膝关节骨性关节炎患者Tinetti运动能力评估量表的心理测量特性评价

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001
Huma Parveen, Majumi M. Noohu
{"title":"膝关节骨性关节炎患者Tinetti运动能力评估量表的心理测量特性评价","authors":"Huma Parveen,&nbsp;Majumi M. Noohu","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) scale to measure balance and gait impairments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A convenient sample of 25 individuals with bilateral OA knee were recruited. The convergent validity was determined by correlation analysis between scores of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) with balance subscale (POMA-B) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) with gait subscale (POMA-G). The intrarater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1)], the Bland–Altman plots limits of agreement (LOA), the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC) and ceiling/floor effects were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Score of BBS was significantly correlated with POMA-B scores, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.63, <em>p</em> = 0.001, whereas TUGT showed a negative correlation with POMA-G, r<sub>s</sub> = −0.481, <em>p</em> = 0.020, showing moderate convergent validity. ICC results of the total POMA scale (POMA-T), POMA-B, and POMA-G were 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively, indicating high test retest reliability. SEM, for POMA-T, POMA-B, and POMA-G was 0.35, 0.27, and 0.35, respectively; MDC values were 0.97 for POMA-T, 0.75 for POMA-B, and 0.63 for POMA-G.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings indicate that the POMA is a valid and reliable tool to assess balance and gait impairments in people with OA knee.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of psychometric properties of Tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment scale in subjects with knee osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"Huma Parveen,&nbsp;Majumi M. Noohu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) scale to measure balance and gait impairments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A convenient sample of 25 individuals with bilateral OA knee were recruited. The convergent validity was determined by correlation analysis between scores of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) with balance subscale (POMA-B) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) with gait subscale (POMA-G). The intrarater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1)], the Bland–Altman plots limits of agreement (LOA), the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC) and ceiling/floor effects were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Score of BBS was significantly correlated with POMA-B scores, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.63, <em>p</em> = 0.001, whereas TUGT showed a negative correlation with POMA-G, r<sub>s</sub> = −0.481, <em>p</em> = 0.020, showing moderate convergent validity. ICC results of the total POMA scale (POMA-T), POMA-B, and POMA-G were 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively, indicating high test retest reliability. SEM, for POMA-T, POMA-B, and POMA-G was 0.35, 0.27, and 0.35, respectively; MDC values were 0.97 for POMA-T, 0.75 for POMA-B, and 0.63 for POMA-G.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings indicate that the POMA is a valid and reliable tool to assess balance and gait impairments in people with OA knee.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 25-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702516300082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702516300082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

目的本研究的目的是确定Tinetti性能导向活动能力评估(POMA)量表的心理测量特性,以测量膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的平衡和步态障碍。方法选取25例双侧OA膝关节患者作为方便样本。通过Berg平衡量表(BBS)与平衡子量表(POMA-B)和计时起跑测验(TUGT)与步态子量表(POMA-G)的相关分析来确定收敛效度。确定了内部信度[类内相关系数(ICC 3,1)]、Bland-Altman图一致限(LOA)、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和天花板/地板效应。结果BBS评分与POMA-B评分呈显著相关(rs = 0.63, p = 0.001), TUGT与POMA-G评分呈负相关(rs = - 0.481, p = 0.020),具有中等收敛效度。总POMA量表(POMA- t)、POMA- b和POMA- g的ICC结果分别为0.96、0.93和0.96,表明测试重测信度较高。POMA-T、POMA-B和POMA-G的SEM分别为0.35、0.27和0.35;POMA-T的MDC值为0.97,POMA-B为0.75,POMA-G为0.63。结论研究结果表明,POMA是评估OA膝关节患者平衡和步态障碍的有效可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of psychometric properties of Tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment scale in subjects with knee osteoarthritis

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) scale to measure balance and gait impairments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

A convenient sample of 25 individuals with bilateral OA knee were recruited. The convergent validity was determined by correlation analysis between scores of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) with balance subscale (POMA-B) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) with gait subscale (POMA-G). The intrarater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1)], the Bland–Altman plots limits of agreement (LOA), the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC) and ceiling/floor effects were determined.

Results

Score of BBS was significantly correlated with POMA-B scores, rs = 0.63, p = 0.001, whereas TUGT showed a negative correlation with POMA-G, rs = −0.481, p = 0.020, showing moderate convergent validity. ICC results of the total POMA scale (POMA-T), POMA-B, and POMA-G were 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively, indicating high test retest reliability. SEM, for POMA-T, POMA-B, and POMA-G was 0.35, 0.27, and 0.35, respectively; MDC values were 0.97 for POMA-T, 0.75 for POMA-B, and 0.63 for POMA-G.

Conclusion

The findings indicate that the POMA is a valid and reliable tool to assess balance and gait impairments in people with OA knee.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Level of self-efficacy among skill-based allied health students in the University of Santo Tomas-Enriched Virtual Mode of learning: A cross-sectional study. Physical therapy exercises for improving intermittent exotropia control post-strabismus surgery: A randomized controlled study Reliability and validity of modified upper limb neurodynamic tests in patients with cervical radiculopathy The test-induced warm-up effect on hamstring flexibility tests Effect of Kinesio taping versus mechanical cervical traction combined with physiotherapy program on chronic neck pain in young female university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1