减少药物准备和给药过程中的中断。

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE Pub Date : 2019-07-08 DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0238
Alberto Mortaro, Diana Pascu, Serena Pancheri, Mariangela Mazzi, Stefano Tardivo, Claudio Bellamoli, Federica Ferrarese, Albino Poli, Gabriele Romano, Francesca Moretti
{"title":"减少药物准备和给药过程中的中断。","authors":"Alberto Mortaro,&nbsp;Diana Pascu,&nbsp;Serena Pancheri,&nbsp;Mariangela Mazzi,&nbsp;Stefano Tardivo,&nbsp;Claudio Bellamoli,&nbsp;Federica Ferrarese,&nbsp;Albino Poli,&nbsp;Gabriele Romano,&nbsp;Francesca Moretti","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>According to literature, interruptions during drug administration lead to a significant proportion of medication errors. Evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce interruption is still limited. The purpose of this paper is to explore main reasons for interruptions during drug administration rounds in a geriatric ward of an Italian secondary hospital and test the effectiveness of a combined intervention.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This is a pre and post-intervention observational study based on direct observation. All nurse staff (24) participated to the study that lead to observe a total of 44 drug dispensing rounds with 945 drugs administered to 491 patients in T0 and 994 drugs to 506 patients in T1.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A significant reduction of raw number of interruptions (mean per round from 17.31 in T0 to 9.09 in T1, <i>p</i><0.01), interruptions/patient rate (from 0.78 in T0 to 0.40 in T1, <i>p</i><0.01) and interruptions/drugs rate (from 0.44 in T0 to 0.22 in T1, <i>p</i><0.01) were observed. Needs for further improvements were elicited (e.g. a greater involvement of support staff).</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Nurse staff should be adequately trained on the risks related to interruptions during drug administration since routine activity is at high risk of distractions due to its repetitive and skill-based nature.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>A strong involvement of both MB and leadership, together with the frontline staff, helped to raise staff motivation and guide a bottom-up approach, able to identify tailored interventions and serve concurrently as training instrument tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0238","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing interruptions during medication preparation and administration.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Mortaro,&nbsp;Diana Pascu,&nbsp;Serena Pancheri,&nbsp;Mariangela Mazzi,&nbsp;Stefano Tardivo,&nbsp;Claudio Bellamoli,&nbsp;Federica Ferrarese,&nbsp;Albino Poli,&nbsp;Gabriele Romano,&nbsp;Francesca Moretti\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>According to literature, interruptions during drug administration lead to a significant proportion of medication errors. Evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce interruption is still limited. The purpose of this paper is to explore main reasons for interruptions during drug administration rounds in a geriatric ward of an Italian secondary hospital and test the effectiveness of a combined intervention.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This is a pre and post-intervention observational study based on direct observation. All nurse staff (24) participated to the study that lead to observe a total of 44 drug dispensing rounds with 945 drugs administered to 491 patients in T0 and 994 drugs to 506 patients in T1.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A significant reduction of raw number of interruptions (mean per round from 17.31 in T0 to 9.09 in T1, <i>p</i><0.01), interruptions/patient rate (from 0.78 in T0 to 0.40 in T1, <i>p</i><0.01) and interruptions/drugs rate (from 0.44 in T0 to 0.22 in T1, <i>p</i><0.01) were observed. Needs for further improvements were elicited (e.g. a greater involvement of support staff).</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Nurse staff should be adequately trained on the risks related to interruptions during drug administration since routine activity is at high risk of distractions due to its repetitive and skill-based nature.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>A strong involvement of both MB and leadership, together with the frontline staff, helped to raise staff motivation and guide a bottom-up approach, able to identify tailored interventions and serve concurrently as training instrument tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0238\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:文献资料显示,用药中断是导致用药错误的主要原因。关于减少中断的干预措施有效性的证据仍然有限。本文的目的是探讨在意大利二级医院的老年病房药物管理轮中断的主要原因,并测试联合干预的有效性。设计/方法/方法:这是一项基于直接观察的干预前后观察性研究。所有护理人员(24名)参与了研究,共观察了44个调剂轮,T0为491例患者发放了945种药物,T1为506例患者发放了994种药物。研究结果:中断的原始次数显著减少(平均每轮从2010年的17.31次减少到2015年的9.09次)。实际意义:由于常规活动的重复性和技质性,使其具有较高的分心风险,因此应对护理人员进行充分的药物给药中断风险培训。创意/价值:部门经理和领导层与前线员工的积极参与,有助于提高员工的积极性,并指导自下而上的方法,能够确定量身定制的干预措施,同时作为培训工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reducing interruptions during medication preparation and administration.

Purpose: According to literature, interruptions during drug administration lead to a significant proportion of medication errors. Evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce interruption is still limited. The purpose of this paper is to explore main reasons for interruptions during drug administration rounds in a geriatric ward of an Italian secondary hospital and test the effectiveness of a combined intervention.

Design/methodology/approach: This is a pre and post-intervention observational study based on direct observation. All nurse staff (24) participated to the study that lead to observe a total of 44 drug dispensing rounds with 945 drugs administered to 491 patients in T0 and 994 drugs to 506 patients in T1.

Findings: A significant reduction of raw number of interruptions (mean per round from 17.31 in T0 to 9.09 in T1, p<0.01), interruptions/patient rate (from 0.78 in T0 to 0.40 in T1, p<0.01) and interruptions/drugs rate (from 0.44 in T0 to 0.22 in T1, p<0.01) were observed. Needs for further improvements were elicited (e.g. a greater involvement of support staff).

Practical implications: Nurse staff should be adequately trained on the risks related to interruptions during drug administration since routine activity is at high risk of distractions due to its repetitive and skill-based nature.

Originality/value: A strong involvement of both MB and leadership, together with the frontline staff, helped to raise staff motivation and guide a bottom-up approach, able to identify tailored interventions and serve concurrently as training instrument tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
A cross-organizational Lean deployment in an Italian regional healthcare system. The mediating effect of patient trust on the relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction. Evaluating patient and medical staff satisfaction from doctor-patient communication. Lean six sigma and stroke in rural hospital - The case of Baruch Padeh Medical Center. Examining the behavioural intention of inpatients in Indian government hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1