入院乳酸浓度、乳酸变量和休克指数在诊断为休克的狗的结局评估中的应用。

Ann Marie Zollo, Ashley L Ayoob, Jennifer E Prittie, Roger D Jepson, Kenneth E Lamb, Philip R Fox
{"title":"入院乳酸浓度、乳酸变量和休克指数在诊断为休克的狗的结局评估中的应用。","authors":"Ann Marie Zollo,&nbsp;Ashley L Ayoob,&nbsp;Jennifer E Prittie,&nbsp;Roger D Jepson,&nbsp;Kenneth E Lamb,&nbsp;Philip R Fox","doi":"10.1111/vec.12868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether admission venous plasma lactate concentration, calculated lactate variables, or shock index (SI) could discriminate hospital survivors from nonsurvivors in dogs admitted with shock.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective investigation performed over a 19-month period.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large urban private teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-three dogs consecutively admitted to the ICU from January 2008 to July 2009 with initial peripheral venous plasma lactate concentration >2 mmol/L (18.0 mg/dL) and clinical and hemodynamic parameters consistent with shock.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and venous plasma lactate concentrations were serially recorded at predefined time points and used to calculate SI (SI = heart rate/systolic blood pressure) and lactate variables, including lactime (time lactate > 2.0 mmol/L), lactate clearance ([lactate<sub>initial</sub> - lactate<sub>delayed</sub> ]/lactate<sub>initial</sub> × 100), and LAC<sub>AREA</sub> (area under the lactate concentration versus time curve). Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Overall survival rate was 61%. Admission venous plasma lactate concentration did not differ between groups (P = 0.2). Lactime was shorter in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P = 0.02). Lactate clearance at 1, 10, 16, 24, and 36 hours, and final lactate clearance were greater in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P < 0.05). LAC<sub>AREA</sub> at time intervals 0-1, 1-4, 4-10, 10-16, 16-24, 24-30, and 30-36 hours was larger in nonsurvivors versus survivors (P < 0.05). Total LAC<sub>AREA</sub> did not differ between groups (P = 0.09). Admission SI and time to normalize SI (SI < 0.9) were not different between survivors and nonsurvivors (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While admission venous plasma lactate concentration could not discriminate between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors, lactate variables showed clinical utility to predict outcome in dogs with shock. Further studies are needed to determine SI reference ranges and optimal SI cut-off values to improve its prognostic ability in sick dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vec.12868","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of admission lactate concentration, lactate variables, and shock index in outcome assessment in dogs diagnosed with shock.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Marie Zollo,&nbsp;Ashley L Ayoob,&nbsp;Jennifer E Prittie,&nbsp;Roger D Jepson,&nbsp;Kenneth E Lamb,&nbsp;Philip R Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.12868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether admission venous plasma lactate concentration, calculated lactate variables, or shock index (SI) could discriminate hospital survivors from nonsurvivors in dogs admitted with shock.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective investigation performed over a 19-month period.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large urban private teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-three dogs consecutively admitted to the ICU from January 2008 to July 2009 with initial peripheral venous plasma lactate concentration >2 mmol/L (18.0 mg/dL) and clinical and hemodynamic parameters consistent with shock.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and venous plasma lactate concentrations were serially recorded at predefined time points and used to calculate SI (SI = heart rate/systolic blood pressure) and lactate variables, including lactime (time lactate > 2.0 mmol/L), lactate clearance ([lactate<sub>initial</sub> - lactate<sub>delayed</sub> ]/lactate<sub>initial</sub> × 100), and LAC<sub>AREA</sub> (area under the lactate concentration versus time curve). Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Overall survival rate was 61%. Admission venous plasma lactate concentration did not differ between groups (P = 0.2). Lactime was shorter in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P = 0.02). Lactate clearance at 1, 10, 16, 24, and 36 hours, and final lactate clearance were greater in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P < 0.05). LAC<sub>AREA</sub> at time intervals 0-1, 1-4, 4-10, 10-16, 16-24, 24-30, and 30-36 hours was larger in nonsurvivors versus survivors (P < 0.05). Total LAC<sub>AREA</sub> did not differ between groups (P = 0.09). Admission SI and time to normalize SI (SI < 0.9) were not different between survivors and nonsurvivors (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While admission venous plasma lactate concentration could not discriminate between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors, lactate variables showed clinical utility to predict outcome in dogs with shock. Further studies are needed to determine SI reference ranges and optimal SI cut-off values to improve its prognostic ability in sick dogs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vec.12868\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

目的:确定入院时静脉血浆乳酸浓度、计算乳酸变量或休克指数(SI)是否能区分住院犬的幸存者和非幸存者。设计:前瞻性调查为期19个月。环境:大型城市私立教学医院。动物:2008年1月至2009年7月连续收治23只犬,初始外周静脉血浆乳酸浓度>2 mmol/L (18.0 mg/dL),临床及血流动力学参数符合休克。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:在预定时间点连续记录心率、收缩压和静脉血浆乳酸浓度,并用于计算SI (SI =心率/收缩压)和乳酸变量,包括乳酸时间(乳酸时间> 2.0 mmol/L)、乳酸清除率([乳酸初始-乳酸延迟]/乳酸初始× 100)和LACAREA(乳酸浓度-时间曲线下面积)。主要终点是生存至出院。总生存率为61%。入院静脉血浆乳酸浓度组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.2)。幸存者的乳酸时间比非幸存者短(P = 0.02)。存活者在1、10、16、24和36小时的乳酸清除率和最终乳酸清除率高于非存活者(P < 0.05)。在0-1、1-4、4-10、10-16、16-24、24-30和30-36小时时,非幸存者的LACAREA大于幸存者(P < 0.05)。总LACAREA组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.09)。入院SI和SI正常化时间(SI < 0.9)在幸存者和非幸存者之间无差异(P > 0.05)。结论:虽然入院静脉血浆乳酸浓度不能区分住院幸存者和非幸存者,但乳酸变量在预测休克狗的预后方面具有临床应用价值。需要进一步的研究来确定SI的参考范围和最佳SI临界值,以提高其对病犬的预后能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility of admission lactate concentration, lactate variables, and shock index in outcome assessment in dogs diagnosed with shock.

Objective: To determine whether admission venous plasma lactate concentration, calculated lactate variables, or shock index (SI) could discriminate hospital survivors from nonsurvivors in dogs admitted with shock.

Design: Prospective investigation performed over a 19-month period.

Setting: Large urban private teaching hospital.

Animals: Twenty-three dogs consecutively admitted to the ICU from January 2008 to July 2009 with initial peripheral venous plasma lactate concentration >2 mmol/L (18.0 mg/dL) and clinical and hemodynamic parameters consistent with shock.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and venous plasma lactate concentrations were serially recorded at predefined time points and used to calculate SI (SI = heart rate/systolic blood pressure) and lactate variables, including lactime (time lactate > 2.0 mmol/L), lactate clearance ([lactateinitial - lactatedelayed ]/lactateinitial × 100), and LACAREA (area under the lactate concentration versus time curve). Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Overall survival rate was 61%. Admission venous plasma lactate concentration did not differ between groups (P = 0.2). Lactime was shorter in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P = 0.02). Lactate clearance at 1, 10, 16, 24, and 36 hours, and final lactate clearance were greater in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P < 0.05). LACAREA at time intervals 0-1, 1-4, 4-10, 10-16, 16-24, 24-30, and 30-36 hours was larger in nonsurvivors versus survivors (P < 0.05). Total LACAREA did not differ between groups (P = 0.09). Admission SI and time to normalize SI (SI < 0.9) were not different between survivors and nonsurvivors (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: While admission venous plasma lactate concentration could not discriminate between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors, lactate variables showed clinical utility to predict outcome in dogs with shock. Further studies are needed to determine SI reference ranges and optimal SI cut-off values to improve its prognostic ability in sick dogs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed CPR in veterinary medicine. Development and implementation of a hemovigilance program at a university veterinary teaching hospital. 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 1- Defining populations at risk. Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2021. Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2020.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1