Matthew H.M. Chan MPT, Donald T.F. Keung MPT, Steve Y.T. Lui MPT, Roy T.H. Cheung PhD
{"title":"老年人功能活动能力评估智能手机应用程序的验证研究","authors":"Matthew H.M. Chan MPT, Donald T.F. Keung MPT, Steve Y.T. Lui MPT, Roy T.H. Cheung PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To minimize the reaction time and position judgment error using stopwatch-timed measures, we developed a smartphone application to measure performance in the five-time sit-to-stand (FTSTS) and timed up-and-go (TUG) tests.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to validate this smartphone application by comparing its measurement with a laboratory-based reference condition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-two healthy elderly people were asked to perform the FTSTS and TUG tests in a randomized sequence. During the tests, their performance was concurrently measured by the smartphone application and a force sensor installed in the backrest of a chair. The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub>] and Bland–Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between these two methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The smartphone application demonstrated excellent measurement consistency with the lab-based reference condition for the FTSTS test [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub> = 0.988] and TUG test [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub> = 0.946]. We observed a positive bias of 0.27 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.22 to 1.76 seconds) for the FTSTS test and 0.48 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.66 to 2.63 seconds) for the TUG test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We cross-validated the newly developed smartphone application with the laboratory-based reference condition during the examination of FTSTS and TUG test performance in healthy elderly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A validation study of a smartphone application for functional mobility assessment of the elderly\",\"authors\":\"Matthew H.M. Chan MPT, Donald T.F. Keung MPT, Steve Y.T. Lui MPT, Roy T.H. Cheung PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To minimize the reaction time and position judgment error using stopwatch-timed measures, we developed a smartphone application to measure performance in the five-time sit-to-stand (FTSTS) and timed up-and-go (TUG) tests.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to validate this smartphone application by comparing its measurement with a laboratory-based reference condition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-two healthy elderly people were asked to perform the FTSTS and TUG tests in a randomized sequence. During the tests, their performance was concurrently measured by the smartphone application and a force sensor installed in the backrest of a chair. The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub>] and Bland–Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between these two methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The smartphone application demonstrated excellent measurement consistency with the lab-based reference condition for the FTSTS test [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub> = 0.988] and TUG test [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub> = 0.946]. We observed a positive bias of 0.27 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.22 to 1.76 seconds) for the FTSTS test and 0.48 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.66 to 2.63 seconds) for the TUG test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We cross-validated the newly developed smartphone application with the laboratory-based reference condition during the examination of FTSTS and TUG test performance in healthy elderly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702515300051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702515300051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
A validation study of a smartphone application for functional mobility assessment of the elderly
Background
To minimize the reaction time and position judgment error using stopwatch-timed measures, we developed a smartphone application to measure performance in the five-time sit-to-stand (FTSTS) and timed up-and-go (TUG) tests.
Objective
This study aimed to validate this smartphone application by comparing its measurement with a laboratory-based reference condition.
Methods
Thirty-two healthy elderly people were asked to perform the FTSTS and TUG tests in a randomized sequence. During the tests, their performance was concurrently measured by the smartphone application and a force sensor installed in the backrest of a chair. The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] and Bland–Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between these two methods.
Results
The smartphone application demonstrated excellent measurement consistency with the lab-based reference condition for the FTSTS test [ICC(2,1) = 0.988] and TUG test [ICC(2,1) = 0.946]. We observed a positive bias of 0.27 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.22 to 1.76 seconds) for the FTSTS test and 0.48 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.66 to 2.63 seconds) for the TUG test.
Conclusion
We cross-validated the newly developed smartphone application with the laboratory-based reference condition during the examination of FTSTS and TUG test performance in healthy elderly.
期刊介绍:
The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.