戒烟从业人员对电子烟的使用和功效的理解,特别是对吸烟者社会经济地位的理解。

IF 1.2 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2018.9
Rosemary Hiscock, Deborah Arnott, Martin Dockrell, Louise Ross, Andy McEwen
{"title":"戒烟从业人员对电子烟的使用和功效的理解,特别是对吸烟者社会经济地位的理解。","authors":"Rosemary Hiscock, Deborah Arnott, Martin Dockrell, Louise Ross, Andy McEwen","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2018.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> We have undertaken four online surveys of Stop Smoking Service (SSS) practitioners in England, between 2011 and 2016, in order to enhance our understanding of e-cigarettes: a fast moving new phenomenon. It is important to understand whether e-cigarettes can ameliorate or exacerbate health inequalities given that smoking is one of the most serious causes of excessive mortality and morbidity among disadvantaged groups globally. <b>Aims:</b> To update findings of previous surveys and examine socioeconomic status differences in e-cigarette use and efficacy. <b>Methods:</b> Analysis was undertaken of electronic surveys, particularly, the most recent 2016 survey (<i>n</i> = 514) and 2015/16 SSS client routine monitoring data. <b>Results:</b> SSS practitioners were becoming more positive about e-cigarettes: 42% agreed that e-cigarettes were a good thing compared with 15% in 2011. Reported use of e-cigarettes among SSS clients was low (about 3%) despite higher quit rates (63% of clients reported being quit at four week follow-up, compared with 51% overall). Where socioeconomic differences in e-cigarettes' efficacy for quitting were identified, affluent and working smokers were advantaged. <b>Conclusions:</b> Low use of e-cigarettes by clients and practitioner opinions suggest that further education of SSS staff is needed if they are to adopt the current service recommendations about e-cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"14 1","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stop Smoking Practitioners' understanding of e-cigarettes' use and efficacy with particular reference to vapers' socioeconomic status.\",\"authors\":\"Rosemary Hiscock, Deborah Arnott, Martin Dockrell, Louise Ross, Andy McEwen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jsc.2018.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> We have undertaken four online surveys of Stop Smoking Service (SSS) practitioners in England, between 2011 and 2016, in order to enhance our understanding of e-cigarettes: a fast moving new phenomenon. It is important to understand whether e-cigarettes can ameliorate or exacerbate health inequalities given that smoking is one of the most serious causes of excessive mortality and morbidity among disadvantaged groups globally. <b>Aims:</b> To update findings of previous surveys and examine socioeconomic status differences in e-cigarette use and efficacy. <b>Methods:</b> Analysis was undertaken of electronic surveys, particularly, the most recent 2016 survey (<i>n</i> = 514) and 2015/16 SSS client routine monitoring data. <b>Results:</b> SSS practitioners were becoming more positive about e-cigarettes: 42% agreed that e-cigarettes were a good thing compared with 15% in 2011. Reported use of e-cigarettes among SSS clients was low (about 3%) despite higher quit rates (63% of clients reported being quit at four week follow-up, compared with 51% overall). Where socioeconomic differences in e-cigarettes' efficacy for quitting were identified, affluent and working smokers were advantaged. <b>Conclusions:</b> Low use of e-cigarettes by clients and practitioner opinions suggest that further education of SSS staff is needed if they are to adopt the current service recommendations about e-cigarettes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"21-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2018.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2018.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:我们在 2011 年至 2016 年期间对英格兰的戒烟服务(SSS)从业人员进行了四次在线调查,以加深我们对电子烟这一快速发展的新现象的了解。鉴于吸烟是导致全球弱势群体死亡率和发病率过高的最严重原因之一,了解电子烟是否能改善或加剧健康不平等现象非常重要。目的:更新以往的调查结果,研究电子烟使用和功效方面的社会经济地位差异。方法:分析电子调查,特别是最近的 2016 年调查(n = 514)和 2015/16 年 SSS 客户常规监测数据。结果:SSS 从业人员对电子烟的态度越来越积极:42%的人认为电子烟是一件好事,而2011年这一比例为15%。尽管戒烟率较高(63%的客户在四周随访时报告已戒烟,而总体戒烟率为51%),但SS客户报告的电子烟使用率较低(约为3%)。在电子烟戒烟效果的社会经济差异方面,富裕和有工作的吸烟者更有优势。结论客户对电子烟的使用率较低以及从业人员的意见表明,如果要采纳目前关于电子烟的服务建议,就需要对自闭症服务机构的工作人员进行进一步的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stop Smoking Practitioners' understanding of e-cigarettes' use and efficacy with particular reference to vapers' socioeconomic status.

Introduction: We have undertaken four online surveys of Stop Smoking Service (SSS) practitioners in England, between 2011 and 2016, in order to enhance our understanding of e-cigarettes: a fast moving new phenomenon. It is important to understand whether e-cigarettes can ameliorate or exacerbate health inequalities given that smoking is one of the most serious causes of excessive mortality and morbidity among disadvantaged groups globally. Aims: To update findings of previous surveys and examine socioeconomic status differences in e-cigarette use and efficacy. Methods: Analysis was undertaken of electronic surveys, particularly, the most recent 2016 survey (n = 514) and 2015/16 SSS client routine monitoring data. Results: SSS practitioners were becoming more positive about e-cigarettes: 42% agreed that e-cigarettes were a good thing compared with 15% in 2011. Reported use of e-cigarettes among SSS clients was low (about 3%) despite higher quit rates (63% of clients reported being quit at four week follow-up, compared with 51% overall). Where socioeconomic differences in e-cigarettes' efficacy for quitting were identified, affluent and working smokers were advantaged. Conclusions: Low use of e-cigarettes by clients and practitioner opinions suggest that further education of SSS staff is needed if they are to adopt the current service recommendations about e-cigarettes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. Integrating the "Quit and Stay Quit Monday" Model into Smoking Cessation Services for Smokers with Mental Health Conditions: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1