Jonathan Wilcock, Katherine Devitt, Juli-Anne Gardner
{"title":"短暂性骨髓异常:21三体的线索。","authors":"Jonathan Wilcock, Katherine Devitt, Juli-Anne Gardner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cutoff values are calculated using various mathematical methods to determine whether abnormalities seen are at reportable (statistically significant) levels. However, for interphase FISH studies of samples obtained from oncology patients who have been transplanted or treated, these cutoff values may result in reporting a false negative result due to the small percentage of residual disease that falls below such a cutoff value. Failure to detect the rare abnormal cells may impact patient care and prognosis. For such situations, the two questions are: is the disease still present, and if so, how prevalent is it? The first question is qualitative and the second is quantitative. Traditionally, only the quantitative parameters have been used for determining reportability. Here we propose a method to account for both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of interphase FISH results.</p>","PeriodicalId":73975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists","volume":"45 2","pages":"77-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transient Abnormal Myelopoiesis: A Clue to Trisomy 21.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Wilcock, Katherine Devitt, Juli-Anne Gardner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cutoff values are calculated using various mathematical methods to determine whether abnormalities seen are at reportable (statistically significant) levels. However, for interphase FISH studies of samples obtained from oncology patients who have been transplanted or treated, these cutoff values may result in reporting a false negative result due to the small percentage of residual disease that falls below such a cutoff value. Failure to detect the rare abnormal cells may impact patient care and prognosis. For such situations, the two questions are: is the disease still present, and if so, how prevalent is it? The first question is qualitative and the second is quantitative. Traditionally, only the quantitative parameters have been used for determining reportability. Here we propose a method to account for both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of interphase FISH results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"77-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transient Abnormal Myelopoiesis: A Clue to Trisomy 21.
Objectives: Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cutoff values are calculated using various mathematical methods to determine whether abnormalities seen are at reportable (statistically significant) levels. However, for interphase FISH studies of samples obtained from oncology patients who have been transplanted or treated, these cutoff values may result in reporting a false negative result due to the small percentage of residual disease that falls below such a cutoff value. Failure to detect the rare abnormal cells may impact patient care and prognosis. For such situations, the two questions are: is the disease still present, and if so, how prevalent is it? The first question is qualitative and the second is quantitative. Traditionally, only the quantitative parameters have been used for determining reportability. Here we propose a method to account for both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of interphase FISH results.