无超声经皮肌腱穿刺治疗外侧上髁炎。

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE Pub Date : 2020-06-25 Epub Date: 2019-07-06 DOI:10.2302/kjm.2019-0004-OA
Taku Suzuki, Takuji Iwamoto, Noboru Matsumura, Masaya Nakamura, Morio Matsumoto, Kazuki Sato
{"title":"无超声经皮肌腱穿刺治疗外侧上髁炎。","authors":"Taku Suzuki,&nbsp;Takuji Iwamoto,&nbsp;Noboru Matsumura,&nbsp;Masaya Nakamura,&nbsp;Morio Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kazuki Sato","doi":"10.2302/kjm.2019-0004-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous ultrasonic tendon needling has been used to treat persistent lateral epicondylitis, and its efficacy has been demonstrated. However, whether ultrasonography is necessary remains unclear. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous tendon needling without ultrasonography for lateral epicondylitis. A total of 36 patients who underwent tendon needling without ultrasonography for lateral epicondylitis were retrospectively included in the study. The tendinotic lesion was needled by fenestration approximately 20-30 times without sonographic assistance. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, the grip strength, and success rates were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The Nirschl tennis elbow score was evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the needling procedure. The mean VAS pain score and grip strength at 3, 6, and 12 months significantly improved compared to the baseline values. At 6 and 12 months, the success rates had significantly increased compared to the rates at 1 month. The mean Nirschl scores at 6 and 12 months were significantly better than the baseline value. No severe complications were observed during the study period. Percutaneous tendon needling without ultrasonography is a simple and safe technique. The procedure is effective for lateral epicondylitis that is unresponsive to conventional conservative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":46245,"journal":{"name":"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2302/kjm.2019-0004-OA","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous Tendon Needling without Ultrasonography for Lateral Epicondylitis.\",\"authors\":\"Taku Suzuki,&nbsp;Takuji Iwamoto,&nbsp;Noboru Matsumura,&nbsp;Masaya Nakamura,&nbsp;Morio Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kazuki Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.2302/kjm.2019-0004-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous ultrasonic tendon needling has been used to treat persistent lateral epicondylitis, and its efficacy has been demonstrated. However, whether ultrasonography is necessary remains unclear. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous tendon needling without ultrasonography for lateral epicondylitis. A total of 36 patients who underwent tendon needling without ultrasonography for lateral epicondylitis were retrospectively included in the study. The tendinotic lesion was needled by fenestration approximately 20-30 times without sonographic assistance. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, the grip strength, and success rates were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The Nirschl tennis elbow score was evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the needling procedure. The mean VAS pain score and grip strength at 3, 6, and 12 months significantly improved compared to the baseline values. At 6 and 12 months, the success rates had significantly increased compared to the rates at 1 month. The mean Nirschl scores at 6 and 12 months were significantly better than the baseline value. No severe complications were observed during the study period. Percutaneous tendon needling without ultrasonography is a simple and safe technique. The procedure is effective for lateral epicondylitis that is unresponsive to conventional conservative treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2302/kjm.2019-0004-OA\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2019-0004-OA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2019-0004-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

经皮超声肌腱针刺已被用于治疗持续性外上髁炎,其疗效已被证明。然而,超声检查是否必要仍不清楚。本回顾性研究的目的是评价无超声经皮肌腱针刺治疗外侧上髁炎的疗效。回顾性分析了36例未经超声检查而行肌腱针刺治疗外上髁炎的患者。在没有超声辅助的情况下,通过开窗针刺肌腱病变约20-30次。在基线和治疗后1、3、6和12个月评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、握力和成功率。在基线和针刺手术后6个月和12个月评估Nirschl网球肘评分。与基线值相比,VAS疼痛评分和握力在3、6和12个月时均有显著改善。在6个月和12个月时,与1个月时相比,成功率显著增加。6个月和12个月的平均Nirschl评分明显优于基线值。研究期间未见严重并发症。未经超声检查的经皮肌腱穿刺是一种简单、安全的方法。该手术对常规保守治疗无效的外侧上髁炎有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Percutaneous Tendon Needling without Ultrasonography for Lateral Epicondylitis.

Percutaneous ultrasonic tendon needling has been used to treat persistent lateral epicondylitis, and its efficacy has been demonstrated. However, whether ultrasonography is necessary remains unclear. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous tendon needling without ultrasonography for lateral epicondylitis. A total of 36 patients who underwent tendon needling without ultrasonography for lateral epicondylitis were retrospectively included in the study. The tendinotic lesion was needled by fenestration approximately 20-30 times without sonographic assistance. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, the grip strength, and success rates were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The Nirschl tennis elbow score was evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the needling procedure. The mean VAS pain score and grip strength at 3, 6, and 12 months significantly improved compared to the baseline values. At 6 and 12 months, the success rates had significantly increased compared to the rates at 1 month. The mean Nirschl scores at 6 and 12 months were significantly better than the baseline value. No severe complications were observed during the study period. Percutaneous tendon needling without ultrasonography is a simple and safe technique. The procedure is effective for lateral epicondylitis that is unresponsive to conventional conservative treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Intravenous Regeneration-associated Cell Transplantation Enhances Tissue Recovery in Mice with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Warfarin Therapy and Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for a Patient with Atrial Fibrillation and Antithrombin-III Deficiency. Efficacy of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Cognition in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Robotic Lobectomy with a Single Robotic Stapler from One 12-mm Port: A Multi-institutional Study. Incidence of Radiation-induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Prospective Single-institution Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1