作为胰腺切除术术后强化恢复途径的一部分,术中增加使用血管加压素不会增加胰瘘风险。

Journal of Pancreatic Cancer Pub Date : 2018-06-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pancan.2018.0007
Shachar Laks, Robert S Isaak, Paula D Strassle, Lyla Hance, Lavinia M Kolarczyk, Hong Jin Kim
{"title":"作为胰腺切除术术后强化恢复途径的一部分,术中增加使用血管加压素不会增加胰瘘风险。","authors":"Shachar Laks, Robert S Isaak, Paula D Strassle, Lyla Hance, Lavinia M Kolarczyk, Hong Jin Kim","doi":"10.1089/pancan.2018.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are increasingly implemented. Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a core component of ERAS pathways that limit excessive volume administration and is associated with increased use of intraoperative vasopressors. Vasopressor effects on anastomotic healing and pancreatic fistula are inconclusive. We hypothesized that intraoperative vasopressor use in an ERAS GDFT algorithm would not increase risk of pancreatic fistulas. <b>Methods:</b> We reviewed all adult patients undergoing pancreatectomy at an academic institution from January 2013 to February 2016, before and after implementation of an ERAS pathway in July 2014. Retrospective chart review was performed. Log-binomial regression, weighted by stabilized inverse probability-of-treatment weights, estimated effect of ERAS and intraoperative vasopressors on fistula risk. <b>Results:</b> One hundred thirty two patients met inclusion criteria: 74 (56.1%) in the ERAS cohort. No significant differences in overall leak risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-2.09) were observed between the ERAS and pre-ERAS cohorts. Similarly, vasopressor infusions, independent of ERAS pathway, did not significantly increase the risk of anastomotic leaks (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.52-2.72). <b>Conclusions:</b> Increased use of vasopressor infusions as part of an ERAS pathway for pancreatic surgery is not associated with an increase in the risk of clinically significant pancreatic fistulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pancreatic Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased Intraoperative Vasopressor Use as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Pancreatectomy Does Not Increase Risk of Pancreatic Fistula.\",\"authors\":\"Shachar Laks, Robert S Isaak, Paula D Strassle, Lyla Hance, Lavinia M Kolarczyk, Hong Jin Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pancan.2018.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are increasingly implemented. Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a core component of ERAS pathways that limit excessive volume administration and is associated with increased use of intraoperative vasopressors. Vasopressor effects on anastomotic healing and pancreatic fistula are inconclusive. We hypothesized that intraoperative vasopressor use in an ERAS GDFT algorithm would not increase risk of pancreatic fistulas. <b>Methods:</b> We reviewed all adult patients undergoing pancreatectomy at an academic institution from January 2013 to February 2016, before and after implementation of an ERAS pathway in July 2014. Retrospective chart review was performed. Log-binomial regression, weighted by stabilized inverse probability-of-treatment weights, estimated effect of ERAS and intraoperative vasopressors on fistula risk. <b>Results:</b> One hundred thirty two patients met inclusion criteria: 74 (56.1%) in the ERAS cohort. No significant differences in overall leak risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-2.09) were observed between the ERAS and pre-ERAS cohorts. Similarly, vasopressor infusions, independent of ERAS pathway, did not significantly increase the risk of anastomotic leaks (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.52-2.72). <b>Conclusions:</b> Increased use of vasopressor infusions as part of an ERAS pathway for pancreatic surgery is not associated with an increase in the risk of clinically significant pancreatic fistulas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pancreatic Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pancreatic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pancan.2018.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pancreatic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pancan.2018.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:术后加强恢复(ERAS)路径的实施越来越多。目标引导液体疗法(GDFT)是ERAS路径的核心组成部分,它限制了过多的输液量,并与术中血管加压药的使用增加有关。血管加压剂对吻合口愈合和胰瘘的影响尚无定论。我们假设在 ERAS GDFT 算法中术中使用血管加压药不会增加胰瘘风险。方法:我们回顾了2013年1月至2016年2月期间在一家学术机构接受胰腺切除术的所有成人患者,以及2014年7月实施ERAS路径前后的情况。我们进行了回顾性病历审查。通过稳定的逆治疗概率权重进行对数二项式回归,估计ERAS和术中血管加压对瘘管风险的影响。结果:132 名患者符合纳入标准:ERAS队列中有74人(56.1%)。ERAS和ERAS前队列之间的总体漏血风险无明显差异(风险比[RR]0.89,95%置信区间[CI]0.38-2.09)。同样,与ERAS途径无关,输注血管加压素也不会显著增加吻合口漏的风险(RR 1.19,95% CI 0.52-2.72)。结论作为ERAS路径的一部分,胰腺手术中更多地使用血管加压药输注与临床上显著的胰腺瘘风险增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increased Intraoperative Vasopressor Use as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Pancreatectomy Does Not Increase Risk of Pancreatic Fistula.

Purpose: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are increasingly implemented. Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a core component of ERAS pathways that limit excessive volume administration and is associated with increased use of intraoperative vasopressors. Vasopressor effects on anastomotic healing and pancreatic fistula are inconclusive. We hypothesized that intraoperative vasopressor use in an ERAS GDFT algorithm would not increase risk of pancreatic fistulas. Methods: We reviewed all adult patients undergoing pancreatectomy at an academic institution from January 2013 to February 2016, before and after implementation of an ERAS pathway in July 2014. Retrospective chart review was performed. Log-binomial regression, weighted by stabilized inverse probability-of-treatment weights, estimated effect of ERAS and intraoperative vasopressors on fistula risk. Results: One hundred thirty two patients met inclusion criteria: 74 (56.1%) in the ERAS cohort. No significant differences in overall leak risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-2.09) were observed between the ERAS and pre-ERAS cohorts. Similarly, vasopressor infusions, independent of ERAS pathway, did not significantly increase the risk of anastomotic leaks (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.52-2.72). Conclusions: Increased use of vasopressor infusions as part of an ERAS pathway for pancreatic surgery is not associated with an increase in the risk of clinically significant pancreatic fistulas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integration of Specialized Palliative Care with Oncological Treatment in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Outcomes for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. "Infiltrative" Versus "Mass-Forming" Pancreatic Cancer: A New Radiological Classification System for Pancreatic Head Ductal Carcinoma and Its Pathological Correlation. Biliary Leakage Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: Experience from a High-Volume Center. Isolated Ovarian Metastasis from Pancreatic Cancer Mimicking Primary Ovarian Neoplasia: Role of Molecular Analysis in Determining Diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1