一种应用于胶质母细胞瘤的布朗动力学肿瘤进展模拟器。

Convergent science physical oncology Pub Date : 2018-03-01 Epub Date: 2018-01-03 DOI:10.1088/2057-1739/aa9e6e
Rebecca L Klank, Steven S Rosenfeld, David J Odde
{"title":"一种应用于胶质母细胞瘤的布朗动力学肿瘤进展模拟器。","authors":"Rebecca L Klank,&nbsp;Steven S Rosenfeld,&nbsp;David J Odde","doi":"10.1088/2057-1739/aa9e6e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumor progression modeling offers the potential to predict tumor-spreading behavior to improve prognostic accuracy and guide therapy development. Common simulation methods include continuous reaction-diffusion (RD) approaches that capture mean spatio-temporal tumor spreading behavior and discrete agent-based (AB) approaches which capture individual cell events such as proliferation or migration. The brain cancer glioblastoma (GBM) is especially appropriate for such proliferation-migration modeling approaches because tumor cells seldom metastasize outside of the central nervous system and cells are both highly proliferative and migratory. In glioblastoma research, current RD estimates of proliferation and migration parameters are derived from computed tomography or magnetic resonance images. However, these estimates of glioblastoma cell migration rates, modeled as a diffusion coefficient, are approximately 1-2 orders of magnitude larger than single-cell measurements in animal models of this disease. To identify possible sources for this discrepancy, we evaluated the fundamental RD simulation assumptions that cells are point-like structures that can overlap. To give cells physical size (~10 <i>μ</i>m), we used a Brownian dynamics approach that simulates individual single-cell diffusive migration, growth, and proliferation activity via a gridless, off-lattice, AB method where cells can be prohibited from overlapping each other. We found that for realistic single-cell parameter growth and migration rates, a non-overlapping model gives rise to a jammed configuration in the center of the tumor and a biased outward diffusion of cells in the tumor periphery, creating a quasi-ballistic advancing tumor front. The simulations demonstrate that a fast-progressing tumor can result from minimally diffusive cells, but at a rate that is still dependent on single-cell diffusive migration rates. Thus, modeling with the assumption of physically-grounded volume conservation can account for the apparent discrepancy between estimated and measured diffusion of GBM cells and provide a new theoretical framework that naturally links single-cell growth and migration dynamics to tumor-level progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":91466,"journal":{"name":"Convergent science physical oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1088/2057-1739/aa9e6e","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Brownian dynamics tumor progression simulator with application to glioblastoma.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L Klank,&nbsp;Steven S Rosenfeld,&nbsp;David J Odde\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1739/aa9e6e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tumor progression modeling offers the potential to predict tumor-spreading behavior to improve prognostic accuracy and guide therapy development. Common simulation methods include continuous reaction-diffusion (RD) approaches that capture mean spatio-temporal tumor spreading behavior and discrete agent-based (AB) approaches which capture individual cell events such as proliferation or migration. The brain cancer glioblastoma (GBM) is especially appropriate for such proliferation-migration modeling approaches because tumor cells seldom metastasize outside of the central nervous system and cells are both highly proliferative and migratory. In glioblastoma research, current RD estimates of proliferation and migration parameters are derived from computed tomography or magnetic resonance images. However, these estimates of glioblastoma cell migration rates, modeled as a diffusion coefficient, are approximately 1-2 orders of magnitude larger than single-cell measurements in animal models of this disease. To identify possible sources for this discrepancy, we evaluated the fundamental RD simulation assumptions that cells are point-like structures that can overlap. To give cells physical size (~10 <i>μ</i>m), we used a Brownian dynamics approach that simulates individual single-cell diffusive migration, growth, and proliferation activity via a gridless, off-lattice, AB method where cells can be prohibited from overlapping each other. We found that for realistic single-cell parameter growth and migration rates, a non-overlapping model gives rise to a jammed configuration in the center of the tumor and a biased outward diffusion of cells in the tumor periphery, creating a quasi-ballistic advancing tumor front. The simulations demonstrate that a fast-progressing tumor can result from minimally diffusive cells, but at a rate that is still dependent on single-cell diffusive migration rates. Thus, modeling with the assumption of physically-grounded volume conservation can account for the apparent discrepancy between estimated and measured diffusion of GBM cells and provide a new theoretical framework that naturally links single-cell growth and migration dynamics to tumor-level progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Convergent science physical oncology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1088/2057-1739/aa9e6e\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Convergent science physical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1739/aa9e6e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergent science physical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1739/aa9e6e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

肿瘤进展模型提供了预测肿瘤扩散行为的潜力,以提高预后准确性并指导治疗发展。常见的模拟方法包括捕获平均时空肿瘤扩散行为的连续反应扩散(RD)方法和捕获单个细胞事件(如增殖或迁移)的基于离散试剂的(AB)方法。脑癌症胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)特别适用于这种增殖迁移建模方法,因为肿瘤细胞很少转移到中枢神经系统之外,并且细胞具有高度增殖和迁移性。在胶质母细胞瘤研究中,目前对增殖和迁移参数的RD估计来自计算机断层扫描或磁共振图像。然而,这些以扩散系数建模的胶质母细胞瘤细胞迁移率的估计值比该疾病动物模型中的单细胞测量值大大约1-2个数量级。为了确定这种差异的可能来源,我们评估了基本的RD模拟假设,即细胞是可以重叠的点状结构。为了给出细胞的物理尺寸(~10μm),我们使用了布朗动力学方法,该方法通过无网格、脱离晶格的AB方法模拟单个单细胞的扩散迁移、生长和增殖活动,其中可以禁止细胞相互重叠。我们发现,对于真实的单细胞参数生长和迁移率,非重叠模型会在肿瘤中心产生堵塞配置,并在肿瘤外围产生细胞的偏置向外扩散,从而产生准弹道推进肿瘤前沿。模拟表明,快速进展的肿瘤可能是由最小扩散细胞引起的,但其速度仍取决于单细胞扩散迁移率。因此,基于物理接地体积守恒假设的建模可以解释GBM细胞的估计扩散和测量扩散之间的明显差异,并提供一个新的理论框架,将单细胞生长和迁移动力学与肿瘤水平的进展自然联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Brownian dynamics tumor progression simulator with application to glioblastoma.

Tumor progression modeling offers the potential to predict tumor-spreading behavior to improve prognostic accuracy and guide therapy development. Common simulation methods include continuous reaction-diffusion (RD) approaches that capture mean spatio-temporal tumor spreading behavior and discrete agent-based (AB) approaches which capture individual cell events such as proliferation or migration. The brain cancer glioblastoma (GBM) is especially appropriate for such proliferation-migration modeling approaches because tumor cells seldom metastasize outside of the central nervous system and cells are both highly proliferative and migratory. In glioblastoma research, current RD estimates of proliferation and migration parameters are derived from computed tomography or magnetic resonance images. However, these estimates of glioblastoma cell migration rates, modeled as a diffusion coefficient, are approximately 1-2 orders of magnitude larger than single-cell measurements in animal models of this disease. To identify possible sources for this discrepancy, we evaluated the fundamental RD simulation assumptions that cells are point-like structures that can overlap. To give cells physical size (~10 μm), we used a Brownian dynamics approach that simulates individual single-cell diffusive migration, growth, and proliferation activity via a gridless, off-lattice, AB method where cells can be prohibited from overlapping each other. We found that for realistic single-cell parameter growth and migration rates, a non-overlapping model gives rise to a jammed configuration in the center of the tumor and a biased outward diffusion of cells in the tumor periphery, creating a quasi-ballistic advancing tumor front. The simulations demonstrate that a fast-progressing tumor can result from minimally diffusive cells, but at a rate that is still dependent on single-cell diffusive migration rates. Thus, modeling with the assumption of physically-grounded volume conservation can account for the apparent discrepancy between estimated and measured diffusion of GBM cells and provide a new theoretical framework that naturally links single-cell growth and migration dynamics to tumor-level progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time for a change: considering the rights of study participants to ownership of their personal research-grade genomic data Meeting report: The physics of life—merging clinical, biological and physical sciences approaches for cancer research Changing cell mechanics—a precondition for malignant transformation of oral squamous carcinoma cells Heterogeneous radiotherapy dose-outcomes response in parotid glands Secondary use of electronic medical records for clinical research: Challenges and Opportunities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1