腹腔镜腹膜外疝修补术中非固定和永久性钉扎固定的中短期疗效比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal Pub Date : 2019-09-16 eCollection Date: 2019-10-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_47_18
Chi-Wen Lo, Yao-Chou Tsai, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang, Cheng-Hsing Hsieh, Shang-Jen Chang
{"title":"腹腔镜腹膜外疝修补术中非固定和永久性钉扎固定的中短期疗效比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chi-Wen Lo, Yao-Chou Tsai, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang, Cheng-Hsing Hsieh, Shang-Jen Chang","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_47_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature and pooled data for a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of mesh fixation and nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search of PubMed<sup>®</sup> and a Cochrane review for all randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and complications of mesh fixation versus nonfixation in TEP hernia repair. The evaluated outcomes included perioperative (operative time and conversion rate) and postoperative parameters (pain scores, duration of hospital stay, surgical complications including seroma, delayed return of bladder function, chronic pain, and recurrence). Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager Software (RevMan<sup>®</sup>, version 5.2.6) was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in a pooled analysis. In total, 1099 patients (1467 hernias) had received TEP hernia repair (748 and 719 hernia defects in the nonfixation and fixation groups, respectively). The nonfixation group required shorter operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -2.36 min, <i>P</i> = 0.0006) and had less pain on postoperative day 1 (WMD = -0.44, <i>P</i> = 0.04) than the fixation group. No significant differences were observed between groups with regard to conversion rate, hospital stay, recurrence rate, or complication rate. However, the incidence of postoperative urine retention was higher in the fixation group (odds ratio = 0.26, <i>P</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with a nonrecurrent uncomplicated hernia defect with the size <3 cm, nonfixation yielded comparable efficacy with mesh fixation, but less short-term postoperative pain, and a lower risk of urine retention. In addition, the nonfixation method involved a shorter operative time and lower costs. However, no difference in the incidence of chronic pain was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72593,"journal":{"name":"Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal","volume":"31 4","pages":"244-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/89/TCMJ-31-244.PMC6905242.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of short- to mid-term efficacy of nonfixation and permanent tack fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chi-Wen Lo, Yao-Chou Tsai, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang, Cheng-Hsing Hsieh, Shang-Jen Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_47_18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature and pooled data for a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of mesh fixation and nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search of PubMed<sup>®</sup> and a Cochrane review for all randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and complications of mesh fixation versus nonfixation in TEP hernia repair. The evaluated outcomes included perioperative (operative time and conversion rate) and postoperative parameters (pain scores, duration of hospital stay, surgical complications including seroma, delayed return of bladder function, chronic pain, and recurrence). Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager Software (RevMan<sup>®</sup>, version 5.2.6) was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in a pooled analysis. In total, 1099 patients (1467 hernias) had received TEP hernia repair (748 and 719 hernia defects in the nonfixation and fixation groups, respectively). The nonfixation group required shorter operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -2.36 min, <i>P</i> = 0.0006) and had less pain on postoperative day 1 (WMD = -0.44, <i>P</i> = 0.04) than the fixation group. No significant differences were observed between groups with regard to conversion rate, hospital stay, recurrence rate, or complication rate. However, the incidence of postoperative urine retention was higher in the fixation group (odds ratio = 0.26, <i>P</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with a nonrecurrent uncomplicated hernia defect with the size <3 cm, nonfixation yielded comparable efficacy with mesh fixation, but less short-term postoperative pain, and a lower risk of urine retention. In addition, the nonfixation method involved a shorter operative time and lower costs. However, no difference in the incidence of chronic pain was observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"244-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/89/TCMJ-31-244.PMC6905242.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_47_18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_47_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们系统地回顾了文献和荟萃分析的汇总数据,以比较腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术中网状物固定和非固定的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:我们对PubMed®进行了系统检索,并对所有随机对照试验进行了Cochrane综述,这些试验比较了网状物固定与非固定在TEP疝修补术中的疗效和并发症。评估结果包括围手术期(手术时间和转化率)和术后参数(疼痛评分、住院时间、手术并发症(包括浆膜瘤)、膀胱功能延迟恢复、慢性疼痛和复发)。Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager软件(RevMan®,5.2.6版)用于统计分析。结果:10项试验符合纳入标准,并纳入汇总分析。总共有1099名患者(1467例疝)接受了TEP疝修补术(非固定组和固定组分别有748例和719例疝缺损)。与固定组相比,非固定组需要更短的手术时间(加权平均差[MWMD]=-2.36分钟,P=0.0006),术后第1天的疼痛更少(WMD=-0.44,P=0.04)。在转化率、住院时间、复发率或并发症发生率方面,两组之间没有观察到显著差异。然而,固定组术后尿潴留的发生率更高(比值比=0.26,P=0.03)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of short- to mid-term efficacy of nonfixation and permanent tack fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: We systematically reviewed the literature and pooled data for a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of mesh fixation and nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.

Materials and methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed® and a Cochrane review for all randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and complications of mesh fixation versus nonfixation in TEP hernia repair. The evaluated outcomes included perioperative (operative time and conversion rate) and postoperative parameters (pain scores, duration of hospital stay, surgical complications including seroma, delayed return of bladder function, chronic pain, and recurrence). Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager Software (RevMan®, version 5.2.6) was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Ten trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in a pooled analysis. In total, 1099 patients (1467 hernias) had received TEP hernia repair (748 and 719 hernia defects in the nonfixation and fixation groups, respectively). The nonfixation group required shorter operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -2.36 min, P = 0.0006) and had less pain on postoperative day 1 (WMD = -0.44, P = 0.04) than the fixation group. No significant differences were observed between groups with regard to conversion rate, hospital stay, recurrence rate, or complication rate. However, the incidence of postoperative urine retention was higher in the fixation group (odds ratio = 0.26, P = 0.03).

Conclusion: For patients with a nonrecurrent uncomplicated hernia defect with the size <3 cm, nonfixation yielded comparable efficacy with mesh fixation, but less short-term postoperative pain, and a lower risk of urine retention. In addition, the nonfixation method involved a shorter operative time and lower costs. However, no difference in the incidence of chronic pain was observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dancing pharynx. Prevalence and correlates of antenatal depression among women registered at antenatal clinic in North India. Targeting of interleukin-10 receptor by a potential human interleukin-10 peptide efficiently blocks interleukin-10 pathway-dependent cell proliferation. Association of bone mineral density and trabecular bone score with cardiovascular disease. Is there a role for oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in age-associated bladder disorders?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1