神经心理评估史。

Q3 Medicine Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-30 DOI:10.1159/000494963
Paul Eling
{"title":"神经心理评估史。","authors":"Paul Eling","doi":"10.1159/000494963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This chapter presents a historical overview of observations, instruments, and approaches in the area of neuropsychological assessment. In the 17th and 18th century literature dealing especially with language disorders following a brain disorder, one finds observations of physicians of striking dissociations of mental faculties that were impaired while others remained intact. Around the middle of the 19th century, neuropsychiatrists like Carl Wernicke began to develop procedures for assessing more specific components of mental functioning. German physicians, Conrad Rieger and Theodor Ziehen, seem to have developed the first neuropsychological test batteries. Kurt Goldstein, inspired by the rising Gestalt theory, argued that not the test score but the strategy used by a patient to perform a task is important. Alexander Luria also promoted an approach to assessment that was mainly based on subjective judgment. Studies on individual differences led to the development of an intelligence test battery by Alfred Binet. This battery was later transformed into the Army Alpha and Army Beta tests for selecting soldiers. Components of these intelligence tests have survived in the test kit of the modern neuropsychologist. This tradition also stimulated the development of psychometric analysis of tests. Two pioneers in the field of neuropsychological assessment were Shepherd Ivory Franz, favoring a clinical approach, and Ward Halstead, stimulating a strongly psychometric-based approach. The evaluation of language disorders has always been a specific area, requiring its own set of tests. The first comprehensive language battery was compiled by Bastian. Around the middle of the 20th century, when the localization of function approach had been rejected, neurologists preferred to examine language disorders clinically, using a battery that evaluated speech, comprehension, reading, and writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":35285,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000494963","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History of Neuropsychological Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Eling\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000494963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This chapter presents a historical overview of observations, instruments, and approaches in the area of neuropsychological assessment. In the 17th and 18th century literature dealing especially with language disorders following a brain disorder, one finds observations of physicians of striking dissociations of mental faculties that were impaired while others remained intact. Around the middle of the 19th century, neuropsychiatrists like Carl Wernicke began to develop procedures for assessing more specific components of mental functioning. German physicians, Conrad Rieger and Theodor Ziehen, seem to have developed the first neuropsychological test batteries. Kurt Goldstein, inspired by the rising Gestalt theory, argued that not the test score but the strategy used by a patient to perform a task is important. Alexander Luria also promoted an approach to assessment that was mainly based on subjective judgment. Studies on individual differences led to the development of an intelligence test battery by Alfred Binet. This battery was later transformed into the Army Alpha and Army Beta tests for selecting soldiers. Components of these intelligence tests have survived in the test kit of the modern neuropsychologist. This tradition also stimulated the development of psychometric analysis of tests. Two pioneers in the field of neuropsychological assessment were Shepherd Ivory Franz, favoring a clinical approach, and Ward Halstead, stimulating a strongly psychometric-based approach. The evaluation of language disorders has always been a specific area, requiring its own set of tests. The first comprehensive language battery was compiled by Bastian. Around the middle of the 20th century, when the localization of function approach had been rejected, neurologists preferred to examine language disorders clinically, using a battery that evaluated speech, comprehension, reading, and writing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000494963\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000494963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000494963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本章介绍了神经心理学评估领域的观察、仪器和方法的历史概述。在17世纪和18世纪的文献中,特别是处理大脑紊乱后的语言障碍的文献中,人们发现医生观察到,一些人的精神机能出现了明显的分离,有些人的精神机能受损,而有些人的精神机能完好无损。大约在19世纪中叶,卡尔·韦尼克(Carl Wernicke)等神经精神病学家开始开发评估心理功能更具体组成部分的程序。德国医生康拉德·里格尔(Conrad Rieger)和西奥多·齐亨(Theodor Ziehen)似乎发明了第一批神经心理学测试电池。库尔特·戈尔茨坦(Kurt Goldstein)受到正在兴起的格式塔理论的启发,认为重要的不是测试分数,而是患者执行任务时使用的策略。亚历山大·卢里亚还提倡一种主要基于主观判断的评估方法。对个体差异的研究导致了阿尔弗雷德·比奈智力测试的发展。这个电池后来被转化为陆军Alpha和陆军Beta测试,用于选拔士兵。这些智力测验的组成部分保存在现代神经心理学家的测试工具中。这一传统也刺激了心理测试分析的发展。神经心理学评估领域的两位先驱者是支持临床方法的弗朗茨(Shepherd Ivory Franz)和推崇以心理测量学为基础的方法的霍尔斯特德(Ward Halstead)。语言障碍的评估一直是一个特定的领域,需要自己的一套测试。第一个综合语言集是由巴斯蒂安编写的。大约在20世纪中叶,当功能定位方法被拒绝时,神经学家更倾向于在临床上检查语言障碍,使用评估语言,理解,阅读和写作的电池。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
History of Neuropsychological Assessment.

This chapter presents a historical overview of observations, instruments, and approaches in the area of neuropsychological assessment. In the 17th and 18th century literature dealing especially with language disorders following a brain disorder, one finds observations of physicians of striking dissociations of mental faculties that were impaired while others remained intact. Around the middle of the 19th century, neuropsychiatrists like Carl Wernicke began to develop procedures for assessing more specific components of mental functioning. German physicians, Conrad Rieger and Theodor Ziehen, seem to have developed the first neuropsychological test batteries. Kurt Goldstein, inspired by the rising Gestalt theory, argued that not the test score but the strategy used by a patient to perform a task is important. Alexander Luria also promoted an approach to assessment that was mainly based on subjective judgment. Studies on individual differences led to the development of an intelligence test battery by Alfred Binet. This battery was later transformed into the Army Alpha and Army Beta tests for selecting soldiers. Components of these intelligence tests have survived in the test kit of the modern neuropsychologist. This tradition also stimulated the development of psychometric analysis of tests. Two pioneers in the field of neuropsychological assessment were Shepherd Ivory Franz, favoring a clinical approach, and Ward Halstead, stimulating a strongly psychometric-based approach. The evaluation of language disorders has always been a specific area, requiring its own set of tests. The first comprehensive language battery was compiled by Bastian. Around the middle of the 20th century, when the localization of function approach had been rejected, neurologists preferred to examine language disorders clinically, using a battery that evaluated speech, comprehension, reading, and writing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience
Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Focusing on topics in the fields of both Neurosciences and Neurology, this series provides current and unique information in basic and clinical advances on the nervous system and its disorders.
期刊最新文献
Interaction between Orexin Neurons and Monoaminergic Systems. Causes and Consequences of Chronic Sleep Deficiency and the Role of Orexin. Subsecond Ensemble Dynamics of Orexin Neurons Link Sensation and Action. Sleep Problems in Narcolepsy and the Role of Hypocretin/Orexin Deficiency. Sleep, Orexin and Cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1