关节镜下微骨折与无细胞支架植入治疗距骨软骨病变的比较。

Toygun Kağan Eren, Muhammet Baybars Ataoğlu, Ali Eren, Dilan Ece Geylan, Ali Yusuf Öner, Ulunay Kanatlı
{"title":"关节镜下微骨折与无细胞支架植入治疗距骨软骨病变的比较。","authors":"Toygun Kağan Eren,&nbsp;Muhammet Baybars Ataoğlu,&nbsp;Ali Eren,&nbsp;Dilan Ece Geylan,&nbsp;Ali Yusuf Öner,&nbsp;Ulunay Kanatlı","doi":"10.5606/ehc.2019.64401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare two single-step arthroscopic techniques, microfracture and cell-free scaffold implantation, in the treatment of talar osteochondral lesions (OCLs) clinically and radiologically.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 62 patients (35 males, 27 females; mean age 41±13 years; range, 15 to 65 years) diagnosed with talar OCLs between March 2007 and January 2015. Patients who were followed-up with a minimum of 24 months with lesions larger than 1 cm2 were included. Pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations were performed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and radiological evaluations according to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into microfracture (n=22) and scaffold (n=40) groups. The mean follow-up duration was 36.1±14.9 months. The mean preoperative AOFAS score increased from 60.6±13.9 to 82.1±11.8 in the microfracture group (p<0.001) and from 53.8±13.6 to 89.4±9.9 in the scaffold group (p<0.001). The scaffold group had superior results than the microfracture group clinically (p=0.011). Clinical results were superior in younger patients (<45 years) (p=0.018), male patients (p=0.020), and traumatic lesions (p=0.014). There was no significant difference between the two techniques according to the total MOCART scores (p=0.199). However, the scaffold technique was more successful in terms of lesion border and effusion subgoups of MOCART scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both single-step arthroscopic techniques are effective and safe in the treatment of talar OCLs. The scaffold technique showed superior clinical results than the microfracture technique in short-term follow-up. Age, trauma history and gender significantly affected the treatment outcomes. The scaffold technique can be considered as a safe and good alternative particularly in the treatment of large lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50551,"journal":{"name":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","volume":"30 2","pages":"97-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of arthroscopic microfracture and cell-free scaffold implantation techniques in the treatment of talar osteochondral lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Toygun Kağan Eren,&nbsp;Muhammet Baybars Ataoğlu,&nbsp;Ali Eren,&nbsp;Dilan Ece Geylan,&nbsp;Ali Yusuf Öner,&nbsp;Ulunay Kanatlı\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/ehc.2019.64401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare two single-step arthroscopic techniques, microfracture and cell-free scaffold implantation, in the treatment of talar osteochondral lesions (OCLs) clinically and radiologically.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 62 patients (35 males, 27 females; mean age 41±13 years; range, 15 to 65 years) diagnosed with talar OCLs between March 2007 and January 2015. Patients who were followed-up with a minimum of 24 months with lesions larger than 1 cm2 were included. Pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations were performed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and radiological evaluations according to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into microfracture (n=22) and scaffold (n=40) groups. The mean follow-up duration was 36.1±14.9 months. The mean preoperative AOFAS score increased from 60.6±13.9 to 82.1±11.8 in the microfracture group (p<0.001) and from 53.8±13.6 to 89.4±9.9 in the scaffold group (p<0.001). The scaffold group had superior results than the microfracture group clinically (p=0.011). Clinical results were superior in younger patients (<45 years) (p=0.018), male patients (p=0.020), and traumatic lesions (p=0.014). There was no significant difference between the two techniques according to the total MOCART scores (p=0.199). However, the scaffold technique was more successful in terms of lesion border and effusion subgoups of MOCART scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both single-step arthroscopic techniques are effective and safe in the treatment of talar OCLs. The scaffold technique showed superior clinical results than the microfracture technique in short-term follow-up. Age, trauma history and gender significantly affected the treatment outcomes. The scaffold technique can be considered as a safe and good alternative particularly in the treatment of large lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"97-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.64401\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.64401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较两种单步关节镜技术,微骨折和无细胞支架植入治疗距骨软骨病变(ocl)的临床和影像学效果。患者和方法:本回顾性研究纳入62例患者(男35例,女27例;平均年龄41±13岁;在2007年3月至2015年1月期间,年龄在15岁至65岁之间。随访至少24个月且病灶大于1cm2的患者纳入研究。术前和术后临床评价采用美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)踝后量表,影像学评价采用软骨修复组织磁共振观察(MOCART)量表。结果:患者分为微骨折组(22例)和支架组(40例)。平均随访36.1±14.9个月。微骨折组术前平均AOFAS评分由60.6±13.9上升至82.1±11.8。结论:单步关节镜技术治疗距骨骨鳞状细胞是安全有效的。短期随访中支架技术临床效果优于微骨折技术。年龄、创伤史和性别显著影响治疗结果。支架技术可以被认为是一种安全而良好的替代方法,特别是在治疗大病变方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of arthroscopic microfracture and cell-free scaffold implantation techniques in the treatment of talar osteochondral lesions.

Objectives: This study aims to compare two single-step arthroscopic techniques, microfracture and cell-free scaffold implantation, in the treatment of talar osteochondral lesions (OCLs) clinically and radiologically.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 62 patients (35 males, 27 females; mean age 41±13 years; range, 15 to 65 years) diagnosed with talar OCLs between March 2007 and January 2015. Patients who were followed-up with a minimum of 24 months with lesions larger than 1 cm2 were included. Pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations were performed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and radiological evaluations according to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scale.

Results: Patients were divided into microfracture (n=22) and scaffold (n=40) groups. The mean follow-up duration was 36.1±14.9 months. The mean preoperative AOFAS score increased from 60.6±13.9 to 82.1±11.8 in the microfracture group (p<0.001) and from 53.8±13.6 to 89.4±9.9 in the scaffold group (p<0.001). The scaffold group had superior results than the microfracture group clinically (p=0.011). Clinical results were superior in younger patients (<45 years) (p=0.018), male patients (p=0.020), and traumatic lesions (p=0.014). There was no significant difference between the two techniques according to the total MOCART scores (p=0.199). However, the scaffold technique was more successful in terms of lesion border and effusion subgoups of MOCART scale.

Conclusion: Both single-step arthroscopic techniques are effective and safe in the treatment of talar OCLs. The scaffold technique showed superior clinical results than the microfracture technique in short-term follow-up. Age, trauma history and gender significantly affected the treatment outcomes. The scaffold technique can be considered as a safe and good alternative particularly in the treatment of large lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
43.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (formerly published as Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi) is the official publication of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is open access journal. The full text of the articles of the Journal is freely available without embargo since 1990. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is international, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of joint diseases and related surgey.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic treatment of bilateral hallux saltans in an ordinary woman. Median nerve and carpal tunnel volume changes after two different surgical methods: A comparative magnetic resonance imaging study of mini-open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The effect of pentoxifylline on Achilles tendon healing in tenotomized rabbits. Icariin promotes early and late stages of fracture healing in rats. Comparison of three surgical methods in the treatment of intraarticular comminuted distal radius fractures: Volar locking plate, non-bridging external fixator, and bridging external fixator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1