, Rosaria Scarpinata
{"title":"回肠袢造口早期和晚期闭合:回顾性比较结果分析。","authors":"Sala Abdalla,&nbsp;Rosaria Scarpinata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal timing of loop ileostomy reversal remains largely unknown, but evidence that delayed ileostomy closure may increase postoperative complication rates is increasing.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Retrospective research was conducted to compare outcomes between patients who had early (<6 months) or late (>6 months) loop ileostomy closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients >18 years of age who underwent circumstomal reversal of a loop ileostomy over a period of 5 years in 1 hospital's colorectal unit were abstracted and analyzed. Data from patients who had a planned or conversion to laparotomy, a concurrent bowel resection, reversal of double-barrel small bowel and colonic stomas, or closure of an end ileostomy or patients whose records were incomplete were excluded. Demographic information, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, primary operation indication, surgery and inpatient dates, readmission within 30 days of discharge, reasons for readmission, complication type, and Clavien-Dindo classification were extracted and compared between early and late closure groups using independent-sample t test and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 75 study participants, 25 had an early closure (mean age 68.6 [range 26 - 93] years, mean time since primary surgery 3.8 months) and 50 had a late closure procedure (mean age 71.6 [range 46 - 93] years, mean time since primary surgery 12.8 months). Gender distribution, ASA grades, primary surgery indication, and total number of readmissions were similar between the 2 groups. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter (5.5 days vs 9.4 days; P = .01) and average number of complications was significantly lower (0.33 vs 0.61; P = .04) in the early closure group. Rates of postoperative ileus, anastomotic bleed, and wound-related complications were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospital length of stay and average number of postoperative complications following circumstomal loop ileostomy closure were significantly lower in the early than in the late closure group. Additional studies are warranted to help guide practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54656,"journal":{"name":"Ostomy Wound Management","volume":"64 12","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early and Late Closure of Loop Ileostomies: A Retrospective Comparative Outcomes Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sala Abdalla,&nbsp;Rosaria Scarpinata\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The optimal timing of loop ileostomy reversal remains largely unknown, but evidence that delayed ileostomy closure may increase postoperative complication rates is increasing.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Retrospective research was conducted to compare outcomes between patients who had early (<6 months) or late (>6 months) loop ileostomy closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients >18 years of age who underwent circumstomal reversal of a loop ileostomy over a period of 5 years in 1 hospital's colorectal unit were abstracted and analyzed. Data from patients who had a planned or conversion to laparotomy, a concurrent bowel resection, reversal of double-barrel small bowel and colonic stomas, or closure of an end ileostomy or patients whose records were incomplete were excluded. Demographic information, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, primary operation indication, surgery and inpatient dates, readmission within 30 days of discharge, reasons for readmission, complication type, and Clavien-Dindo classification were extracted and compared between early and late closure groups using independent-sample t test and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 75 study participants, 25 had an early closure (mean age 68.6 [range 26 - 93] years, mean time since primary surgery 3.8 months) and 50 had a late closure procedure (mean age 71.6 [range 46 - 93] years, mean time since primary surgery 12.8 months). Gender distribution, ASA grades, primary surgery indication, and total number of readmissions were similar between the 2 groups. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter (5.5 days vs 9.4 days; P = .01) and average number of complications was significantly lower (0.33 vs 0.61; P = .04) in the early closure group. Rates of postoperative ileus, anastomotic bleed, and wound-related complications were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospital length of stay and average number of postoperative complications following circumstomal loop ileostomy closure were significantly lower in the early than in the late closure group. Additional studies are warranted to help guide practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ostomy Wound Management\",\"volume\":\"64 12\",\"pages\":\"30-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ostomy Wound Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ostomy Wound Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回肠袢造口逆转的最佳时机仍不清楚,但有证据表明,延迟回肠造口关闭可能会增加术后并发症的发生率。目的:回顾性研究比较早期(6个月)回肠造口术患者的预后。方法:对1所医院结直肠科5年来收治的>18岁回肠环形造口术患者的病例进行总结分析。排除了计划或转换为剖腹手术、同期肠切除术、双管小肠和结肠造口逆转、末端回肠造口闭合或记录不完整的患者的数据。提取患者的人口学信息、美国麻醉学会(ASA)分级、主要手术指征、手术及住院时间、出院30天内再入院、再入院原因、并发症类型、Clavien-Dindo分类,采用独立样本t检验和Fisher精确检验比较早、晚闭合组患者的差异。结果:在75名研究参与者中,25名患者早期闭合(平均年龄68.6[范围26 - 93]岁,平均手术后3.8个月),50名患者晚期闭合(平均年龄71.6[范围46 - 93]岁,平均手术后12.8个月)。两组患者的性别分布、ASA分级、主要手术指征和再入院总人数相似。住院时间明显缩短(5.5天vs 9.4天;P = 0.01),平均并发症数显著低于对照组(0.33 vs 0.61;P = .04)。术后肠梗阻、吻合口出血及伤口相关并发症发生率无显著差异。结论:早期环口回肠造口术后住院时间和术后平均并发症数明显低于晚期组。额外的研究是必要的,以帮助指导实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early and Late Closure of Loop Ileostomies: A Retrospective Comparative Outcomes Analysis.

The optimal timing of loop ileostomy reversal remains largely unknown, but evidence that delayed ileostomy closure may increase postoperative complication rates is increasing.

Purpose: Retrospective research was conducted to compare outcomes between patients who had early (<6 months) or late (>6 months) loop ileostomy closure.

Methods: Records of patients >18 years of age who underwent circumstomal reversal of a loop ileostomy over a period of 5 years in 1 hospital's colorectal unit were abstracted and analyzed. Data from patients who had a planned or conversion to laparotomy, a concurrent bowel resection, reversal of double-barrel small bowel and colonic stomas, or closure of an end ileostomy or patients whose records were incomplete were excluded. Demographic information, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, primary operation indication, surgery and inpatient dates, readmission within 30 days of discharge, reasons for readmission, complication type, and Clavien-Dindo classification were extracted and compared between early and late closure groups using independent-sample t test and Fisher's exact test.

Results: Among the 75 study participants, 25 had an early closure (mean age 68.6 [range 26 - 93] years, mean time since primary surgery 3.8 months) and 50 had a late closure procedure (mean age 71.6 [range 46 - 93] years, mean time since primary surgery 12.8 months). Gender distribution, ASA grades, primary surgery indication, and total number of readmissions were similar between the 2 groups. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter (5.5 days vs 9.4 days; P = .01) and average number of complications was significantly lower (0.33 vs 0.61; P = .04) in the early closure group. Rates of postoperative ileus, anastomotic bleed, and wound-related complications were not significantly different.

Conclusion: Hospital length of stay and average number of postoperative complications following circumstomal loop ileostomy closure were significantly lower in the early than in the late closure group. Additional studies are warranted to help guide practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ostomy Wound Management
Ostomy Wound Management 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.99
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ostomy/Wound Management was founded in March of 1980 as "Ostomy Management." In 1985, this small journal dramatically expanded its content and readership by embracing the overlapping disciplines of ostomy care, wound care, incontinence care, and related skin and nutritional issues and became the premier journal of its kind. Ostomy/Wound Managements" readers include healthcare professionals from multiple disciplines. Today, our readers benefit from contemporary and comprehensive review and research papers that are practical, clinically oriented, and cutting edge. Each published article undergoes a rigorous double-blind peer review by members of both the Editorial Advisory Board and the Ad-Hoc Peer Review Panel.
期刊最新文献
Pyoderma gangrenosum and peripheral arterial disease: a case series and literature review Time to refocus on the principles of lower limb ulceration management EWMA 2023 Conference abstracts Effects of local antibiotics in calcium-sulphate granules for the treatment of diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis: a propensity-matched observational study Organisation of NPWT in primary care in Europe – a descriptive survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1