真光束屈光度运动回顾(IMR)系统用于前列腺治疗指导的准确性评估。

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-13 DOI:10.1007/s13246-019-00760-7
Guneet Kaur, Joerg Lehmann, Peter Greer, John Simpson
{"title":"真光束屈光度运动回顾(IMR)系统用于前列腺治疗指导的准确性评估。","authors":"Guneet Kaur,&nbsp;Joerg Lehmann,&nbsp;Peter Greer,&nbsp;John Simpson","doi":"10.1007/s13246-019-00760-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intrafraction motion review (IMR), a real-time 2D, motion management feature of the Varian Truebeam™ incorporates triggered imaging, automatic fiducial marker detection and automatic beam hold. With the increasing adoption of high dose per fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) this system provides a potential means to ensure treatment accuracy. The goal of this study was therefore to investigate and quantify key performance characteristics of IMR for prostate treatment guidance. Phantom experiments were performed with a custom Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc (CIRS) pelvis phantom with implanted gold seeds and the Hexamotion™ 5D motion platform. The system accuracy was assessed statically and under typical prostate motion trajectories. The IMR functionality and marker detectability was tested under different anatomical conditions and with different imaging acquisition modes. Imaging dose for triggered imaging modes was determined using an ionisation chamber based on IPEMB dose calibration protocol for kV energies. For zero displacement, the IMR demonstrated submillimeter agreement with the known position. Similarly, dynamic motion differences between the IMR reported position and 2D trajectory displacement were within 1 mm. Static displacement in the anterior direction was reported by IMR as sinusoidal motion on the x-axis (kV angle). The 2D nature of IMR limits the ability to detect motion out of the plane of the kV image detector. Using typical clinical imaging settings, imaging dose determined at the patient surface was 2.58 mGy/frame and the corresponding IMR displayed dose was 2.63 mGy/frame. The methodology used was able to quantify the accuracy of the IMR system. The IMR was able to accurately and consistently report fiducial positions within the limitations inherent of a 2D system. IMR is fully integrated with the Truebeam system with an easy to use and efficient workflow and is clinically beneficial especially within the context of SBRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":55430,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":"42 2","pages":"585-598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13246-019-00760-7","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the accuracy of truebeam intrafraction motion review (IMR) system for prostate treatment guidance.\",\"authors\":\"Guneet Kaur,&nbsp;Joerg Lehmann,&nbsp;Peter Greer,&nbsp;John Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-019-00760-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intrafraction motion review (IMR), a real-time 2D, motion management feature of the Varian Truebeam™ incorporates triggered imaging, automatic fiducial marker detection and automatic beam hold. With the increasing adoption of high dose per fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) this system provides a potential means to ensure treatment accuracy. The goal of this study was therefore to investigate and quantify key performance characteristics of IMR for prostate treatment guidance. Phantom experiments were performed with a custom Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc (CIRS) pelvis phantom with implanted gold seeds and the Hexamotion™ 5D motion platform. The system accuracy was assessed statically and under typical prostate motion trajectories. The IMR functionality and marker detectability was tested under different anatomical conditions and with different imaging acquisition modes. Imaging dose for triggered imaging modes was determined using an ionisation chamber based on IPEMB dose calibration protocol for kV energies. For zero displacement, the IMR demonstrated submillimeter agreement with the known position. Similarly, dynamic motion differences between the IMR reported position and 2D trajectory displacement were within 1 mm. Static displacement in the anterior direction was reported by IMR as sinusoidal motion on the x-axis (kV angle). The 2D nature of IMR limits the ability to detect motion out of the plane of the kV image detector. Using typical clinical imaging settings, imaging dose determined at the patient surface was 2.58 mGy/frame and the corresponding IMR displayed dose was 2.63 mGy/frame. The methodology used was able to quantify the accuracy of the IMR system. The IMR was able to accurately and consistently report fiducial positions within the limitations inherent of a 2D system. IMR is fully integrated with the Truebeam system with an easy to use and efficient workflow and is clinically beneficial especially within the context of SBRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"585-598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13246-019-00760-7\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00760-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00760-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

偏移内运动检查(IMR)是瓦里安Truebeam™的实时2D运动管理功能,包含触发成像、自动基准标记检测和自动光束保持。随着越来越多地采用高剂量/分数立体定向放射治疗(SBRT),该系统提供了一种确保治疗准确性的潜在手段。因此,本研究的目的是调查和量化IMR的关键性能特征,以指导前列腺治疗。幻影实验采用自定义的计算机成像参考系统公司(CIRS)骨盆幻影植入金粒子和Hexamotion™5D运动平台进行。系统的精度在静态和典型前列腺运动轨迹下进行评估。在不同的解剖条件和不同的成像采集方式下,测试了IMR的功能和标记可检测性。触发成像模式的成像剂量使用基于ippemb剂量校准方案的电离室确定kV能量。对于零位移,IMR显示出与已知位置的亚毫米级一致性。同样,IMR报告位置与2D轨迹位移之间的动态运动差异在1mm以内。前方向的静态位移被IMR报告为x轴上的正弦运动(kV角)。IMR的二维特性限制了检测kV图像检测器平面外运动的能力。在典型的临床成像设置下,在患者表面确定的成像剂量为2.58 mGy/帧,相应的IMR显示剂量为2.63 mGy/帧。所使用的方法能够量化IMR系统的准确性。在2D系统固有的限制下,IMR能够准确和一致地报告基准位置。IMR与Truebeam系统完全集成,具有易于使用和高效的工作流程,特别是在SBRT的背景下,在临床上是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the accuracy of truebeam intrafraction motion review (IMR) system for prostate treatment guidance.

Intrafraction motion review (IMR), a real-time 2D, motion management feature of the Varian Truebeam™ incorporates triggered imaging, automatic fiducial marker detection and automatic beam hold. With the increasing adoption of high dose per fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) this system provides a potential means to ensure treatment accuracy. The goal of this study was therefore to investigate and quantify key performance characteristics of IMR for prostate treatment guidance. Phantom experiments were performed with a custom Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc (CIRS) pelvis phantom with implanted gold seeds and the Hexamotion™ 5D motion platform. The system accuracy was assessed statically and under typical prostate motion trajectories. The IMR functionality and marker detectability was tested under different anatomical conditions and with different imaging acquisition modes. Imaging dose for triggered imaging modes was determined using an ionisation chamber based on IPEMB dose calibration protocol for kV energies. For zero displacement, the IMR demonstrated submillimeter agreement with the known position. Similarly, dynamic motion differences between the IMR reported position and 2D trajectory displacement were within 1 mm. Static displacement in the anterior direction was reported by IMR as sinusoidal motion on the x-axis (kV angle). The 2D nature of IMR limits the ability to detect motion out of the plane of the kV image detector. Using typical clinical imaging settings, imaging dose determined at the patient surface was 2.58 mGy/frame and the corresponding IMR displayed dose was 2.63 mGy/frame. The methodology used was able to quantify the accuracy of the IMR system. The IMR was able to accurately and consistently report fiducial positions within the limitations inherent of a 2D system. IMR is fully integrated with the Truebeam system with an easy to use and efficient workflow and is clinically beneficial especially within the context of SBRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (APESM) is a multidisciplinary forum for information and research on the application of physics and engineering to medicine and human physiology. APESM covers a broad range of topics that include but is not limited to: - Medical physics in radiotherapy - Medical physics in diagnostic radiology - Medical physics in nuclear medicine - Mathematical modelling applied to medicine and human biology - Clinical biomedical engineering - Feature extraction, classification of EEG, ECG, EMG, EOG, and other biomedical signals; - Medical imaging - contributions to new and improved methods; - Modelling of physiological systems - Image processing to extract information from images, e.g. fMRI, CT, etc.; - Biomechanics, especially with applications to orthopaedics. - Nanotechnology in medicine APESM offers original reviews, scientific papers, scientific notes, technical papers, educational notes, book reviews and letters to the editor. APESM is the journal of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, and also the official journal of the College of Biomedical Engineers, Engineers Australia and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgment of Reviewers for Volume 35 Acknowledgment of Reviewers for Volume 34 A comparison between EPSON V700 and EPSON V800 scanners for film dosimetry. Nanodosimetric understanding to the dependence of the relationship between dose-averaged lineal energy on nanoscale and LET on ion species. EPSM 2019, Engineering and Physical Sciences in Medicine : 28-30 October 2019, Perth, Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1