马来西亚物理治疗师对循证实践的知识、态度和障碍

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.002
Hannah C. Yahui BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy, Narasimman Swaminathan MPTh
{"title":"马来西亚物理治疗师对循证实践的知识、态度和障碍","authors":"Hannah C. Yahui BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy,&nbsp;Narasimman Swaminathan MPTh","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recently, there has been an increased need for all healthcare disciplines to provide interventions that are effective and evidence based. This has led to more implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical settings. Following this, research regarding EBP gained attention to determine its uptake into the physiotherapy profession. Although there are numerous studies to determine the attitudes and barriers of physiotherapists towards EBP, most of them were done in developed nations. As for Malaysia, little research has been carried out, much less among physiotherapists.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to identify the knowledge, attitude, and barriers towards the implementation of EBP among physiotherapists in Malaysia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A survey was conducted among the members of the Malaysian Physiotherapy Association and other practicing therapists in Malaysia. One hundred and two responses were collected throughout a span of 2 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respondents agreed that EBP is necessary to practice and that it helps in decision making as well as improving patient care. Eighty-one percent of the respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that they had received formal training in EBP. However, 61% of the respondents reported that strong evidence is lacking to support their interventions. Thirty percent of the respondents reported reading &lt;2 articles per month, with 57% stating that they read two to five articles in a typical month. This study also found time constraints, limited access to search engines, and lack of generalizability of research evidence as the top three barriers to implementing EBP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Physiotherapists in Malaysia had a positive attitude towards EBP and are inclined towards implementing evidence into their clinical practice. They are interested in attending courses to improve their knowledge and skills in EBP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"37 ","pages":"Pages 10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.002","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers towards evidence-based practice among physiotherapists in Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Hannah C. Yahui BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy,&nbsp;Narasimman Swaminathan MPTh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recently, there has been an increased need for all healthcare disciplines to provide interventions that are effective and evidence based. This has led to more implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical settings. Following this, research regarding EBP gained attention to determine its uptake into the physiotherapy profession. Although there are numerous studies to determine the attitudes and barriers of physiotherapists towards EBP, most of them were done in developed nations. As for Malaysia, little research has been carried out, much less among physiotherapists.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to identify the knowledge, attitude, and barriers towards the implementation of EBP among physiotherapists in Malaysia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A survey was conducted among the members of the Malaysian Physiotherapy Association and other practicing therapists in Malaysia. One hundred and two responses were collected throughout a span of 2 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respondents agreed that EBP is necessary to practice and that it helps in decision making as well as improving patient care. Eighty-one percent of the respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that they had received formal training in EBP. However, 61% of the respondents reported that strong evidence is lacking to support their interventions. Thirty percent of the respondents reported reading &lt;2 articles per month, with 57% stating that they read two to five articles in a typical month. This study also found time constraints, limited access to search engines, and lack of generalizability of research evidence as the top three barriers to implementing EBP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Physiotherapists in Malaysia had a positive attitude towards EBP and are inclined towards implementing evidence into their clinical practice. They are interested in attending courses to improve their knowledge and skills in EBP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 10-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702516300525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702516300525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

最近,所有卫生保健学科都越来越需要提供有效的、基于证据的干预措施。这导致在临床环境中更多地实施循证实践(EBP)。在此之后,关于EBP的研究获得了关注,以确定其在物理治疗专业中的吸收。虽然有许多研究确定物理治疗师对EBP的态度和障碍,但大多数研究都是在发达国家进行的。至于马来西亚,很少进行相关研究,更不用说在物理治疗师中进行研究了。目的本研究的目的是确定马来西亚物理治疗师在实施EBP方面的知识、态度和障碍。方法对马来西亚物理治疗协会会员和马来西亚其他执业治疗师进行调查。在2个月的时间里收集了102份回复。结果受访者一致认为EBP在实践中是必要的,它有助于决策和改善患者护理。81%的受访者同意或非常同意他们接受过EBP的正式培训。然而,61%的答复者报告说,缺乏强有力的证据来支持他们的干预措施。30%的受访者表示他们每月阅读2篇文章,57%的人表示他们通常一个月阅读2到5篇文章。本研究还发现,时间限制、搜索引擎访问受限、研究证据缺乏普遍性是实施EBP的三大障碍。结论马来西亚的物理治疗师对EBP持积极态度,并倾向于将证据运用到临床实践中。他们有兴趣参加课程,以提高他们在EBP方面的知识和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers towards evidence-based practice among physiotherapists in Malaysia

Background

Recently, there has been an increased need for all healthcare disciplines to provide interventions that are effective and evidence based. This has led to more implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical settings. Following this, research regarding EBP gained attention to determine its uptake into the physiotherapy profession. Although there are numerous studies to determine the attitudes and barriers of physiotherapists towards EBP, most of them were done in developed nations. As for Malaysia, little research has been carried out, much less among physiotherapists.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the knowledge, attitude, and barriers towards the implementation of EBP among physiotherapists in Malaysia.

Methods

A survey was conducted among the members of the Malaysian Physiotherapy Association and other practicing therapists in Malaysia. One hundred and two responses were collected throughout a span of 2 months.

Results

Respondents agreed that EBP is necessary to practice and that it helps in decision making as well as improving patient care. Eighty-one percent of the respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that they had received formal training in EBP. However, 61% of the respondents reported that strong evidence is lacking to support their interventions. Thirty percent of the respondents reported reading <2 articles per month, with 57% stating that they read two to five articles in a typical month. This study also found time constraints, limited access to search engines, and lack of generalizability of research evidence as the top three barriers to implementing EBP.

Conclusion

Physiotherapists in Malaysia had a positive attitude towards EBP and are inclined towards implementing evidence into their clinical practice. They are interested in attending courses to improve their knowledge and skills in EBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Level of self-efficacy among skill-based allied health students in the University of Santo Tomas-Enriched Virtual Mode of learning: A cross-sectional study. Physical therapy exercises for improving intermittent exotropia control post-strabismus surgery: A randomized controlled study Reliability and validity of modified upper limb neurodynamic tests in patients with cervical radiculopathy The test-induced warm-up effect on hamstring flexibility tests Effect of Kinesio taping versus mechanical cervical traction combined with physiotherapy program on chronic neck pain in young female university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1