终末期肾病接受血液透析治疗的hiv感染与非hiv感染患者中心静脉导管相关性菌血症的患病率和结局

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine Pub Date : 2018-11-22 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.859
Nuria Avila-Danguillecourt, Anand A Moodley, Polycarpe Makinga
{"title":"终末期肾病接受血液透析治疗的hiv感染与非hiv感染患者中心静脉导管相关性菌血症的患病率和结局","authors":"Nuria Avila-Danguillecourt,&nbsp;Anand A Moodley,&nbsp;Polycarpe Makinga","doi":"10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central venous catheter (CVC) haemodialysis (HD) to implement renal replacement therapy is the preferred choice in the urgent setting. Unfortunately, CVC placement is associated with multiple complications including nosocomial bloodstream infections. There is a paucity of data on the prevalence and pattern of pathogenic organisms in haemodialysed HIV-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients with end-stage kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Method and results: </strong>We undertook a retrospective study of 228 patients who were dialysed using a CVC at a tertiary referral hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Seventy-eight patients (34.2%) complicated with bacteraemia and sepsis requiring antibiotics. Removal of the catheter was necessary in 58 patients (74.0%). The most common organisms isolated were <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (30.8%), <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> (24.4%) and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (15.4%). There was no statistically significant difference between HIV-infected and non-infected patients with regards to infection rate, time interval from insertion of CVC to infection and final outcome. However, HIV-infected patients took longer to recover; 54.3% of non-infected patients versus 10.3% HIV-infected patients had their sepsis controlled within one week. Acidosis, hypotension, line malfunction and line discharge were infrequent signs of sepsis. Fever, rigors and raised white cell count occurred in over 80.0% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The infection rate in CVC HD is not more frequent in HIV-infected patients, provided that CD4+ count is ≥ 200 cells/µL and the patient is virologically suppressed. Outcomes following intravenous antibiotic and removal of the CVC are similar in HIV-infected and non-infected patients but response to treatment is slower in HIV-infected patients. A high index of suspicion is needed in detecting CVC-related bacteraemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":49489,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.859","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and outcomes of central venous catheter-related bacteraemia in HIV-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients undergoing haemodialysis treatment for end-stage kidney disease.\",\"authors\":\"Nuria Avila-Danguillecourt,&nbsp;Anand A Moodley,&nbsp;Polycarpe Makinga\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central venous catheter (CVC) haemodialysis (HD) to implement renal replacement therapy is the preferred choice in the urgent setting. Unfortunately, CVC placement is associated with multiple complications including nosocomial bloodstream infections. There is a paucity of data on the prevalence and pattern of pathogenic organisms in haemodialysed HIV-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients with end-stage kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Method and results: </strong>We undertook a retrospective study of 228 patients who were dialysed using a CVC at a tertiary referral hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Seventy-eight patients (34.2%) complicated with bacteraemia and sepsis requiring antibiotics. Removal of the catheter was necessary in 58 patients (74.0%). The most common organisms isolated were <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (30.8%), <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> (24.4%) and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (15.4%). There was no statistically significant difference between HIV-infected and non-infected patients with regards to infection rate, time interval from insertion of CVC to infection and final outcome. However, HIV-infected patients took longer to recover; 54.3% of non-infected patients versus 10.3% HIV-infected patients had their sepsis controlled within one week. Acidosis, hypotension, line malfunction and line discharge were infrequent signs of sepsis. Fever, rigors and raised white cell count occurred in over 80.0% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The infection rate in CVC HD is not more frequent in HIV-infected patients, provided that CD4+ count is ≥ 200 cells/µL and the patient is virologically suppressed. Outcomes following intravenous antibiotic and removal of the CVC are similar in HIV-infected and non-infected patients but response to treatment is slower in HIV-infected patients. A high index of suspicion is needed in detecting CVC-related bacteraemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.859\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.859\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中心静脉导管(CVC)血液透析(HD)实施肾脏替代治疗是紧急情况下的首选。不幸的是,CVC放置与包括院内血流感染在内的多种并发症有关。在血液透析的终末期肾病患者中,hiv感染与非hiv感染的致病性生物体的流行率和模式缺乏数据。方法和结果:我们对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省一家三级转诊医院使用CVC进行透析的228例患者进行了回顾性研究。78例(34.2%)合并菌血症和败血症需要抗生素治疗。58例(74.0%)患者需要拔除导管。最常见的细菌是金黄色葡萄球菌(30.8%)、表皮葡萄球菌(24.4%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(15.4%)。hiv感染者与非感染者在感染率、注射CVC至感染的时间间隔及最终结局方面均无统计学差异。然而,感染艾滋病毒的患者需要更长的时间才能康复;54.3%的未感染患者和10.3%的hiv感染患者的败血症在一周内得到控制。酸中毒、低血压、管道故障和管道排出是脓毒症的罕见症状。超过80.0%的患者出现发热、僵直和白细胞计数升高。结论:只要CD4+计数≥200 cells/µL,并对患者进行病毒学抑制,CVC HD的感染率在hiv感染患者中并不高。在hiv感染患者和非hiv感染患者中,静脉注射抗生素和去除CVC的结果相似,但hiv感染患者对治疗的反应较慢。在检测cvc相关菌血症时需要高度的怀疑指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and outcomes of central venous catheter-related bacteraemia in HIV-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients undergoing haemodialysis treatment for end-stage kidney disease.

Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) haemodialysis (HD) to implement renal replacement therapy is the preferred choice in the urgent setting. Unfortunately, CVC placement is associated with multiple complications including nosocomial bloodstream infections. There is a paucity of data on the prevalence and pattern of pathogenic organisms in haemodialysed HIV-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Method and results: We undertook a retrospective study of 228 patients who were dialysed using a CVC at a tertiary referral hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Seventy-eight patients (34.2%) complicated with bacteraemia and sepsis requiring antibiotics. Removal of the catheter was necessary in 58 patients (74.0%). The most common organisms isolated were Staphylococcus aureus (30.8%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (24.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.4%). There was no statistically significant difference between HIV-infected and non-infected patients with regards to infection rate, time interval from insertion of CVC to infection and final outcome. However, HIV-infected patients took longer to recover; 54.3% of non-infected patients versus 10.3% HIV-infected patients had their sepsis controlled within one week. Acidosis, hypotension, line malfunction and line discharge were infrequent signs of sepsis. Fever, rigors and raised white cell count occurred in over 80.0% of patients.

Conclusion: The infection rate in CVC HD is not more frequent in HIV-infected patients, provided that CD4+ count is ≥ 200 cells/µL and the patient is virologically suppressed. Outcomes following intravenous antibiotic and removal of the CVC are similar in HIV-infected and non-infected patients but response to treatment is slower in HIV-infected patients. A high index of suspicion is needed in detecting CVC-related bacteraemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine is focused on HIV/AIDS treatment, prevention and related topics relevant to clinical and public health practice. The purpose of the journal is to disseminate original research results and to support high-level learning related to HIV Medicine. It publishes original research articles, editorials, case reports/case series, reviews of state-of-the-art clinical practice, and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes and characteristics of patients on protease inhibitors at a tertiary level antiretroviral clinic Rural nurses' antiretroviral prescribing practices in children, Limpopo province, South Africa. The prevalence of cervical abnormalities: Comparison of youth with perinatally acquired HIV and older women in Botswana. Effect of HIV on mortality among hospitalised patients in South Africa. An audit of adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines in a tertiary-level HIV clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1