{"title":"下咽癌患者的全身治疗、姑息和支持性护理。","authors":"Patrick J Bradley, Thorsten Füreder, Hans E Eckel","doi":"10.1159/000492359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypopharyngeal cancer patients have a very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Seventy to eighty per cent of all hypopharyngeal cancer patients will require palliative and/or end-of-life care for incurable end-stage disease during the course of their illness. The overall proportion of hypopharyngeal cancer patients not qualifying for initial curative treatment, or requiring palliation and supportive care over time is higher than for any other subsite of the head and neck. Surgery and radiotherapy usually have a very limited role in this setting, while systemic therapy will usually compete with supportive care as the best approach. Advances in medicine and oncological treatments for the management of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer have given physicians the opportunity to prolong life where possible. However, this increase in survival might not be clinically meaningful if patients do not simultaneously experience palliative benefits, such as a reduction in symptoms and an improvement in their overall quality of life (QoL). The optimal outcome of palliative treatment is the control of symptoms with minimal treatment toxicities while improving QoL. It remains unclear if current palliative treatment options are better at improving QoL than the best supportive care. An intervention that results in insufficient or unacceptable functional status to the extent that the patient cannot achieve treatment goals - even in the course of prolonging life - is questionable. When used for palliative care purposes, surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy commonly have limited effectiveness in improving QoL. Moreover, if these treatments are not congruent with a patient's end-of-life goals, they could constitute low-value care.</p>","PeriodicalId":39848,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":"83 ","pages":"148-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000492359","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic Therapy, Palliation and Supportive Care of Patients with Hypopharyngeal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick J Bradley, Thorsten Füreder, Hans E Eckel\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000492359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hypopharyngeal cancer patients have a very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Seventy to eighty per cent of all hypopharyngeal cancer patients will require palliative and/or end-of-life care for incurable end-stage disease during the course of their illness. The overall proportion of hypopharyngeal cancer patients not qualifying for initial curative treatment, or requiring palliation and supportive care over time is higher than for any other subsite of the head and neck. Surgery and radiotherapy usually have a very limited role in this setting, while systemic therapy will usually compete with supportive care as the best approach. Advances in medicine and oncological treatments for the management of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer have given physicians the opportunity to prolong life where possible. However, this increase in survival might not be clinically meaningful if patients do not simultaneously experience palliative benefits, such as a reduction in symptoms and an improvement in their overall quality of life (QoL). The optimal outcome of palliative treatment is the control of symptoms with minimal treatment toxicities while improving QoL. It remains unclear if current palliative treatment options are better at improving QoL than the best supportive care. An intervention that results in insufficient or unacceptable functional status to the extent that the patient cannot achieve treatment goals - even in the course of prolonging life - is questionable. When used for palliative care purposes, surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy commonly have limited effectiveness in improving QoL. Moreover, if these treatments are not congruent with a patient's end-of-life goals, they could constitute low-value care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"148-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000492359\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000492359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000492359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systemic Therapy, Palliation and Supportive Care of Patients with Hypopharyngeal Cancer.
Hypopharyngeal cancer patients have a very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Seventy to eighty per cent of all hypopharyngeal cancer patients will require palliative and/or end-of-life care for incurable end-stage disease during the course of their illness. The overall proportion of hypopharyngeal cancer patients not qualifying for initial curative treatment, or requiring palliation and supportive care over time is higher than for any other subsite of the head and neck. Surgery and radiotherapy usually have a very limited role in this setting, while systemic therapy will usually compete with supportive care as the best approach. Advances in medicine and oncological treatments for the management of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer have given physicians the opportunity to prolong life where possible. However, this increase in survival might not be clinically meaningful if patients do not simultaneously experience palliative benefits, such as a reduction in symptoms and an improvement in their overall quality of life (QoL). The optimal outcome of palliative treatment is the control of symptoms with minimal treatment toxicities while improving QoL. It remains unclear if current palliative treatment options are better at improving QoL than the best supportive care. An intervention that results in insufficient or unacceptable functional status to the extent that the patient cannot achieve treatment goals - even in the course of prolonging life - is questionable. When used for palliative care purposes, surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy commonly have limited effectiveness in improving QoL. Moreover, if these treatments are not congruent with a patient's end-of-life goals, they could constitute low-value care.
期刊介绍:
Material for each volume in this series has been skillfully selected to document the most active areas of otorhinolaryngology and related specialties, such as neuro-otology and oncology. The series reproduces results from basic research and clinical studies pertaining to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical symptoms, course, prognosis and therapy of a variety of ear, nose and throat disorders. The numerous papers correlating basic research findings and clinical applications are of immense value to all specialists engaged in the ongoing efforts to improve management of these disorders. Acting as a voice for its field, the series has also been instrumental in developing subspecialities into established specialities.