endoanchor在具有挑战性的近端颈部腹主动脉瘤血管内修复中的应用:单中心经验。

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2019-04-24 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2048004019845508
Rocco Giudice, Ottavia Borghese, Giorgio Sbenaglia, Carlo Coscarella, Claudia De Gregorio, Marco Leopardi, Gabriele Pogany
{"title":"endoanchor在具有挑战性的近端颈部腹主动脉瘤血管内修复中的应用:单中心经验。","authors":"Rocco Giudice,&nbsp;Ottavia Borghese,&nbsp;Giorgio Sbenaglia,&nbsp;Carlo Coscarella,&nbsp;Claudia De Gregorio,&nbsp;Marco Leopardi,&nbsp;Gabriele Pogany","doi":"10.1177/2048004019845508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to present a single-centre experience with EndoAnchors in patients who underwent endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms with challenging proximal neck, both in the prevention and treatment of endograft migration and type Ia endoleaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed 17 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors between June 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. EndoAnchors were applied during the initial endovascular aneurysm repair procedure (primary implant) to prevent proximal neck complications in difficult anatomies (nine patients), and in the follow-up after aneurysm exclusion (secondary implant) to correct type Ia endoleak and/or stent-graft migration (eight patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean time for anchors implant was 23 min (range 12-41), with a mean of 5 EndoAnchors deployed per patient. Six patients in the secondary implant group required a proximal cuff due to stent-graft migration ≥10 mm. Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no complications related to deployment of the anchors. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 4-39, interquartile range 9-20), there were no aneurysm-related deaths or aneurysm ruptures, and all patients were free from reinterventions. CT-scan surveillance showed no evidence of type Ia endoleak, anchors dislodgement or stent-graft migration, with a mean reduction of aneurysm diameter of 0.4 mm (range 0-19); there was no sac growth or aortic neck enlargement in any case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EndoAnchors can be safely used in the prevention and treatment of type Ia endoleaks in patients with challenging aortic necks, with good results in terms of sac exclusion and diameter reduction in the mid-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"8 ","pages":"2048004019845508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004019845508","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of EndoAnchors in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with challenging proximal neck: Single-centre experience.\",\"authors\":\"Rocco Giudice,&nbsp;Ottavia Borghese,&nbsp;Giorgio Sbenaglia,&nbsp;Carlo Coscarella,&nbsp;Claudia De Gregorio,&nbsp;Marco Leopardi,&nbsp;Gabriele Pogany\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2048004019845508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to present a single-centre experience with EndoAnchors in patients who underwent endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms with challenging proximal neck, both in the prevention and treatment of endograft migration and type Ia endoleaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed 17 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors between June 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. EndoAnchors were applied during the initial endovascular aneurysm repair procedure (primary implant) to prevent proximal neck complications in difficult anatomies (nine patients), and in the follow-up after aneurysm exclusion (secondary implant) to correct type Ia endoleak and/or stent-graft migration (eight patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean time for anchors implant was 23 min (range 12-41), with a mean of 5 EndoAnchors deployed per patient. Six patients in the secondary implant group required a proximal cuff due to stent-graft migration ≥10 mm. Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no complications related to deployment of the anchors. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 4-39, interquartile range 9-20), there were no aneurysm-related deaths or aneurysm ruptures, and all patients were free from reinterventions. CT-scan surveillance showed no evidence of type Ia endoleak, anchors dislodgement or stent-graft migration, with a mean reduction of aneurysm diameter of 0.4 mm (range 0-19); there was no sac growth or aortic neck enlargement in any case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EndoAnchors can be safely used in the prevention and treatment of type Ia endoleaks in patients with challenging aortic necks, with good results in terms of sac exclusion and diameter reduction in the mid-term follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"2048004019845508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004019845508\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004019845508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004019845508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是介绍endoanchor在对具有挑战性的近端腹主动脉瘤进行血管内修复的患者中的单中心经验,包括预防和治疗内移植物迁移和Ia型内漏。方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年6月至2018年5月在我院连续接受endoanchor治疗的17例患者。在初始血管内动脉瘤修复手术(一次植入)中应用endoanchor,以防止困难解剖的近端颈部并发症(9例),并在动脉瘤排除后的随访(二次植入)中纠正Ia型内漏和/或支架移植物迁移(8例)。结果:锚植入的平均时间为23分钟(范围12-41),平均每位患者部署5个endoanchor。由于支架移植物迁移≥10 mm,二次种植组中有6例患者需要近端袖带。所有病例均取得了技术上的成功,没有出现与锚部署相关的并发症。在中位随访13个月(范围4-39,四分位数范围9-20),无动脉瘤相关死亡或动脉瘤破裂,所有患者均无再干预。ct扫描监测未发现Ia型内漏、锚钉移位或支架移植物迁移的证据,动脉瘤直径平均缩小0.4 mm(范围0-19);所有病例均无囊生长或主动脉颈增大。结论:endoanchor可以安全的预防和治疗挑战性主动脉颈患者的Ia型内漏,在中期随访中囊囊排除和内径缩小效果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The use of EndoAnchors in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with challenging proximal neck: Single-centre experience.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to present a single-centre experience with EndoAnchors in patients who underwent endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms with challenging proximal neck, both in the prevention and treatment of endograft migration and type Ia endoleaks.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 17 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors between June 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. EndoAnchors were applied during the initial endovascular aneurysm repair procedure (primary implant) to prevent proximal neck complications in difficult anatomies (nine patients), and in the follow-up after aneurysm exclusion (secondary implant) to correct type Ia endoleak and/or stent-graft migration (eight patients).

Results: Mean time for anchors implant was 23 min (range 12-41), with a mean of 5 EndoAnchors deployed per patient. Six patients in the secondary implant group required a proximal cuff due to stent-graft migration ≥10 mm. Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no complications related to deployment of the anchors. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 4-39, interquartile range 9-20), there were no aneurysm-related deaths or aneurysm ruptures, and all patients were free from reinterventions. CT-scan surveillance showed no evidence of type Ia endoleak, anchors dislodgement or stent-graft migration, with a mean reduction of aneurysm diameter of 0.4 mm (range 0-19); there was no sac growth or aortic neck enlargement in any case.

Conclusions: EndoAnchors can be safely used in the prevention and treatment of type Ia endoleaks in patients with challenging aortic necks, with good results in terms of sac exclusion and diameter reduction in the mid-term follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genetic background and clinical phenotype in a Vietnamese cohort with Brugada syndrome: A whole exome sequencing study. Biplane 3D overlay guidance for congenital heart disease to assist cardiac catheterization interventions-A pilot study. Impact of the completeness of revascularization and high bleeding risk status in acute coronary syndrome patients with multi-vessel disease: A retrospective analysis. Metabolic syndrome and its associated factors among adults with cardiac diseases: A cross-sectional comparative group study. Causal roles of immune cells in cardiovascular diseases: A Mendelian randomization (MR) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1