母性伙伴关系工作:绘制英格兰MSLCs。

Q4 Nursing Practising Midwife Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Mary Newburn, Abigail Easter, Gillian Fletcher, Rachel Plachcinski
{"title":"母性伙伴关系工作:绘制英格兰MSLCs。","authors":"Mary Newburn,&nbsp;Abigail Easter,&nbsp;Gillian Fletcher,&nbsp;Rachel Plachcinski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maternity services liaison committees (MSLCs) have a long history but were affected by 2013 health reforms. An online survey of heads of midwifery (HoMs) and service users was conducted to assess how many NHS trusts in England had a functioning MSLC and whether they were supported by clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and working with Healthwatch, the new statutory consumer advocate. Results showed that at least 62 per cent of trusts had an MSLC. However, support from commissioners varied widely. Around two fifths of MSLCs had administrative support provided by the CCG or their local NHS trust. One in eight MSLCs had a budget including an allowance for the Chair. Some MSLCs were struggling to continue, due to little or no support. Both HoMs and service users wanted commissioners to provide more consistent support for MSLCs. One in five MSLCs had a clear link with Healthwatch. This is a legacy to underpin the transition to CCG-funded MaternityVoices Partnerships in 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":35678,"journal":{"name":"Practising Midwife","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternity partnership working - mapping MSLCs in England.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Newburn,&nbsp;Abigail Easter,&nbsp;Gillian Fletcher,&nbsp;Rachel Plachcinski\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Maternity services liaison committees (MSLCs) have a long history but were affected by 2013 health reforms. An online survey of heads of midwifery (HoMs) and service users was conducted to assess how many NHS trusts in England had a functioning MSLC and whether they were supported by clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and working with Healthwatch, the new statutory consumer advocate. Results showed that at least 62 per cent of trusts had an MSLC. However, support from commissioners varied widely. Around two fifths of MSLCs had administrative support provided by the CCG or their local NHS trust. One in eight MSLCs had a budget including an allowance for the Chair. Some MSLCs were struggling to continue, due to little or no support. Both HoMs and service users wanted commissioners to provide more consistent support for MSLCs. One in five MSLCs had a clear link with Healthwatch. This is a legacy to underpin the transition to CCG-funded MaternityVoices Partnerships in 2017.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practising Midwife\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practising Midwife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practising Midwife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产妇服务联络委员会(MSLCs)历史悠久,但受到2013年卫生改革的影响。一项针对助产士(HoMs)和服务用户的在线调查进行了评估,以评估英格兰有多少NHS信托机构拥有有效的MSLC,以及它们是否得到了临床委托小组(ccg)的支持,并与Healthwatch(新的法定消费者权益倡导者)合作。结果显示,至少62%的信托拥有MSLC。然而,委员们的支持分歧很大。大约五分之二的MSLCs由CCG或其当地NHS信托机构提供行政支持。八分之一的中低收入国家的预算包括主席津贴。由于很少或根本没有支持,一些mslc正在努力继续下去。HoMs和服务用户都希望委员们为mslc提供更加一致的支持。五分之一的MSLCs与Healthwatch有明确的联系。这是2017年向ccg资助的孕产妇之声伙伴关系过渡的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maternity partnership working - mapping MSLCs in England.

Maternity services liaison committees (MSLCs) have a long history but were affected by 2013 health reforms. An online survey of heads of midwifery (HoMs) and service users was conducted to assess how many NHS trusts in England had a functioning MSLC and whether they were supported by clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and working with Healthwatch, the new statutory consumer advocate. Results showed that at least 62 per cent of trusts had an MSLC. However, support from commissioners varied widely. Around two fifths of MSLCs had administrative support provided by the CCG or their local NHS trust. One in eight MSLCs had a budget including an allowance for the Chair. Some MSLCs were struggling to continue, due to little or no support. Both HoMs and service users wanted commissioners to provide more consistent support for MSLCs. One in five MSLCs had a clear link with Healthwatch. This is a legacy to underpin the transition to CCG-funded MaternityVoices Partnerships in 2017.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practising Midwife
Practising Midwife Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevention: A Commentary. Weight loss interventions for improving fertility: a synthesis of current evidence. Evaluating the association of female obesity with the risk of live birth following IVF: Implications for clinical practice. Screening for Low Papp-A: Inconsistencies and Incongruities An Ethnographic Study of the Philosophy, Culture and Practices Within an Urban Freestanding Midwifery Unit: Part 2 – Staff Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1