肌肉能量技术和静态拉伸对机械性颈痛患者疼痛和功能障碍的影响:一项随机对照试验

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002
Apoorva Phadke MPT , Nilima Bedekar PhD , Ashok Shyam MS (Ortho) , Parag Sancheti MS (Ortho)
{"title":"肌肉能量技术和静态拉伸对机械性颈痛患者疼痛和功能障碍的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Apoorva Phadke MPT ,&nbsp;Nilima Bedekar PhD ,&nbsp;Ashok Shyam MS (Ortho) ,&nbsp;Parag Sancheti MS (Ortho)","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mechanical neck pain is one of the common musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle energy technique (MET) may be a useful intervention for treating such disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effect of MET with passive stretching on pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial was undertaken. Sixty patients with mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to either the MET group or control group. The former group received MET, and the latter group received static stretching. Both groups received conventional therapy. Treatment was given once a day for 6 days. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the intensity of pain, and functional disability was assessed using the neck disability index (NDI) was immediately before treatment and again on the 6<sup>th</sup> day.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>VAS and NDI scores showed a significant improvement in both MET and stretching groups on the 6<sup>th</sup> day postintervention (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). However, both VAS and NDI scores showed better improvement in the MET group as compared to the stretching group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.025).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Muscle energy technique was better than stretching technique in improving pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"Pages 5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Apoorva Phadke MPT ,&nbsp;Nilima Bedekar PhD ,&nbsp;Ashok Shyam MS (Ortho) ,&nbsp;Parag Sancheti MS (Ortho)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mechanical neck pain is one of the common musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle energy technique (MET) may be a useful intervention for treating such disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effect of MET with passive stretching on pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial was undertaken. Sixty patients with mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to either the MET group or control group. The former group received MET, and the latter group received static stretching. Both groups received conventional therapy. Treatment was given once a day for 6 days. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the intensity of pain, and functional disability was assessed using the neck disability index (NDI) was immediately before treatment and again on the 6<sup>th</sup> day.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>VAS and NDI scores showed a significant improvement in both MET and stretching groups on the 6<sup>th</sup> day postintervention (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). However, both VAS and NDI scores showed better improvement in the MET group as compared to the stretching group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.025).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Muscle energy technique was better than stretching technique in improving pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 5-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702515000810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702515000810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

背景:机械性颈痛是常见的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。肌肉能量技术(MET)可能是治疗这种疾病的有效干预手段。目的本研究的目的是比较MET和被动拉伸对机械性颈痛患者疼痛和功能障碍的影响。方法采用随机对照试验。60例机械性颈痛患者随机分为MET组和对照组。前一组接受MET,后一组接受静态拉伸。两组均接受常规治疗。每日1次,连用6天。采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale, VAS)评估疼痛程度,并在治疗前及第6天分别采用颈部残疾指数(neck disability index, NDI)评估功能障碍。结果MET组和拉伸组在干预后第6天的vas和NDI评分均有显著改善(p <0.05)。然而,与拉伸组相比,MET组的VAS和NDI评分均有更好的改善(p <0.025)。结论肌能技术在改善机械性颈痛患者疼痛和功能障碍方面优于拉伸技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Mechanical neck pain is one of the common musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle energy technique (MET) may be a useful intervention for treating such disorder.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of MET with passive stretching on pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was undertaken. Sixty patients with mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to either the MET group or control group. The former group received MET, and the latter group received static stretching. Both groups received conventional therapy. Treatment was given once a day for 6 days. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the intensity of pain, and functional disability was assessed using the neck disability index (NDI) was immediately before treatment and again on the 6th day.

Results

VAS and NDI scores showed a significant improvement in both MET and stretching groups on the 6th day postintervention (p < 0.05). However, both VAS and NDI scores showed better improvement in the MET group as compared to the stretching group (p < 0.025).

Conclusion

Muscle energy technique was better than stretching technique in improving pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Level of self-efficacy among skill-based allied health students in the University of Santo Tomas-Enriched Virtual Mode of learning: A cross-sectional study. Physical therapy exercises for improving intermittent exotropia control post-strabismus surgery: A randomized controlled study Reliability and validity of modified upper limb neurodynamic tests in patients with cervical radiculopathy The test-induced warm-up effect on hamstring flexibility tests Effect of Kinesio taping versus mechanical cervical traction combined with physiotherapy program on chronic neck pain in young female university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1