NCAA一级越野赛和径赛学生运动员饮食失调风险的性别差异。

Pub Date : 2019-02-03 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/5035871
Paul A Krebs, Christopher R Dennison, Lisa Kellar, Jeff Lucas
{"title":"NCAA一级越野赛和径赛学生运动员饮食失调风险的性别差异。","authors":"Paul A Krebs,&nbsp;Christopher R Dennison,&nbsp;Lisa Kellar,&nbsp;Jeff Lucas","doi":"10.1155/2019/5035871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared gender differences in eating disorder risk among NCAA Division I cross country and track distance running student-athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six hundred thirty-eight male and female student-athletes competing at distances of 800m or greater completed the Eating Disorder Screen for Primary Care (ESP). Scores on the ESP were used as the risk of eating disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females screened positive at higher rates for risk of eating disorders than males on the ESP at a cutoff of 2 (sensitivity 90-100%, specificity 71%) with rates of 45.95% ± 3.03 and 13.66% ± 1.80, respectively. Females were also screened positive at higher rates than males at a stricter cutoff of 3 (sensitivity 81%, specificity 92%), with rates of 21.69% ± 2.50 compared to 4.64% ± 1.10, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights that, among distance runners, both males and females are at risk of eating disorders, with females being at higher risk. It also emphasizes the need for screening for risk of eating disorders in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":73953,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"2019 ","pages":"5035871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/5035871","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Eating Disorder Risk among NCAA Division I Cross Country and Track Student-Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Paul A Krebs,&nbsp;Christopher R Dennison,&nbsp;Lisa Kellar,&nbsp;Jeff Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2019/5035871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared gender differences in eating disorder risk among NCAA Division I cross country and track distance running student-athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six hundred thirty-eight male and female student-athletes competing at distances of 800m or greater completed the Eating Disorder Screen for Primary Care (ESP). Scores on the ESP were used as the risk of eating disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females screened positive at higher rates for risk of eating disorders than males on the ESP at a cutoff of 2 (sensitivity 90-100%, specificity 71%) with rates of 45.95% ± 3.03 and 13.66% ± 1.80, respectively. Females were also screened positive at higher rates than males at a stricter cutoff of 3 (sensitivity 81%, specificity 92%), with rates of 21.69% ± 2.50 compared to 4.64% ± 1.10, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights that, among distance runners, both males and females are at risk of eating disorders, with females being at higher risk. It also emphasizes the need for screening for risk of eating disorders in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"2019 \",\"pages\":\"5035871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/5035871\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5035871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5035871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

目的:本研究比较NCAA一级越野跑和田径长跑学生运动员饮食失调风险的性别差异。方法:638名参加800米及以上比赛的男女学生运动员完成了初级保健进食障碍筛查(ESP)。ESP得分被用作饮食失调的风险。结果:女性进食障碍筛查阳性率高于男性(敏感性90-100%,特异性71%),临界值为2,分别为45.95%±3.03和13.66%±1.80。女性的阳性检出率也高于男性,更严格的截止值为3(敏感性81%,特异性92%),女性的检出率分别为21.69%±2.50和4.64%±1.10。结论:这项研究强调,在长跑运动员中,男性和女性都有饮食失调的风险,女性的风险更高。它还强调了对这一人群进行饮食失调风险筛查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Differences in Eating Disorder Risk among NCAA Division I Cross Country and Track Student-Athletes.

Purpose: This study compared gender differences in eating disorder risk among NCAA Division I cross country and track distance running student-athletes.

Methods: Six hundred thirty-eight male and female student-athletes competing at distances of 800m or greater completed the Eating Disorder Screen for Primary Care (ESP). Scores on the ESP were used as the risk of eating disorders.

Results: Females screened positive at higher rates for risk of eating disorders than males on the ESP at a cutoff of 2 (sensitivity 90-100%, specificity 71%) with rates of 45.95% ± 3.03 and 13.66% ± 1.80, respectively. Females were also screened positive at higher rates than males at a stricter cutoff of 3 (sensitivity 81%, specificity 92%), with rates of 21.69% ± 2.50 compared to 4.64% ± 1.10, respectively.

Conclusion: This study highlights that, among distance runners, both males and females are at risk of eating disorders, with females being at higher risk. It also emphasizes the need for screening for risk of eating disorders in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1