{"title":"幻想还是精神错乱?","authors":"A. Peskine ,&nbsp;P. Bruguière ,&nbsp;C. Picq ,&nbsp;P. Pradat-Diehl","doi":"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Confabulations are inaccurate narratives purporting to convey information about the world or the self. Fantastic utterances from brain-injured patients are difficult to interpret as confabulation or delusion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Starting from two clinical observations, we analyse the terms “spontaneous confabulations” and “delusion”.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two brain-injured patients presented with fantastic utterances; the adhesion was complete for both patients. They also suffered from amnesic and executive disorders. Clinical interviews with neuropsychologist and psychopathologist could not distinct between spontaneaous confabulations and delusion.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Neuropsychological interpretations of spontaneous confabulations are (1) the deficient strategic retrieval process arising from executive failures and (2) confusion of the temporal order of information within memory. These hypotheses cannot explain the fantastic utterances described. Are spontaneous fantastic confabulations a specific entity or did these patients present a morbid association of neurological and psychiatric disorders? Fantastic confabulations are very scarcely described and the association of neurological and psychiatric impairments enables us to better describe the clinical observations. Spontaneous confabulations reported after amnesic and executive disorders are indeed typically composed of the patient's past experiences and do not usually comprehend fantastic utterances.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neurological and psychological analyses of the fantastic utterances from two brain-injured patients do not respond to the definition of spontaneous confabulation. Fantastic confabulations are a rare entity and we propose another explanation consisting of the association of neurological and psychiatric disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72206,"journal":{"name":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","volume":"51 6","pages":"Pages 501-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.05.005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confabulations fantastiques ou délire ?\",\"authors\":\"A. Peskine ,&nbsp;P. Bruguière ,&nbsp;C. Picq ,&nbsp;P. Pradat-Diehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Confabulations are inaccurate narratives purporting to convey information about the world or the self. Fantastic utterances from brain-injured patients are difficult to interpret as confabulation or delusion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Starting from two clinical observations, we analyse the terms “spontaneous confabulations” and “delusion”.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two brain-injured patients presented with fantastic utterances; the adhesion was complete for both patients. They also suffered from amnesic and executive disorders. Clinical interviews with neuropsychologist and psychopathologist could not distinct between spontaneaous confabulations and delusion.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Neuropsychological interpretations of spontaneous confabulations are (1) the deficient strategic retrieval process arising from executive failures and (2) confusion of the temporal order of information within memory. These hypotheses cannot explain the fantastic utterances described. Are spontaneous fantastic confabulations a specific entity or did these patients present a morbid association of neurological and psychiatric disorders? Fantastic confabulations are very scarcely described and the association of neurological and psychiatric impairments enables us to better describe the clinical observations. Spontaneous confabulations reported after amnesic and executive disorders are indeed typically composed of the patient's past experiences and do not usually comprehend fantastic utterances.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neurological and psychological analyses of the fantastic utterances from two brain-injured patients do not respond to the definition of spontaneous confabulation. Fantastic confabulations are a rare entity and we propose another explanation consisting of the association of neurological and psychiatric disorders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 501-505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.05.005\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168605408000901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168605408000901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虚构故事是不准确的叙述,旨在传达关于世界或自我的信息。脑损伤患者的荒诞话语很难被解释为虚构或妄想。方法从两次临床观察出发,对“自发虚构”和“妄想”进行分析。结果2例颅脑损伤患者言语异常;两例患者粘连完全。他们还患有健忘症和执行障碍。与神经心理学家和精神病理学家的临床访谈无法区分自发性虚构和妄想。自发虚构的神经心理学解释是:(1)由执行失败引起的战略检索过程缺陷;(2)记忆中信息的时间顺序混乱。这些假设不能解释所描述的奇异话语。自发性幻想是一种特殊的实体,还是这些患者表现出神经和精神疾病的病态联系?奇妙的虚构很少被描述,神经和精神损伤的联系使我们能够更好地描述临床观察。失忆症和执行障碍后报告的自发虚构确实典型地由患者过去的经历组成,通常不能理解奇异的话语。结论对2例脑损伤患者的荒诞话语的神经学和心理学分析不符合自发性虚构的定义。奇妙的虚构是一种罕见的实体,我们提出了另一种解释,包括神经和精神疾病的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Confabulations fantastiques ou délire ?

Introduction

Confabulations are inaccurate narratives purporting to convey information about the world or the self. Fantastic utterances from brain-injured patients are difficult to interpret as confabulation or delusion.

Methods

Starting from two clinical observations, we analyse the terms “spontaneous confabulations” and “delusion”.

Results

Two brain-injured patients presented with fantastic utterances; the adhesion was complete for both patients. They also suffered from amnesic and executive disorders. Clinical interviews with neuropsychologist and psychopathologist could not distinct between spontaneaous confabulations and delusion.

Discussion

Neuropsychological interpretations of spontaneous confabulations are (1) the deficient strategic retrieval process arising from executive failures and (2) confusion of the temporal order of information within memory. These hypotheses cannot explain the fantastic utterances described. Are spontaneous fantastic confabulations a specific entity or did these patients present a morbid association of neurological and psychiatric disorders? Fantastic confabulations are very scarcely described and the association of neurological and psychiatric impairments enables us to better describe the clinical observations. Spontaneous confabulations reported after amnesic and executive disorders are indeed typically composed of the patient's past experiences and do not usually comprehend fantastic utterances.

Conclusion

Neurological and psychological analyses of the fantastic utterances from two brain-injured patients do not respond to the definition of spontaneous confabulation. Fantastic confabulations are a rare entity and we propose another explanation consisting of the association of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Le devenir fonctionnel et la qualité de vie des ruptures de la coiffe des rotateurs non opérées Apport de l’arthrodistension dans la prise en charge de la capsulite rétractile primitive de l’épaule : étude comparative versus rééducation Arthropathie neurogène de la charnière lombosacrée chez un paraplégique : à propos d’un cas European physical and rehabilitation medicine journals in concert: A European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM) initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1