创伤性脑损伤动物模型的性别差异。

Journal of Experimental Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-05-13 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179069519844020
Todd G Rubin, Michael L Lipton
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤动物模型的性别差异。","authors":"Todd G Rubin,&nbsp;Michael L Lipton","doi":"10.1177/1179069519844020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is highly prevalent and there is currently no adequate treatment. Understanding the underlying mechanisms governing TBI and recovery remains an elusive goal. The heterogeneous nature of injury and individual's response to injury have made understanding risk and susceptibility to TBI of great importance. Epidemiologic studies have provided evidence of sex-dependent differences following TBI. However, preclinical models of injury have largely focused on adult male animals. Here, we review 50 studies that have investigated TBI in both sexes using animal models. Results from these studies are highly variable and model dependent, but largely show females to have a protective advantage in behavioral outcomes and pathology following TBI. Further research of both sexes using newer models that better recapitulate mild and repetitive TBI is needed to characterize the nature of sex-dependent injury and recovery, and ultimately identifies targets for enhanced recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Neuroscience","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179069519844020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179069519844020","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Differences in Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Todd G Rubin,&nbsp;Michael L Lipton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179069519844020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is highly prevalent and there is currently no adequate treatment. Understanding the underlying mechanisms governing TBI and recovery remains an elusive goal. The heterogeneous nature of injury and individual's response to injury have made understanding risk and susceptibility to TBI of great importance. Epidemiologic studies have provided evidence of sex-dependent differences following TBI. However, preclinical models of injury have largely focused on adult male animals. Here, we review 50 studies that have investigated TBI in both sexes using animal models. Results from these studies are highly variable and model dependent, but largely show females to have a protective advantage in behavioral outcomes and pathology following TBI. Further research of both sexes using newer models that better recapitulate mild and repetitive TBI is needed to characterize the nature of sex-dependent injury and recovery, and ultimately identifies targets for enhanced recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1179069519844020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179069519844020\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179069519844020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179069519844020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)非常普遍,目前没有足够的治疗方法。了解控制TBI和恢复的潜在机制仍然是一个难以捉摸的目标。损伤的异质性和个体对损伤的反应使得了解TBI的风险和易感性变得非常重要。流行病学研究提供了创伤性脑损伤后性别依赖性差异的证据。然而,临床前损伤模型主要集中在成年雄性动物身上。在这里,我们回顾了50项使用动物模型研究男女脑外伤的研究。这些研究的结果是高度可变和模型依赖的,但在很大程度上表明,女性在创伤性脑损伤后的行为结果和病理方面具有保护优势。需要对两性进行进一步的研究,使用更新的模型来更好地概括轻度和重复性脑损伤,以表征性别依赖性损伤和恢复的性质,并最终确定增强恢复的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex Differences in Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is highly prevalent and there is currently no adequate treatment. Understanding the underlying mechanisms governing TBI and recovery remains an elusive goal. The heterogeneous nature of injury and individual's response to injury have made understanding risk and susceptibility to TBI of great importance. Epidemiologic studies have provided evidence of sex-dependent differences following TBI. However, preclinical models of injury have largely focused on adult male animals. Here, we review 50 studies that have investigated TBI in both sexes using animal models. Results from these studies are highly variable and model dependent, but largely show females to have a protective advantage in behavioral outcomes and pathology following TBI. Further research of both sexes using newer models that better recapitulate mild and repetitive TBI is needed to characterize the nature of sex-dependent injury and recovery, and ultimately identifies targets for enhanced recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Commentary on TDP-43 and DNA Damage Response in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Concepts and Research Considerations. Future Directions in Examining Neurological Adaptation to Bilingual Experiences Walking Function After Cervical Contusion and Distraction Spinal Cord Injuries in Rats. Discovering Conserved Properties of Brain Organization Through Multimodal Integration and Interspecies Comparison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1