Areg Grigorian MD, Megumi Sugimoto BS, Victor Joe MD, Sebastian Schubl MD, Michael Lekawa MD, Matthew Dolich MD, Eric Kuncir MD, Cristobal Barrios Jr. MD, Jeffry Nahmias MD, MHPE
{"title":"创伤患者压疮:脊髓损伤程度越高,发生压疮的风险越高","authors":"Areg Grigorian MD, Megumi Sugimoto BS, Victor Joe MD, Sebastian Schubl MD, Michael Lekawa MD, Matthew Dolich MD, Eric Kuncir MD, Cristobal Barrios Jr. MD, Jeffry Nahmias MD, MHPE","doi":"10.1016/j.jccw.2018.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In a systematic review<span>, the level of spinal cord injury<span> (SCI) was not associated with risk for pressure ulcer (PU). We hypothesized that in the acute trauma population, upper-SCI (cervical/thoracic) has greater risk for PU when compared to lower-SCI (lumbar/sacral). We additionally sought to identify risk factors for development of PUs in trauma.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of the NTDB (2007–2015) was performed. Covariates were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine risk for PU.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 62,929 patients (0.9%) with SCI, most had an upper-SCI (83%). The overall rate of PUs in patients with SCI was 5.1%. More patients with upper-SCI developed PUs compared to lower-SCI (5.8% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001). SCI was the strongest predictor for PU (OR = 13.77, CI = 13.25–14.31, p < 0.001). Upper-SCI demonstrated greater risk compared to lower-SCI (OR = 2.81, CI = 2.45–3.22, p < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Contrary to previous reports, a higher SCI level is associated with a three-fold greater risk for PU compared to lower SCI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90358,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jccw.2018.06.001","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure Ulcer in Trauma Patients: A Higher Spinal Cord Injury Level Leads to Higher Risk\",\"authors\":\"Areg Grigorian MD, Megumi Sugimoto BS, Victor Joe MD, Sebastian Schubl MD, Michael Lekawa MD, Matthew Dolich MD, Eric Kuncir MD, Cristobal Barrios Jr. MD, Jeffry Nahmias MD, MHPE\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jccw.2018.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In a systematic review<span>, the level of spinal cord injury<span> (SCI) was not associated with risk for pressure ulcer (PU). We hypothesized that in the acute trauma population, upper-SCI (cervical/thoracic) has greater risk for PU when compared to lower-SCI (lumbar/sacral). We additionally sought to identify risk factors for development of PUs in trauma.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of the NTDB (2007–2015) was performed. Covariates were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine risk for PU.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 62,929 patients (0.9%) with SCI, most had an upper-SCI (83%). The overall rate of PUs in patients with SCI was 5.1%. More patients with upper-SCI developed PUs compared to lower-SCI (5.8% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001). SCI was the strongest predictor for PU (OR = 13.77, CI = 13.25–14.31, p < 0.001). Upper-SCI demonstrated greater risk compared to lower-SCI (OR = 2.81, CI = 2.45–3.22, p < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Contrary to previous reports, a higher SCI level is associated with a three-fold greater risk for PU compared to lower SCI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jccw.2018.06.001\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213510318300356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213510318300356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
摘要
在一项系统综述中,脊髓损伤(SCI)的水平与压疮(PU)的风险无关。我们假设,在急性创伤人群中,上段脊髓损伤(颈椎/胸椎)比下段脊髓损伤(腰椎/骶骨)有更大的PU风险。我们还试图确定创伤脓毒症发展的危险因素。方法对2007-2015年NTDB病例进行回顾性分析。协变量包括在多变量逻辑回归分析中,以确定PU的风险。结果在62,929例(0.9%)脊髓损伤患者中,大多数为上肢脊髓损伤(83%)。脊髓损伤患者脓毒症的总体发生率为5.1%。上肢脊髓损伤患者出现脓肿的比例高于下肢脊髓损伤患者(5.8% vs. 2.2%, p <0.001)。SCI是PU的最强预测因子(OR = 13.77, CI = 13.25-14.31, p <0.001)。上脊髓损伤的风险高于下脊髓损伤(OR = 2.81, CI = 2.45-3.22, p <0.001)。与之前的报道相反,较高的脊髓损伤水平与较低的脊髓损伤相比,PU的风险增加了三倍。
Pressure Ulcer in Trauma Patients: A Higher Spinal Cord Injury Level Leads to Higher Risk
Background
In a systematic review, the level of spinal cord injury (SCI) was not associated with risk for pressure ulcer (PU). We hypothesized that in the acute trauma population, upper-SCI (cervical/thoracic) has greater risk for PU when compared to lower-SCI (lumbar/sacral). We additionally sought to identify risk factors for development of PUs in trauma.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of the NTDB (2007–2015) was performed. Covariates were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine risk for PU.
Results
Of 62,929 patients (0.9%) with SCI, most had an upper-SCI (83%). The overall rate of PUs in patients with SCI was 5.1%. More patients with upper-SCI developed PUs compared to lower-SCI (5.8% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001). SCI was the strongest predictor for PU (OR = 13.77, CI = 13.25–14.31, p < 0.001). Upper-SCI demonstrated greater risk compared to lower-SCI (OR = 2.81, CI = 2.45–3.22, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Contrary to previous reports, a higher SCI level is associated with a three-fold greater risk for PU compared to lower SCI.