{"title":"泰国中低风险 STEMI 患者早期与延迟冠状动脉介入治疗的心血管效果:随机试验。","authors":"Yotsawee Chotechuang, Arintaya Phrommintikul, Srun Kuanprasert, Roungtiva Muenpa, Jayanton Patumanond, Tuanchai Chaichuen, Apichard Sukonthasarn","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2019-011201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of an early coronary intervention after streptokinase (SK) therapy in low to intermediate-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) still remains uncertain. The current study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI after successful therapy with SK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned low to intermediate Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score to patients with STEMI who had successful treatment with full-dose SK at Lampang Hospital and Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital into early and delayed coronary intervention groups. The primary endpoints were 30-day and 6-month composite cardiovascular outcomes (death, rehospitalised with acute coronary syndrome, rehospitalised with heart failure and stroke).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in our study. At the 30 days, composite cardiovascular outcomes were 4.9% in the early coronary intervention group and 2.5% in the delayed group (p=0.682). At the 6 months, the composite cardiovascular outcomes were 16.1% in the early group and 6.2% in the delayed group (p=0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The delayed coronary intervention (>24 hours) in low to intermediate STEMI after successful therapy with SK did not increase in short and long-term cardiovascular events compared with an early coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02131103.</p>","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":" ","pages":"e011201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/f6/heartasia-2019-011201.PMC6579563.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI in Thailand: a randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yotsawee Chotechuang, Arintaya Phrommintikul, Srun Kuanprasert, Roungtiva Muenpa, Jayanton Patumanond, Tuanchai Chaichuen, Apichard Sukonthasarn\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartasia-2019-011201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of an early coronary intervention after streptokinase (SK) therapy in low to intermediate-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) still remains uncertain. The current study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI after successful therapy with SK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned low to intermediate Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score to patients with STEMI who had successful treatment with full-dose SK at Lampang Hospital and Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital into early and delayed coronary intervention groups. The primary endpoints were 30-day and 6-month composite cardiovascular outcomes (death, rehospitalised with acute coronary syndrome, rehospitalised with heart failure and stroke).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in our study. At the 30 days, composite cardiovascular outcomes were 4.9% in the early coronary intervention group and 2.5% in the delayed group (p=0.682). At the 6 months, the composite cardiovascular outcomes were 16.1% in the early group and 6.2% in the delayed group (p=0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The delayed coronary intervention (>24 hours) in low to intermediate STEMI after successful therapy with SK did not increase in short and long-term cardiovascular events compared with an early coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02131103.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Asia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e011201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/f6/heartasia-2019-011201.PMC6579563.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2019-011201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2019-011201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的中低风险患者,链激酶(SK)治疗后早期冠状动脉介入治疗的益处仍不确定。本研究旨在评估 STEMI 低至中危患者使用 SK 成功治疗后,早期冠状动脉介入治疗与延迟冠状动脉介入治疗的心血管预后:我们将在南邦医院(Lampang Hospital)和清迈玛哈拉吉那空医院(Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital)成功接受全剂量SK治疗的STEMI患者随机分为早期和延迟冠状动脉介入治疗组。主要终点是30天和6个月的心血管综合结果(死亡、急性冠状动脉综合征再次住院、心力衰竭再次住院和中风):研究共纳入 162 名患者。30天后,早期冠状动脉介入治疗组的综合心血管后果为4.9%,延迟组为2.5%(P=0.682)。6个月时,早期组的心血管综合结果为16.1%,延迟组为6.2%(P=0.054):结论:与早期冠状动脉介入治疗相比,在使用SK成功治疗中低度STEMI后进行延迟冠状动脉介入治疗(>24小时)不会增加短期和长期心血管事件:NCT02131103。
Cardiovascular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI in Thailand: a randomised trial.
Background: The benefit of an early coronary intervention after streptokinase (SK) therapy in low to intermediate-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) still remains uncertain. The current study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of early versus delayed coronary intervention in low to intermediate-risk patients with STEMI after successful therapy with SK.
Methods: We randomly assigned low to intermediate Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score to patients with STEMI who had successful treatment with full-dose SK at Lampang Hospital and Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital into early and delayed coronary intervention groups. The primary endpoints were 30-day and 6-month composite cardiovascular outcomes (death, rehospitalised with acute coronary syndrome, rehospitalised with heart failure and stroke).
Results: One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in our study. At the 30 days, composite cardiovascular outcomes were 4.9% in the early coronary intervention group and 2.5% in the delayed group (p=0.682). At the 6 months, the composite cardiovascular outcomes were 16.1% in the early group and 6.2% in the delayed group (p=0.054).
Conclusions: The delayed coronary intervention (>24 hours) in low to intermediate STEMI after successful therapy with SK did not increase in short and long-term cardiovascular events compared with an early coronary intervention.