两种不同解剖形状股骨远端钢板在尸体骨上的贴合评估。

Ali Utkan, Volkan İğdir, Aydın Arslan, Tülin Şen Esmer, Bülent Özkurt
{"title":"两种不同解剖形状股骨远端钢板在尸体骨上的贴合评估。","authors":"Ali Utkan,&nbsp;Volkan İğdir,&nbsp;Aydın Arslan,&nbsp;Tülin Şen Esmer,&nbsp;Bülent Özkurt","doi":"10.5606/ehc.2019.64940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the fitness of two anatomic distal femoral plates with cadaveric femurs and to show whether current plates optimally match each femur.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two different sets of plates with five, seven and nine shaft holes were applicated on 62 cadaveric femurs. Ball clay was molded onto the entire inner surfaces of the plates and then the plates were fixed to the bones using two self-locking nylon cable zip ties. The volume of ball clay sandwiched in between the plate and bone was calculated and used as a quantitative fit parameter. Data of each plate were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Double Medical Technology IncorporatedTM plates, the mean plate to bone volumes were calculated as 8.4 mL (range, 5-14 mL), 10.0 mL (range, 6-17 mL), and 13.1 mL (range, 7-25 mL) in five, seven and nine-hole plates, respectively. Using Zimmer Biomet IncorporatedTM plates, the mean volumes were 10.5 mL (range, 6-21 mL), 12.7 mL (range, 7-22 mL) and 16.3 mL (range, 8-30 mL) in five, seven and nine-hole plates, respectively. Within each group, the measurements were significantly correlated positively with femoral length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimal fit may not be achieved in each femur using current distal femoral plate implant sets. Thus additional sizes of plates should be supplied in the implant sets.</p>","PeriodicalId":50551,"journal":{"name":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","volume":"30 2","pages":"137-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fit assessment of two different anatomically contoured distal femur plate sets on cadaveric bones.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Utkan,&nbsp;Volkan İğdir,&nbsp;Aydın Arslan,&nbsp;Tülin Şen Esmer,&nbsp;Bülent Özkurt\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/ehc.2019.64940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the fitness of two anatomic distal femoral plates with cadaveric femurs and to show whether current plates optimally match each femur.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two different sets of plates with five, seven and nine shaft holes were applicated on 62 cadaveric femurs. Ball clay was molded onto the entire inner surfaces of the plates and then the plates were fixed to the bones using two self-locking nylon cable zip ties. The volume of ball clay sandwiched in between the plate and bone was calculated and used as a quantitative fit parameter. Data of each plate were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Double Medical Technology IncorporatedTM plates, the mean plate to bone volumes were calculated as 8.4 mL (range, 5-14 mL), 10.0 mL (range, 6-17 mL), and 13.1 mL (range, 7-25 mL) in five, seven and nine-hole plates, respectively. Using Zimmer Biomet IncorporatedTM plates, the mean volumes were 10.5 mL (range, 6-21 mL), 12.7 mL (range, 7-22 mL) and 16.3 mL (range, 8-30 mL) in five, seven and nine-hole plates, respectively. Within each group, the measurements were significantly correlated positively with femoral length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimal fit may not be achieved in each femur using current distal femoral plate implant sets. Thus additional sizes of plates should be supplied in the implant sets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"137-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.64940\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.64940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨两个解剖股骨远端钢板与尸体股骨的适应性,并显示当前钢板是否与每根股骨最佳匹配。材料与方法:将5孔、7孔和9孔两组不同的钢板应用于62具尸体股骨。球粘土被模压在钢板的整个内表面上,然后用两个自锁尼龙电缆拉链将钢板固定在骨头上。计算了夹在板与骨之间的球泥体积,并将其作为定量拟合参数。各板数据分别进行分析。结果:采用Double Medical Technology公司的tm板,计算出五孔、七孔和九孔板的平均板骨体积分别为8.4 mL(范围5-14 mL)、10.0 mL(范围6-17 mL)和13.1 mL(范围7-25 mL)。使用Zimmer Biomet incorporated™板,五孔、七孔和九孔板的平均体积分别为10.5 mL(范围6-21 mL)、12.7 mL(范围7-22 mL)和16.3 mL(范围8-30 mL)。在每一组中,测量值与股骨长度显著正相关。结论:目前使用的股骨远端钢板植入装置可能无法达到最佳配合。因此,在植入装置中应提供额外尺寸的钢板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fit assessment of two different anatomically contoured distal femur plate sets on cadaveric bones.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the fitness of two anatomic distal femoral plates with cadaveric femurs and to show whether current plates optimally match each femur.

Materials and methods: Two different sets of plates with five, seven and nine shaft holes were applicated on 62 cadaveric femurs. Ball clay was molded onto the entire inner surfaces of the plates and then the plates were fixed to the bones using two self-locking nylon cable zip ties. The volume of ball clay sandwiched in between the plate and bone was calculated and used as a quantitative fit parameter. Data of each plate were analyzed separately.

Results: Using Double Medical Technology IncorporatedTM plates, the mean plate to bone volumes were calculated as 8.4 mL (range, 5-14 mL), 10.0 mL (range, 6-17 mL), and 13.1 mL (range, 7-25 mL) in five, seven and nine-hole plates, respectively. Using Zimmer Biomet IncorporatedTM plates, the mean volumes were 10.5 mL (range, 6-21 mL), 12.7 mL (range, 7-22 mL) and 16.3 mL (range, 8-30 mL) in five, seven and nine-hole plates, respectively. Within each group, the measurements were significantly correlated positively with femoral length.

Conclusion: Optimal fit may not be achieved in each femur using current distal femoral plate implant sets. Thus additional sizes of plates should be supplied in the implant sets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
43.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (formerly published as Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi) is the official publication of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is open access journal. The full text of the articles of the Journal is freely available without embargo since 1990. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is international, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of joint diseases and related surgey.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic treatment of bilateral hallux saltans in an ordinary woman. Median nerve and carpal tunnel volume changes after two different surgical methods: A comparative magnetic resonance imaging study of mini-open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The effect of pentoxifylline on Achilles tendon healing in tenotomized rabbits. Icariin promotes early and late stages of fracture healing in rats. Comparison of three surgical methods in the treatment of intraarticular comminuted distal radius fractures: Volar locking plate, non-bridging external fixator, and bridging external fixator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1