立体定向放射外科治疗10个或10个以上脑转移瘤患者。

Q2 Medicine Progress in neurological surgery Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-16 DOI:10.1159/000493056
Masaaki Yamamoto, Yoshinori Higuchi, Yasunori Sato, Hidetoshi Aiyama, Hidetoshi Kasuya, Bierta E Barfod
{"title":"立体定向放射外科治疗10个或10个以上脑转移瘤患者。","authors":"Masaaki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yoshinori Higuchi,&nbsp;Yasunori Sato,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Aiyama,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Kasuya,&nbsp;Bierta E Barfod","doi":"10.1159/000493056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The JLGK0901 study showed the non-inferiority of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as the initial treatment for 5-10 as compared to 2-4 brain metastases (BM) in terms of overall survival and most secondary endpoints [Lancet Oncol 2014;15:387-395]. A trend for patients with 5-10 tumors to undergo SRS alone has since become apparent. The next step is to reappraise whether results of SRS treatment alone for tumor numbers ≥10 differ from those for 2-9 tumors. During the past 2 decades, several retrospective studies have demonstrated the SRS alone treatment strategy to have certain benefits for carefully selected patients with ≥10 BM, i.e., a sufficiently long survival period with lower incidences of neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, and SRS-related complications. Herein, we introduce our Mito experiences with SRS for ≥10 BM, employing a case-matched study on 934 patients, 467 each in groups with 2-9 BM and ≥10 BM. Post-SRS treatment results, i.e., median survival time, neurological death-free survival time and cumulative incidences of local recurrence, repeat SRS for new lesions, neurological deterioration, and SRS-related complications, were not inferior for patients with ≥10 BM as compared to those with 2-9 BM. We conclude that patients with ≥10 tumors are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":39342,"journal":{"name":"Progress in neurological surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000493056","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with 10 or More Brain Metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Masaaki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yoshinori Higuchi,&nbsp;Yasunori Sato,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Aiyama,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Kasuya,&nbsp;Bierta E Barfod\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000493056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The JLGK0901 study showed the non-inferiority of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as the initial treatment for 5-10 as compared to 2-4 brain metastases (BM) in terms of overall survival and most secondary endpoints [Lancet Oncol 2014;15:387-395]. A trend for patients with 5-10 tumors to undergo SRS alone has since become apparent. The next step is to reappraise whether results of SRS treatment alone for tumor numbers ≥10 differ from those for 2-9 tumors. During the past 2 decades, several retrospective studies have demonstrated the SRS alone treatment strategy to have certain benefits for carefully selected patients with ≥10 BM, i.e., a sufficiently long survival period with lower incidences of neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, and SRS-related complications. Herein, we introduce our Mito experiences with SRS for ≥10 BM, employing a case-matched study on 934 patients, 467 each in groups with 2-9 BM and ≥10 BM. Post-SRS treatment results, i.e., median survival time, neurological death-free survival time and cumulative incidences of local recurrence, repeat SRS for new lesions, neurological deterioration, and SRS-related complications, were not inferior for patients with ≥10 BM as compared to those with 2-9 BM. We conclude that patients with ≥10 tumors are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in neurological surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000493056\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in neurological surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000493056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in neurological surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000493056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

JLGK0901研究显示,在总生存期和大多数次要终点方面,单纯立体定向放射手术(SRS)作为5-10脑转移(BM)的初始治疗与2-4脑转移(BM)相比具有非劣效性[Lancet Oncol 2014;15:387-395]。5-10个肿瘤的患者单独接受SRS的趋势已经变得明显。下一步是重新评估SRS单独治疗≥10个肿瘤的结果是否与2-9个肿瘤的结果不同。在过去的20年里,一些回顾性研究表明,对于精心挑选的≥10 BM的患者,SRS单独治疗策略具有一定的益处,即足够长的生存期,神经系统死亡、神经系统恶化、局部复发和SRS相关并发症的发生率较低。在此,我们介绍了Mito在≥10 BM的患者中使用SRS的经验,采用了一项病例匹配研究,934例患者,2-9 BM组和≥10 BM组各467例。SRS治疗后的结果,即中位生存时间、神经系统无死亡生存时间和局部复发、新病灶重复SRS、神经系统恶化和SRS相关并发症的累积发生率,≥10 BM的患者与2-9 BM的患者相比并不逊色。我们得出结论,≥10个肿瘤的患者不是单独进行SRS的不利候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with 10 or More Brain Metastases.

The JLGK0901 study showed the non-inferiority of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as the initial treatment for 5-10 as compared to 2-4 brain metastases (BM) in terms of overall survival and most secondary endpoints [Lancet Oncol 2014;15:387-395]. A trend for patients with 5-10 tumors to undergo SRS alone has since become apparent. The next step is to reappraise whether results of SRS treatment alone for tumor numbers ≥10 differ from those for 2-9 tumors. During the past 2 decades, several retrospective studies have demonstrated the SRS alone treatment strategy to have certain benefits for carefully selected patients with ≥10 BM, i.e., a sufficiently long survival period with lower incidences of neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, and SRS-related complications. Herein, we introduce our Mito experiences with SRS for ≥10 BM, employing a case-matched study on 934 patients, 467 each in groups with 2-9 BM and ≥10 BM. Post-SRS treatment results, i.e., median survival time, neurological death-free survival time and cumulative incidences of local recurrence, repeat SRS for new lesions, neurological deterioration, and SRS-related complications, were not inferior for patients with ≥10 BM as compared to those with 2-9 BM. We conclude that patients with ≥10 tumors are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published since 1966, this series has become universally recognized as the most significant group of books serving neurological surgeons. Volumes feature contributions from distinguished international surgeons, who brilliantly review the literature from the perspective of their own personal experience. The result is a series of works providing critical distillations of developments of central importance to the theory and practice of neurological surgery.
期刊最新文献
Neuromodulation for Facial Pain Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Facial Pain Using Conventional Devices: Indications and Results. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Headache Syndromes. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Facial Pain. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Facial Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1