欧洲50岁以上人口的非正式照顾、就业状况和工作时间

IF 2.4 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economist-Netherlands Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-05-31 DOI:10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1
Nicola Ciccarelli, Arthur Van Soest
{"title":"欧洲50岁以上人口的非正式照顾、就业状况和工作时间","authors":"Nicola Ciccarelli,&nbsp;Arthur Van Soest","doi":"10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using panel data on the age group 50-70 in 15 European countries, we analyze the effects of providing informal care to parents, parents-in-law, stepparents, and grandparents on employment status and work hours. We account for fixed individual effects and test for endogeneity of caregiving using moments exploiting standard instruments (e.g., parental death) as well as higher-order moment conditions (Lewbel instruments). Specification tests suggest that informal care provision and daily caregiving can be treated as exogenous variables. We find a significant and negative effect of daily caregiving on employment status and work hours. This effect is particularly strong for women. On the other hand, providing care at a weekly (or less than weekly) frequency does not significantly affect paid work. We do not find evidence of heterogeneous effects of caregiving on paid work across European regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46156,"journal":{"name":"Economist-Netherlands","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informal Caregiving, Employment Status and Work Hours of the 50+ Population in Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Ciccarelli,&nbsp;Arthur Van Soest\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using panel data on the age group 50-70 in 15 European countries, we analyze the effects of providing informal care to parents, parents-in-law, stepparents, and grandparents on employment status and work hours. We account for fixed individual effects and test for endogeneity of caregiving using moments exploiting standard instruments (e.g., parental death) as well as higher-order moment conditions (Lewbel instruments). Specification tests suggest that informal care provision and daily caregiving can be treated as exogenous variables. We find a significant and negative effect of daily caregiving on employment status and work hours. This effect is particularly strong for women. On the other hand, providing care at a weekly (or less than weekly) frequency does not significantly affect paid work. We do not find evidence of heterogeneous effects of caregiving on paid work across European regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economist-Netherlands\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economist-Netherlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economist-Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

利用15个欧洲国家50-70岁年龄组的面板数据,我们分析了为父母、公公婆婆、继父母和祖父母提供非正式照顾对就业状况和工作时间的影响。我们解释了固定的个体效应,并使用利用标准工具(例如,父母死亡)以及高阶矩条件(Lewbel工具)的矩来检验照顾的内生性。规范检验表明,非正式护理提供和日常护理可以被视为外生变量。我们发现日常照顾对就业状况和工作时间有显著的负向影响。这种影响对女性来说尤其明显。另一方面,每周(或少于每周)提供一次护理对有偿工作没有显著影响。我们没有发现证据表明,在整个欧洲地区,照顾对有偿工作的影响是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Informal Caregiving, Employment Status and Work Hours of the 50+ Population in Europe.

Using panel data on the age group 50-70 in 15 European countries, we analyze the effects of providing informal care to parents, parents-in-law, stepparents, and grandparents on employment status and work hours. We account for fixed individual effects and test for endogeneity of caregiving using moments exploiting standard instruments (e.g., parental death) as well as higher-order moment conditions (Lewbel instruments). Specification tests suggest that informal care provision and daily caregiving can be treated as exogenous variables. We find a significant and negative effect of daily caregiving on employment status and work hours. This effect is particularly strong for women. On the other hand, providing care at a weekly (or less than weekly) frequency does not significantly affect paid work. We do not find evidence of heterogeneous effects of caregiving on paid work across European regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Since 1852, De Economist, the Netherlands Economic Review, has provided an outlet for high quality research in economics. Emphasizing European issues, it offers insightful studies that deal with theoretical issues as well as applied work. The journal also publishes important surveys of current research. Authors of articles based on empirical research are required to make their datasets available to readers, enabling them to replicate the research results. Officially cited as: De Economist
期刊最新文献
The Price of Flexible Jobs: Wage Differentials between Permanent and Flexible Jobs in the Netherlands Distortions in Investment Timing and Quantity in Real Options with Asymmetric Information Call for Papers: Special Issue on "Scientific Insights to Deliver Sustainable Growth and Full Employment" Call for Papers: Special Issue on “Inequality in the Housing Market” Foreign Supply Shocks and the Structure of Trade in a Small Open Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1