不同妇女群体的婴儿喂养实践:健康开端研究。

IF 1.7 Q2 PEDIATRICS Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics Pub Date : 2019-01-20 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179556518824362
Jill Landsbaugh Kaar, Katherine A Sauder, Allison Lb Shapiro, Anne P Starling, Brandy M Ringham, Susan L Johnson, Dana Dabelea
{"title":"不同妇女群体的婴儿喂养实践:健康开端研究。","authors":"Jill Landsbaugh Kaar,&nbsp;Katherine A Sauder,&nbsp;Allison Lb Shapiro,&nbsp;Anne P Starling,&nbsp;Brandy M Ringham,&nbsp;Susan L Johnson,&nbsp;Dana Dabelea","doi":"10.1177/1179556518824362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe infant feeding practices among a diverse group of mother-offspring pairs and identify factors associated with adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from 835 mother-offspring dyads in The Healthy Start Study, an ongoing longitudinal prebirth cohort in Denver, Colorado. Maternal report of infant feeding practices was obtained at 4 to 6 months and 18 to 24 months postnatally. Practices were classified according to the following AAP recommendations: exclusive breastfeeding for first 6 months, continued breastfeeding through 12 months, and introduction of solid foods around 6 months of age. Participants who met all 3 recommendations were categorized as \"adherent.\" All others were categorized as \"not adherent.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 77% of dyads did not adhere fully to the AAP recommendations. Women who worked ⩾35 hours/week or had a higher prepregnancy body mass index were more likely to be nonadherent. Women who were older, college educated, or had offspring with greater weight for gestational age at birth were less likely to be nonadherent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the women in a large contemporary cohort are not adhering to AAP infant feeding recommendations. Our results highlight the specific subgroups of women who may need additional support to optimize infant feeding practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":45027,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179556518824362","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infant Feeding Practices In a Diverse Group of Women: The Healthy Start Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jill Landsbaugh Kaar,&nbsp;Katherine A Sauder,&nbsp;Allison Lb Shapiro,&nbsp;Anne P Starling,&nbsp;Brandy M Ringham,&nbsp;Susan L Johnson,&nbsp;Dana Dabelea\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179556518824362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe infant feeding practices among a diverse group of mother-offspring pairs and identify factors associated with adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from 835 mother-offspring dyads in The Healthy Start Study, an ongoing longitudinal prebirth cohort in Denver, Colorado. Maternal report of infant feeding practices was obtained at 4 to 6 months and 18 to 24 months postnatally. Practices were classified according to the following AAP recommendations: exclusive breastfeeding for first 6 months, continued breastfeeding through 12 months, and introduction of solid foods around 6 months of age. Participants who met all 3 recommendations were categorized as \\\"adherent.\\\" All others were categorized as \\\"not adherent.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 77% of dyads did not adhere fully to the AAP recommendations. Women who worked ⩾35 hours/week or had a higher prepregnancy body mass index were more likely to be nonadherent. Women who were older, college educated, or had offspring with greater weight for gestational age at birth were less likely to be nonadherent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the women in a large contemporary cohort are not adhering to AAP infant feeding recommendations. Our results highlight the specific subgroups of women who may need additional support to optimize infant feeding practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179556518824362\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179556518824362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179556518824362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:描述一组不同的母子对的婴儿喂养实践,并确定与遵守美国儿科学会(AAP)建议相关的因素。方法:在科罗拉多州丹佛市的一项正在进行的纵向产前队列健康开始研究中,对835对母子进行数据分析。在出生后4至6个月和18至24个月获得婴儿喂养实践的母亲报告。根据美国儿科学会(AAP)的以下建议进行了分类:前6个月纯母乳喂养,持续母乳喂养至12个月,并在6个月左右引入固体食物。满足所有3条建议的参与者被归类为“坚持”。其他所有人都被归类为“不坚持”。结果:约77%的二人组没有完全遵守美国儿科学会的建议。每周工作35小时或怀孕前体重指数较高的女性更有可能不坚持。年龄较大、受过大学教育或子女出生时体重大于胎龄的妇女不坚持服药的可能性较小。结论:在一个大型当代队列中,大多数妇女没有遵守美国儿科学会婴儿喂养建议。我们的研究结果强调了可能需要额外支持以优化婴儿喂养实践的特定妇女亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infant Feeding Practices In a Diverse Group of Women: The Healthy Start Study.

Background: To describe infant feeding practices among a diverse group of mother-offspring pairs and identify factors associated with adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations.

Methods: Data were analyzed from 835 mother-offspring dyads in The Healthy Start Study, an ongoing longitudinal prebirth cohort in Denver, Colorado. Maternal report of infant feeding practices was obtained at 4 to 6 months and 18 to 24 months postnatally. Practices were classified according to the following AAP recommendations: exclusive breastfeeding for first 6 months, continued breastfeeding through 12 months, and introduction of solid foods around 6 months of age. Participants who met all 3 recommendations were categorized as "adherent." All others were categorized as "not adherent."

Results: About 77% of dyads did not adhere fully to the AAP recommendations. Women who worked ⩾35 hours/week or had a higher prepregnancy body mass index were more likely to be nonadherent. Women who were older, college educated, or had offspring with greater weight for gestational age at birth were less likely to be nonadherent.

Conclusions: Most of the women in a large contemporary cohort are not adhering to AAP infant feeding recommendations. Our results highlight the specific subgroups of women who may need additional support to optimize infant feeding practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Giant Congenital Ovarian Cyst Presenting as an Abdominal Mass. Influencing Factors on Independent Walking in Children With Lumbosacral Lipomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on a 5-Year Untethering Series. Neonatal Sepsis: Aetiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Advances and Management Strategies. Assessment of Voiding Dysfunction and Nocturnal Enuresis Rates in Primary School Children in Nablus, Palestine: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Multi-Center Retrospective Database Evaluation of Pediatric Subjects Diagnosed With Methemoglobinemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1