[由于2013年日本疫苗接种计划修订,卡介苗接种年龄发生了变化]。

Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis] Pub Date : 2016-07-01
Kemal Sasaki
{"title":"[由于2013年日本疫苗接种计划修订,卡介苗接种年龄发生了变化]。","authors":"Kemal Sasaki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Japan; infants ranging from 3 to 4 months of age were excluded from the stan- dard vaccination period for Bacillus Calmette-Gu6rin in 2013. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contri- bution of immunization methods and the means of communication employed by municipalities to inform the parents of infants about this revision on the shift in the immunization age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 35 municipalities, I assessed the monthly proportion of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age relative to all infants in 2013, in reference to the immunization method (group or individual immunization) and the application of two-way communication (TWC) between the municipalities and parents, The types of communication that were defined as TWC were as follows: home guidance and face-to-face explanation at the health examination for the infants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In most municipalities, the proportion of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age relative to all infants gradually decreased after following revision of the vaccination period. No signi- ficant differences were observed in these proportions between the municipalities with group immunization and those with individual immunization; however, the variability of these proportions among the municipal- ities with group immunization increased with duration. In the municipalities with individual immunization schedules, the application of TWC to parents promoted the decrease of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age, as compared to that seen in the other municipalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The municipalities with group immunization were characterized by variation in the shift of the immunization age. TWC with parents accelerated this shift in the municipalities with individual immunization.</p>","PeriodicalId":17997,"journal":{"name":"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]","volume":"91 7","pages":"561-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[SHIFT IN THE BCG VACCINATION AGE REGARDING THE 2013 REVISION OF THE JAPANESE VACCINATION SCHEDULE].\",\"authors\":\"Kemal Sasaki\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Japan; infants ranging from 3 to 4 months of age were excluded from the stan- dard vaccination period for Bacillus Calmette-Gu6rin in 2013. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contri- bution of immunization methods and the means of communication employed by municipalities to inform the parents of infants about this revision on the shift in the immunization age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 35 municipalities, I assessed the monthly proportion of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age relative to all infants in 2013, in reference to the immunization method (group or individual immunization) and the application of two-way communication (TWC) between the municipalities and parents, The types of communication that were defined as TWC were as follows: home guidance and face-to-face explanation at the health examination for the infants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In most municipalities, the proportion of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age relative to all infants gradually decreased after following revision of the vaccination period. No signi- ficant differences were observed in these proportions between the municipalities with group immunization and those with individual immunization; however, the variability of these proportions among the municipal- ities with group immunization increased with duration. In the municipalities with individual immunization schedules, the application of TWC to parents promoted the decrease of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age, as compared to that seen in the other municipalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The municipalities with group immunization were characterized by variation in the shift of the immunization age. TWC with parents accelerated this shift in the municipalities with individual immunization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]\",\"volume\":\"91 7\",\"pages\":\"561-567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在日本;2013年,3至4个月大的婴儿被排除在卡介苗-谷氨酸芽孢杆菌的标准接种期之外。本研究的目的是评估免疫方法的贡献和市政当局所采用的沟通手段,告知婴儿父母关于免疫年龄变化的修订。方法:参照免疫接种方式(群体或个体免疫)和市级与家长双向沟通(TWC)的应用,对35个地市2013年3 ~ 4月龄婴儿接种疫苗的比例进行评估,双向沟通方式定义为:家庭指导和健康检查时对婴儿进行面对面解释。结果:在大多数城市,3至4个月大的婴儿接种疫苗的比例相对于所有婴儿在修订疫苗接种期后逐渐下降。在进行群体免疫和单独免疫的城市之间,这些比例没有显著差异;然而,这些比例在有群体免疫的城市之间的差异随着持续时间的增加而增加。在实行个人免疫计划的城市,与其他城市相比,对父母实行TWC导致了3至4个月大的婴儿接种疫苗的减少。结论:开展群体免疫的各市具有免疫年龄变化的特点。与父母一起进行的TWC通过个人免疫加速了市政当局的这一转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[SHIFT IN THE BCG VACCINATION AGE REGARDING THE 2013 REVISION OF THE JAPANESE VACCINATION SCHEDULE].

Objectives: In Japan; infants ranging from 3 to 4 months of age were excluded from the stan- dard vaccination period for Bacillus Calmette-Gu6rin in 2013. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contri- bution of immunization methods and the means of communication employed by municipalities to inform the parents of infants about this revision on the shift in the immunization age.

Methods: In 35 municipalities, I assessed the monthly proportion of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age relative to all infants in 2013, in reference to the immunization method (group or individual immunization) and the application of two-way communication (TWC) between the municipalities and parents, The types of communication that were defined as TWC were as follows: home guidance and face-to-face explanation at the health examination for the infants.

Results: In most municipalities, the proportion of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age relative to all infants gradually decreased after following revision of the vaccination period. No signi- ficant differences were observed in these proportions between the municipalities with group immunization and those with individual immunization; however, the variability of these proportions among the municipal- ities with group immunization increased with duration. In the municipalities with individual immunization schedules, the application of TWC to parents promoted the decrease of infants vaccinated between 3 and 4 months of age, as compared to that seen in the other municipalities.

Conclusions: The municipalities with group immunization were characterized by variation in the shift of the immunization age. TWC with parents accelerated this shift in the municipalities with individual immunization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Surgical treatment of tuberculosis]. [Pulmonary fibrosis]. [CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF 115 PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS PATIENTS WITH SPUTUM SMEAR-NEGATIVE]. [ESTIMATION OF POSITIVE RATES OF INTERFERON-GAMMA RELEASE ASSAY BY AGE GROUP IN JAPAN]. [COMPARISON OF TUBERCULOSIS SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS IN JAPAN AND LOW-INCIDENCE COUNTRIES: INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1