Hossein Aslian, Tomas Kron, Francesco Longo, Roya Rad, Mara Severgnini
{"title":"心脏植入式电子装置的立体定向放射治疗与放射外科治疗综述与分析。","authors":"Hossein Aslian, Tomas Kron, Francesco Longo, Roya Rad, Mara Severgnini","doi":"10.1007/s13246-019-00751-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has greatly increased due to its convenience and advantages from perspectives ranging from radiobiology to radio physics. Because SBRT/SRS delivers high doses in few fractions, precise dose delivery to target volumes and sufficient sparing of adjacent organs at risk (OARs) are required. Achieving these conflicting objectives is challenging for all patients receiving SBRT/SRS and may be particularly challenging when SBRT/SRS is adopted for treating patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) because cumulative doses in CIEDs must be limited. Published research considering the different aspects of stereotactic treatment in patients with CIEDs was reviewed to summarise their findings in the following sections: (I) conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based SBRT and SRS; (II) CyberKnife, Gamma-Knife, VERO and helical tomotherapy SBRT and SRS; and (III) proton therapy. A total of 65 patients who had CIEDs and underwent SRS, SBRT, or SABR treatments were identified in the reviewed studies. The functionality of the CIEDs was assessed for 58 patients. Of those, CIED malfunctions (such as data loss, mode change, and inappropriate shock) were reported in four patients (6.89%). This review highlights the available sparse information in the literature by posing questions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":55430,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":"42 2","pages":"415-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13246-019-00751-8","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review and analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiosurgery of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Aslian, Tomas Kron, Francesco Longo, Roya Rad, Mara Severgnini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-019-00751-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has greatly increased due to its convenience and advantages from perspectives ranging from radiobiology to radio physics. Because SBRT/SRS delivers high doses in few fractions, precise dose delivery to target volumes and sufficient sparing of adjacent organs at risk (OARs) are required. Achieving these conflicting objectives is challenging for all patients receiving SBRT/SRS and may be particularly challenging when SBRT/SRS is adopted for treating patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) because cumulative doses in CIEDs must be limited. Published research considering the different aspects of stereotactic treatment in patients with CIEDs was reviewed to summarise their findings in the following sections: (I) conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based SBRT and SRS; (II) CyberKnife, Gamma-Knife, VERO and helical tomotherapy SBRT and SRS; and (III) proton therapy. A total of 65 patients who had CIEDs and underwent SRS, SBRT, or SABR treatments were identified in the reviewed studies. The functionality of the CIEDs was assessed for 58 patients. Of those, CIED malfunctions (such as data loss, mode change, and inappropriate shock) were reported in four patients (6.89%). This review highlights the available sparse information in the literature by posing questions for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"415-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13246-019-00751-8\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00751-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00751-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review and analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiosurgery of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
The implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has greatly increased due to its convenience and advantages from perspectives ranging from radiobiology to radio physics. Because SBRT/SRS delivers high doses in few fractions, precise dose delivery to target volumes and sufficient sparing of adjacent organs at risk (OARs) are required. Achieving these conflicting objectives is challenging for all patients receiving SBRT/SRS and may be particularly challenging when SBRT/SRS is adopted for treating patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) because cumulative doses in CIEDs must be limited. Published research considering the different aspects of stereotactic treatment in patients with CIEDs was reviewed to summarise their findings in the following sections: (I) conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based SBRT and SRS; (II) CyberKnife, Gamma-Knife, VERO and helical tomotherapy SBRT and SRS; and (III) proton therapy. A total of 65 patients who had CIEDs and underwent SRS, SBRT, or SABR treatments were identified in the reviewed studies. The functionality of the CIEDs was assessed for 58 patients. Of those, CIED malfunctions (such as data loss, mode change, and inappropriate shock) were reported in four patients (6.89%). This review highlights the available sparse information in the literature by posing questions for future research.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (APESM) is a multidisciplinary forum for information and research on the application of physics and engineering to medicine and human physiology. APESM covers a broad range of topics that include but is not limited to:
- Medical physics in radiotherapy
- Medical physics in diagnostic radiology
- Medical physics in nuclear medicine
- Mathematical modelling applied to medicine and human biology
- Clinical biomedical engineering
- Feature extraction, classification of EEG, ECG, EMG, EOG, and other biomedical signals;
- Medical imaging - contributions to new and improved methods;
- Modelling of physiological systems
- Image processing to extract information from images, e.g. fMRI, CT, etc.;
- Biomechanics, especially with applications to orthopaedics.
- Nanotechnology in medicine
APESM offers original reviews, scientific papers, scientific notes, technical papers, educational notes, book reviews and letters to the editor.
APESM is the journal of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, and also the official journal of the College of Biomedical Engineers, Engineers Australia and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics.