非典型纤维黄瘤和多形性真皮肉瘤的全基因组甲基化分析和拷贝数分析表明具有相似的分子表型。

Clinical Sarcoma Research Pub Date : 2019-02-14 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13569-019-0113-6
Christian Koelsche, Damian Stichel, Klaus G Griewank, Daniel Schrimpf, David E Reuss, Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler, Christian Vokuhl, Winand N M Dinjens, Iver Petersen, Michel Mittelbronn, Adrian Cuevas-Bourdier, Rolf Buslei, Stefan M Pfister, Uta Flucke, Gunhild Mechtersheimer, Thomas Mentzel, Andreas von Deimling
{"title":"非典型纤维黄瘤和多形性真皮肉瘤的全基因组甲基化分析和拷贝数分析表明具有相似的分子表型。","authors":"Christian Koelsche,&nbsp;Damian Stichel,&nbsp;Klaus G Griewank,&nbsp;Daniel Schrimpf,&nbsp;David E Reuss,&nbsp;Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler,&nbsp;Christian Vokuhl,&nbsp;Winand N M Dinjens,&nbsp;Iver Petersen,&nbsp;Michel Mittelbronn,&nbsp;Adrian Cuevas-Bourdier,&nbsp;Rolf Buslei,&nbsp;Stefan M Pfister,&nbsp;Uta Flucke,&nbsp;Gunhild Mechtersheimer,&nbsp;Thomas Mentzel,&nbsp;Andreas von Deimling","doi":"10.1186/s13569-019-0113-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atypical fibroxanthomas (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas (PDS) are lesions of the skin with overlapping histologic features and unspecific molecular traits. PDS behaves aggressive compared to AFX. Thus, a precise delineation, although challenging in some instances, is relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the value of DNA-methylation profiling and copy number analysis for separating these tumors. DNA-methylation data were generated from 17 AFX and 15 PDS using the Illumina EPIC array. These were compared with DNA-methylation data generated from 196 tumors encompassing potential histologic mimics like cutaneous squamous carcinomas (cSCC; n = 19), basal cell carcinomas (n = 10), melanoma metastases originating from the skin (n = 11), leiomyosarcomas (n = 11), angiosarcomas of the skin and soft tissue (n = 11), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (n = 19), dermatofibrosarcomas protuberans (n = 13), extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas (n = 9), myxoid liposarcomas (n = 14), schwannomas (n = 10), neurofibromas (n = 21), alveolar (n = 19) and embryonal (n = 17) rhabdomyosarcomas as well as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (n = 12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DNA-methylation profiling did not separate AFX from PDS. The DNA-methylation profiles of the other cases, however, were distinct from AFX/PDS. They reliably assigned to subtype-specific DNA-methylation clusters, although overlap occurred between some AFX/PDS and cSCC. Copy number profiling revealed alterations in a similar frequency and distribution between AFX and PDS. They involved losses of 9p (22/32) and 13q (25/32). Gains frequently involved 8q (8/32). Notably, a homozygous deletion of <i>CDKN2A</i> was more frequent in PDS (6/15) than in AFX (2/17), whereas amplifications were non-recurrent and overall rare (5/32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the concept that AFX and PDS belong to a common tumor spectrum. We could demonstrate the diagnostic value of DNA-methylation profiling to delineating AFX/PDS from potential mimics. However, the assessment of certain histologic features remains crucial for separating PDS from AFX.</p>","PeriodicalId":10684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-019-0113-6","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genome-wide methylation profiling and copy number analysis in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas indicate a similar molecular phenotype.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Koelsche,&nbsp;Damian Stichel,&nbsp;Klaus G Griewank,&nbsp;Daniel Schrimpf,&nbsp;David E Reuss,&nbsp;Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler,&nbsp;Christian Vokuhl,&nbsp;Winand N M Dinjens,&nbsp;Iver Petersen,&nbsp;Michel Mittelbronn,&nbsp;Adrian Cuevas-Bourdier,&nbsp;Rolf Buslei,&nbsp;Stefan M Pfister,&nbsp;Uta Flucke,&nbsp;Gunhild Mechtersheimer,&nbsp;Thomas Mentzel,&nbsp;Andreas von Deimling\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13569-019-0113-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atypical fibroxanthomas (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas (PDS) are lesions of the skin with overlapping histologic features and unspecific molecular traits. PDS behaves aggressive compared to AFX. Thus, a precise delineation, although challenging in some instances, is relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the value of DNA-methylation profiling and copy number analysis for separating these tumors. DNA-methylation data were generated from 17 AFX and 15 PDS using the Illumina EPIC array. These were compared with DNA-methylation data generated from 196 tumors encompassing potential histologic mimics like cutaneous squamous carcinomas (cSCC; n = 19), basal cell carcinomas (n = 10), melanoma metastases originating from the skin (n = 11), leiomyosarcomas (n = 11), angiosarcomas of the skin and soft tissue (n = 11), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (n = 19), dermatofibrosarcomas protuberans (n = 13), extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas (n = 9), myxoid liposarcomas (n = 14), schwannomas (n = 10), neurofibromas (n = 21), alveolar (n = 19) and embryonal (n = 17) rhabdomyosarcomas as well as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (n = 12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DNA-methylation profiling did not separate AFX from PDS. The DNA-methylation profiles of the other cases, however, were distinct from AFX/PDS. They reliably assigned to subtype-specific DNA-methylation clusters, although overlap occurred between some AFX/PDS and cSCC. Copy number profiling revealed alterations in a similar frequency and distribution between AFX and PDS. They involved losses of 9p (22/32) and 13q (25/32). Gains frequently involved 8q (8/32). Notably, a homozygous deletion of <i>CDKN2A</i> was more frequent in PDS (6/15) than in AFX (2/17), whereas amplifications were non-recurrent and overall rare (5/32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the concept that AFX and PDS belong to a common tumor spectrum. We could demonstrate the diagnostic value of DNA-methylation profiling to delineating AFX/PDS from potential mimics. However, the assessment of certain histologic features remains crucial for separating PDS from AFX.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-019-0113-6\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-019-0113-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-019-0113-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

背景:非典型纤维黄瘤(AFX)和多形性真皮肉瘤(PDS)是具有重叠组织学特征和非特异性分子特征的皮肤病变。与AFX相比,PDS表现出侵略性。因此,尽管在某些情况下具有挑战性,但精确的描述是相关的。方法:我们检验dna甲基化分析和拷贝数分析对分离这些肿瘤的价值。使用Illumina EPIC阵列从17个AFX和15个PDS中生成dna甲基化数据。这些数据与来自196个肿瘤的dna甲基化数据进行了比较,这些肿瘤包括潜在的组织模拟物,如皮肤鳞状癌(cSCC;19例)、基底细胞癌(10例)、皮肤黑色素瘤转移瘤(11例)、平滑肌肉瘤(11例)、皮肤和软组织血管肉瘤(11例)、周围神经鞘恶性肿瘤(19例)、皮肤纤维隆突肉瘤(13例)、骨骼外黏液样软骨肉瘤(9例)、黏液样脂肪肉瘤(14例)、神经鞘瘤(10例)、神经纤维瘤(21例)、肺泡型(19例)和胚胎型(17例)横纹肌肉瘤以及未分化多形性肉瘤(12例)。结果:dna甲基化分析不能分离AFX和PDS。然而,其他病例的dna甲基化谱与AFX/PDS不同。尽管在一些AFX/PDS和cSCC之间存在重叠,但它们可靠地归属于亚型特异性dna甲基化簇。拷贝数分析揭示了AFX和PDS之间相似频率和分布的改变。他们分别损失了9便士(22/32)和13便士(25/32)。收益通常涉及8q(8/32)。值得注意的是,CDKN2A的纯合缺失在PDS(6/15)中比在AFX(2/17)中更常见,而扩增则不复发且总体罕见(5/32)。结论:我们的研究结果支持AFX和PDS属于共同肿瘤谱的概念。我们可以证明dna甲基化谱在从潜在的模拟物中描绘AFX/PDS方面的诊断价值。然而,某些组织学特征的评估仍然是区分PDS和AFX的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genome-wide methylation profiling and copy number analysis in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas indicate a similar molecular phenotype.

Background: Atypical fibroxanthomas (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas (PDS) are lesions of the skin with overlapping histologic features and unspecific molecular traits. PDS behaves aggressive compared to AFX. Thus, a precise delineation, although challenging in some instances, is relevant.

Methods: We examined the value of DNA-methylation profiling and copy number analysis for separating these tumors. DNA-methylation data were generated from 17 AFX and 15 PDS using the Illumina EPIC array. These were compared with DNA-methylation data generated from 196 tumors encompassing potential histologic mimics like cutaneous squamous carcinomas (cSCC; n = 19), basal cell carcinomas (n = 10), melanoma metastases originating from the skin (n = 11), leiomyosarcomas (n = 11), angiosarcomas of the skin and soft tissue (n = 11), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (n = 19), dermatofibrosarcomas protuberans (n = 13), extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas (n = 9), myxoid liposarcomas (n = 14), schwannomas (n = 10), neurofibromas (n = 21), alveolar (n = 19) and embryonal (n = 17) rhabdomyosarcomas as well as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (n = 12).

Results: DNA-methylation profiling did not separate AFX from PDS. The DNA-methylation profiles of the other cases, however, were distinct from AFX/PDS. They reliably assigned to subtype-specific DNA-methylation clusters, although overlap occurred between some AFX/PDS and cSCC. Copy number profiling revealed alterations in a similar frequency and distribution between AFX and PDS. They involved losses of 9p (22/32) and 13q (25/32). Gains frequently involved 8q (8/32). Notably, a homozygous deletion of CDKN2A was more frequent in PDS (6/15) than in AFX (2/17), whereas amplifications were non-recurrent and overall rare (5/32).

Conclusions: Our findings support the concept that AFX and PDS belong to a common tumor spectrum. We could demonstrate the diagnostic value of DNA-methylation profiling to delineating AFX/PDS from potential mimics. However, the assessment of certain histologic features remains crucial for separating PDS from AFX.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Sarcoma Research considers for publication articles related to research on sarcomas, including both soft tissue and bone. The journal publishes original articles and review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas along with new insights in sarcoma research, which may be of immediate or future interest for diagnosis and treatment. The journal also considers negative results, especially those from studies on new agents, as it is vital for the medical community to learn whether new agents have been proven effective or ineffective within subtypes of sarcomas. The journal also aims to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest for the sarcoma community, which may be related to both research results and methodological topics.
期刊最新文献
Partial response to erlotinib in a patient with imatinib-refractory sacral chordoma. Locally recurrent extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the shoulder: a case of complete neoadjuvant radiotherapy response. The role of prognostic nutritional index in the management of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy: the EEG with frontal intermittent delta activity, and rapid resolution with methylene blue: A case report. Simultaneous diagnosis of liver PEComa in a family with known Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1