肺切除术后呼吸物理治疗的效果:系统评价方案

Karoline Stentoft Andersen , Birgit Skoffer , Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard , Maurits Van Tulder , Annemette Krintel Petersen
{"title":"肺切除术后呼吸物理治疗的效果:系统评价方案","authors":"Karoline Stentoft Andersen ,&nbsp;Birgit Skoffer ,&nbsp;Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard ,&nbsp;Maurits Van Tulder ,&nbsp;Annemette Krintel Petersen","doi":"10.1016/j.isjp.2017.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The main treatment of lung cancer (stage 1 and 2) is lung resection surgery. The risk of postoperative pulmonary complications is high and therefore standard postoperative care involves respiratory physiotherapy. The purpose of this systematic review is to create an overview of the evidence on respiratory physiotherapy after lung resection surgery on mortality rate (within 30<!--> <!-->days) and postoperative pulmonary complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and analysis</h3><p>The review will include randomized or quasi-randomized controlled studies investigating the effect of all types of respiratory physiotherapy on mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery. Furthermore, the effect of respiratory physiotherapy is evaluated on secondary outcomes such as length of hospital stay, lung volumes and function, and adverse events. The method of the planned review is described in this paper. The literature search will include the databases PubMed, Cochrane (Central), Embase, Cinahl and PEDro. The literature search is being performed in 2017. If meta-analyses are not undertaken, a narrative synthesis of the available data will be provided. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO on the 10th of October 2016 (registration number CRD42016048956).</p></div><div><h3>Ethics and dissemination</h3><p>Conclusion of this systematic review is expected available in the second half of 2017.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.isjp.2017.03.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of respiratory physiotherapy after lung resection: Protocol for a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Karoline Stentoft Andersen ,&nbsp;Birgit Skoffer ,&nbsp;Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard ,&nbsp;Maurits Van Tulder ,&nbsp;Annemette Krintel Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.isjp.2017.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The main treatment of lung cancer (stage 1 and 2) is lung resection surgery. The risk of postoperative pulmonary complications is high and therefore standard postoperative care involves respiratory physiotherapy. The purpose of this systematic review is to create an overview of the evidence on respiratory physiotherapy after lung resection surgery on mortality rate (within 30<!--> <!-->days) and postoperative pulmonary complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and analysis</h3><p>The review will include randomized or quasi-randomized controlled studies investigating the effect of all types of respiratory physiotherapy on mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery. Furthermore, the effect of respiratory physiotherapy is evaluated on secondary outcomes such as length of hospital stay, lung volumes and function, and adverse events. The method of the planned review is described in this paper. The literature search will include the databases PubMed, Cochrane (Central), Embase, Cinahl and PEDro. The literature search is being performed in 2017. If meta-analyses are not undertaken, a narrative synthesis of the available data will be provided. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO on the 10th of October 2016 (registration number CRD42016048956).</p></div><div><h3>Ethics and dissemination</h3><p>Conclusion of this systematic review is expected available in the second half of 2017.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery Protocols\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.isjp.2017.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468357417300049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468357417300049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景肺癌(1期和2期)的主要治疗方法是肺切除术。术后肺部并发症的风险很高,因此标准的术后护理包括呼吸物理治疗。本系统综述的目的是概述肺切除术后呼吸物理治疗对死亡率(30天内)和术后肺部并发症的影响。方法和分析本综述将包括随机或准随机对照研究,调查各种类型的呼吸物理治疗对肺切除术后死亡率和术后肺部并发症的影响。此外,呼吸物理治疗的效果评估的次要结局,如住院时间,肺容量和功能,以及不良事件。本文介绍了计划评审的方法。文献检索将包括PubMed、Cochrane (Central)、Embase、Cinahl和PEDro数据库。文献检索在2017年进行。如果不进行元分析,将提供对现有数据的叙述综合。该协议于2016年10月10日在普洛斯彼罗注册(注册号CRD42016048956)。伦理和传播本系统评价的结论预计将于2017年下半年公布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of respiratory physiotherapy after lung resection: Protocol for a systematic review

Background

The main treatment of lung cancer (stage 1 and 2) is lung resection surgery. The risk of postoperative pulmonary complications is high and therefore standard postoperative care involves respiratory physiotherapy. The purpose of this systematic review is to create an overview of the evidence on respiratory physiotherapy after lung resection surgery on mortality rate (within 30 days) and postoperative pulmonary complications.

Methods and analysis

The review will include randomized or quasi-randomized controlled studies investigating the effect of all types of respiratory physiotherapy on mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery. Furthermore, the effect of respiratory physiotherapy is evaluated on secondary outcomes such as length of hospital stay, lung volumes and function, and adverse events. The method of the planned review is described in this paper. The literature search will include the databases PubMed, Cochrane (Central), Embase, Cinahl and PEDro. The literature search is being performed in 2017. If meta-analyses are not undertaken, a narrative synthesis of the available data will be provided. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO on the 10th of October 2016 (registration number CRD42016048956).

Ethics and dissemination

Conclusion of this systematic review is expected available in the second half of 2017.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
The association of breast surgery ASPIRE: breast pain pathway rapid evaluation project - study protocol. The MARECA (national study of management of breast cancer locoregional recurrence and oncological outcomes) study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Artificial intelligence-enabled ophthalmoscopy for papilledema: a systematic review protocol. Protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in patients with refractory ascites after liver resection: an open-label, single-arm phase I/II study A new minimally invasive, nonexcisional, surgical browlift technique with minimal scarring: a protocol for a prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1