在怀疑用枪械偷猎时,法医和兽医意见中的法医痕迹。

Marian Flis, Bogusław Rataj
{"title":"在怀疑用枪械偷猎时,法医和兽医意见中的法医痕迹。","authors":"Marian Flis,&nbsp;Bogusław Rataj","doi":"10.5114/amsik.2018.84529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The paper presents the principles which govern evaluation of poaching crimes with the use of firearms during preparation of court opinions based on secured forensic traces. In many cases, secured evidence does not allow for post-mortem examination; it becomes necessary to use other methods of assessing the evidence.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Such assessments are based on photographic documentation of the scene, as well as secured fragments of tissue, and sometimes also bullets or their parts. In many cases, the secured evidence allows for the use of simple research methods or experiments that make it possible to determine the facts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Such comprehensive analyses lead to precise determination of both the species of animals and the cause of their death and should be used in forensic and veterinary opinions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35709,"journal":{"name":"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/amsik.2018.84529","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forensic traces in forensic and veterinary opinions in case of suspicion of poaching with firearms.\",\"authors\":\"Marian Flis,&nbsp;Bogusław Rataj\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/amsik.2018.84529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The paper presents the principles which govern evaluation of poaching crimes with the use of firearms during preparation of court opinions based on secured forensic traces. In many cases, secured evidence does not allow for post-mortem examination; it becomes necessary to use other methods of assessing the evidence.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Such assessments are based on photographic documentation of the scene, as well as secured fragments of tissue, and sometimes also bullets or their parts. In many cases, the secured evidence allows for the use of simple research methods or experiments that make it possible to determine the facts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Such comprehensive analyses lead to precise determination of both the species of animals and the cause of their death and should be used in forensic and veterinary opinions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/amsik.2018.84529\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsik.2018.84529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsik.2018.84529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究目的:本文介绍了在根据有保障的法医痕迹准备法庭意见时,对使用枪支偷猎犯罪进行评估的原则。在许多情况下,安全证据不允许进行尸检;有必要使用其他方法来评估证据。材料和方法:这种评估是基于现场的照片记录,以及固定的组织碎片,有时也包括子弹或其部分。在许多情况下,获得的证据允许使用简单的研究方法或实验,从而有可能确定事实。结果:综合分析可以准确地确定动物的种类和死亡原因,可用于法医和兽医意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forensic traces in forensic and veterinary opinions in case of suspicion of poaching with firearms.

Aim of the study: The paper presents the principles which govern evaluation of poaching crimes with the use of firearms during preparation of court opinions based on secured forensic traces. In many cases, secured evidence does not allow for post-mortem examination; it becomes necessary to use other methods of assessing the evidence.

Material and methods: Such assessments are based on photographic documentation of the scene, as well as secured fragments of tissue, and sometimes also bullets or their parts. In many cases, the secured evidence allows for the use of simple research methods or experiments that make it possible to determine the facts.

Results: Such comprehensive analyses lead to precise determination of both the species of animals and the cause of their death and should be used in forensic and veterinary opinions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archiwum Medycyny Sądowej i Kryminologii przyjmuje w języku polskim: prace doświadczalne, poglądowe, kazuistyczne, artykuły o charakterze szkoleniowym z medycyny sądowej, kryminologii i dziedzin pokrewnych, opracowania z zakresu etyki i deontologii lekarskiej, streszczenia prac obcych, oceny książek, sprawozdania z działalności PTMSiK, sprawozdania ze zjazdów krajowych i zagranicznych, komunikaty Zarządu Głównego PTMSiK, listy do Redakcji. Autor powinien podać, do jakiej kategorii zalicza tekst nadesłanej pracy. Przyjmowane do druku będą również prace autorów zagranicznych w języku angielskim.
期刊最新文献
Supplement to the work „Smoothbore hunting ammunition – a historical overview” Pro Memoria: Prof. Roman Mądro (1943-2023) Pro Memoria: prof. Jerzy Jan Janica (1939-2022) Review of the experiences of users of methaqualone and methaqualone derivatives. An analysis of online forums. COVID-19-related excess mortality - an overview of the current evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1