通过药敏型分析确定临床酵母菌分离株的平行和交叉耐药。

GMS infectious diseases Pub Date : 2016-06-07 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.3205/id000020
Arno F Schmalreck, Birgit Willinger, Evgeny A Idelevich, Christian Fegeler, Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Wolfgang Fegeler, Karsten Becker
{"title":"通过药敏型分析确定临床酵母菌分离株的平行和交叉耐药。","authors":"Arno F Schmalreck,&nbsp;Birgit Willinger,&nbsp;Evgeny A Idelevich,&nbsp;Christian Fegeler,&nbsp;Cornelia Lass-Flörl,&nbsp;Wolfgang Fegeler,&nbsp;Karsten Becker","doi":"10.3205/id000020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For calculated initial antifungal therapy, knowledge on parallel and cross-resistances are vitally important particularly in the case of multiresistant isolates. Based on a strain collection of 1,062 yeast isolates from a German/Austrian multicentre study, susceptibility pattern analysis (SPA) was used to determine the proportion of parallel and cross-resistances to eight antifungal agents (AFAs) encompassing flucytosine, amphotericin B, azoles (fluconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole) and echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin). A total of 414 (39.0%) isolates were resistant for one or more of the AFAs. Resistance to one AFA was shown for 18.1% of all isolates. For 222 isolates (20.9%), resistance to two to seven AFAs was noted (7.7%; 7.7%; 3.6%; 1.0%; 0.7% and 0.2% to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 antifungal compounds, respectively). Partial parallel resistances within the azole and echinocandin classes, respectively, were found for 81 (7.6%) and 70 (6.6%) isolates. Complete parallel resistances for azoles, echinocandins and combined for both classes were exhibited by 93 (8.8%), 18 (1.7%) and 6 (0.6%) isolates, respectively. Isolates displaying cross-resistances between azoles and echinocandins were infrequently found. Highly resistant isolates (resistance to ≥6 AFAs) were almost exclusively represented by <i>Candida albicans</i>. Highly standardized testing of AFAs in parallel and from the same inocula followed by SPA allows detailed insights in the prevalence and distribution of susceptibility patterns of microbial isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":91688,"journal":{"name":"GMS infectious diseases","volume":"4 ","pages":"Doc02"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301743/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parallel and cross-resistances of clinical yeast isolates determined by susceptibility pattern analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arno F Schmalreck,&nbsp;Birgit Willinger,&nbsp;Evgeny A Idelevich,&nbsp;Christian Fegeler,&nbsp;Cornelia Lass-Flörl,&nbsp;Wolfgang Fegeler,&nbsp;Karsten Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/id000020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For calculated initial antifungal therapy, knowledge on parallel and cross-resistances are vitally important particularly in the case of multiresistant isolates. Based on a strain collection of 1,062 yeast isolates from a German/Austrian multicentre study, susceptibility pattern analysis (SPA) was used to determine the proportion of parallel and cross-resistances to eight antifungal agents (AFAs) encompassing flucytosine, amphotericin B, azoles (fluconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole) and echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin). A total of 414 (39.0%) isolates were resistant for one or more of the AFAs. Resistance to one AFA was shown for 18.1% of all isolates. For 222 isolates (20.9%), resistance to two to seven AFAs was noted (7.7%; 7.7%; 3.6%; 1.0%; 0.7% and 0.2% to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 antifungal compounds, respectively). Partial parallel resistances within the azole and echinocandin classes, respectively, were found for 81 (7.6%) and 70 (6.6%) isolates. Complete parallel resistances for azoles, echinocandins and combined for both classes were exhibited by 93 (8.8%), 18 (1.7%) and 6 (0.6%) isolates, respectively. Isolates displaying cross-resistances between azoles and echinocandins were infrequently found. Highly resistant isolates (resistance to ≥6 AFAs) were almost exclusively represented by <i>Candida albicans</i>. Highly standardized testing of AFAs in parallel and from the same inocula followed by SPA allows detailed insights in the prevalence and distribution of susceptibility patterns of microbial isolates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Doc02\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/id000020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/id000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对于计算初始抗真菌治疗,平行和交叉耐药的知识是至关重要的,特别是在多重耐药菌株的情况下。基于来自德国/奥地利多中心研究的1062株酵母菌分离株,采用敏感性模式分析(SPA)确定了8种抗真菌药物(AFAs)的平行和交叉耐药比例,包括氟胞嘧啶、两性霉素B、唑类药物(氟康唑、伏立康唑和泊沙康唑)和棘白菌素(卡波芬津、米卡芬津和阿尼杜拉芬津)。共有414株(39.0%)菌株对一种或多种AFAs耐药。18.1%的分离株对一种AFA耐药。222株(20.9%)对2 ~ 7种AFAs耐药(7.7%);7.7%;3.6%;1.0%;0.7%和0.2%分别为2、3、4、5、6和7种抗真菌化合物)。分别有81株(7.6%)和70株(6.6%)在唑类和棘白菌素类中发现部分平行耐药。分别有93株(8.8%)、18株(1.7%)和6株(0.6%)对唑类、棘白菌素和两类药物均有完全平行耐药。偶氮类与棘白菌素交叉耐药的分离株很少发现。高耐药菌株(对≥6种AFAs的耐药)几乎完全由白色念珠菌代表。高度标准化的AFAs平行测试和同一接种后的SPA测试可以详细了解微生物分离物的流行和药敏模式分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parallel and cross-resistances of clinical yeast isolates determined by susceptibility pattern analysis.

For calculated initial antifungal therapy, knowledge on parallel and cross-resistances are vitally important particularly in the case of multiresistant isolates. Based on a strain collection of 1,062 yeast isolates from a German/Austrian multicentre study, susceptibility pattern analysis (SPA) was used to determine the proportion of parallel and cross-resistances to eight antifungal agents (AFAs) encompassing flucytosine, amphotericin B, azoles (fluconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole) and echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin). A total of 414 (39.0%) isolates were resistant for one or more of the AFAs. Resistance to one AFA was shown for 18.1% of all isolates. For 222 isolates (20.9%), resistance to two to seven AFAs was noted (7.7%; 7.7%; 3.6%; 1.0%; 0.7% and 0.2% to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 antifungal compounds, respectively). Partial parallel resistances within the azole and echinocandin classes, respectively, were found for 81 (7.6%) and 70 (6.6%) isolates. Complete parallel resistances for azoles, echinocandins and combined for both classes were exhibited by 93 (8.8%), 18 (1.7%) and 6 (0.6%) isolates, respectively. Isolates displaying cross-resistances between azoles and echinocandins were infrequently found. Highly resistant isolates (resistance to ≥6 AFAs) were almost exclusively represented by Candida albicans. Highly standardized testing of AFAs in parallel and from the same inocula followed by SPA allows detailed insights in the prevalence and distribution of susceptibility patterns of microbial isolates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trichosporon infection in chronic kidney disease patients from a tertiary care hospital - a case series or an outbreak? An unanswered question but a well-managed problem. Fusarium spp.: infections and intoxications. A complex case of bacterial pericarditis caused by a new pathogenic agent. The interpretation of COVID-19 in cause-of-death statistics: a matter of causality. Therapeutic strategies for uncomplicated cystitis in women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1