不相关免疫球蛋白样β-三明治蛋白的共享展开途径。

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Protein Engineering Design & Selection Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI:10.1093/protein/gzz040
Rudesh D Toofanny, Sara Calhoun, Amanda L Jonsson, Valerie Daggett
{"title":"不相关免疫球蛋白样β-三明治蛋白的共享展开途径。","authors":"Rudesh D Toofanny,&nbsp;Sara Calhoun,&nbsp;Amanda L Jonsson,&nbsp;Valerie Daggett","doi":"10.1093/protein/gzz040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Dynameomics project contains native state and unfolding simulations of 807 protein domains, where each domain is representative of a different metafold; these metafolds encompass ~97% of protein fold space. There is a long-standing question in structural biology as to whether proteins in the same fold family share the same folding/unfolding characteristics. Using molecular dynamics simulations from the Dynameomics project, we conducted a detailed study of protein unfolding/folding pathways for 5 protein domains from the immunoglobulin (Ig)-like β-sandwich metafold (the highest ranked metafold in our database). The domains have sequence similarities ranging from 4 to 15% and are all from different SCOP superfamilies, yet they share the same overall Ig-like topology. Despite having very different amino acid sequences, the dominant unfolding pathway is very similar for the 5 proteins, and the secondary structures that are peripheral to the aligned, shared core domain add variability to the unfolding pathway. Aligned residues in the core domain display consensus structure in the transition state primarily through conservation of hydrophobic positions. Commonalities in the obligate folding nucleus indicate that insights into the major events in the folding/unfolding of other domains from this metafold may be obtainable from unfolding simulations of a few representative proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":54543,"journal":{"name":"Protein Engineering Design & Selection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/protein/gzz040","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared unfolding pathways of unrelated immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins.\",\"authors\":\"Rudesh D Toofanny,&nbsp;Sara Calhoun,&nbsp;Amanda L Jonsson,&nbsp;Valerie Daggett\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/protein/gzz040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Dynameomics project contains native state and unfolding simulations of 807 protein domains, where each domain is representative of a different metafold; these metafolds encompass ~97% of protein fold space. There is a long-standing question in structural biology as to whether proteins in the same fold family share the same folding/unfolding characteristics. Using molecular dynamics simulations from the Dynameomics project, we conducted a detailed study of protein unfolding/folding pathways for 5 protein domains from the immunoglobulin (Ig)-like β-sandwich metafold (the highest ranked metafold in our database). The domains have sequence similarities ranging from 4 to 15% and are all from different SCOP superfamilies, yet they share the same overall Ig-like topology. Despite having very different amino acid sequences, the dominant unfolding pathway is very similar for the 5 proteins, and the secondary structures that are peripheral to the aligned, shared core domain add variability to the unfolding pathway. Aligned residues in the core domain display consensus structure in the transition state primarily through conservation of hydrophobic positions. Commonalities in the obligate folding nucleus indicate that insights into the major events in the folding/unfolding of other domains from this metafold may be obtainable from unfolding simulations of a few representative proteins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Protein Engineering Design & Selection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/protein/gzz040\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Protein Engineering Design & Selection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzz040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protein Engineering Design & Selection","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzz040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Dynameomics项目包含807个蛋白质结构域的原生状态和展开模拟,其中每个结构域代表不同的元折叠;这些元折叠约占蛋白质折叠空间的97%。在结构生物学中有一个长期存在的问题,即相同折叠家族中的蛋白质是否具有相同的折叠/展开特征。利用Dynameomics项目的分子动力学模拟,我们对免疫球蛋白(Ig)样β-三明治元折叠(我们数据库中排名最高的元折叠)中5个蛋白质结构域的蛋白质展开/折叠途径进行了详细研究。这些结构域的序列相似性从4%到15%不等,它们都来自不同的SCOP超家族,但它们具有相同的整体类ig拓扑结构。尽管这5种蛋白质的氨基酸序列非常不同,但主要的展开途径非常相似,并且位于排列的共享核心结构域外围的二级结构增加了展开途径的可变性。核心结构域的对齐残基主要通过疏水位置的守恒在过渡态中显示一致结构。专性折叠核的共性表明,通过对一些具有代表性的蛋白质的展开模拟,可以深入了解该元折叠中其他结构域折叠/展开的主要事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shared unfolding pathways of unrelated immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins.

The Dynameomics project contains native state and unfolding simulations of 807 protein domains, where each domain is representative of a different metafold; these metafolds encompass ~97% of protein fold space. There is a long-standing question in structural biology as to whether proteins in the same fold family share the same folding/unfolding characteristics. Using molecular dynamics simulations from the Dynameomics project, we conducted a detailed study of protein unfolding/folding pathways for 5 protein domains from the immunoglobulin (Ig)-like β-sandwich metafold (the highest ranked metafold in our database). The domains have sequence similarities ranging from 4 to 15% and are all from different SCOP superfamilies, yet they share the same overall Ig-like topology. Despite having very different amino acid sequences, the dominant unfolding pathway is very similar for the 5 proteins, and the secondary structures that are peripheral to the aligned, shared core domain add variability to the unfolding pathway. Aligned residues in the core domain display consensus structure in the transition state primarily through conservation of hydrophobic positions. Commonalities in the obligate folding nucleus indicate that insights into the major events in the folding/unfolding of other domains from this metafold may be obtainable from unfolding simulations of a few representative proteins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Protein Engineering Design & Selection
Protein Engineering Design & Selection 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Protein Engineering, Design and Selection (PEDS) publishes high-quality research papers and review articles relevant to the engineering, design and selection of proteins for use in biotechnology and therapy, and for understanding the fundamental link between protein sequence, structure, dynamics, function, and evolution.
期刊最新文献
TIMED-Design: flexible and accessible protein sequence design with convolutional neural networks. Correction to: De novo design of a polycarbonate hydrolase. Interactive computational and experimental approaches improve the sensitivity of periplasmic binding protein-based nicotine biosensors for measurements in biofluids. Design of functional intrinsically disordered proteins. The shortest path method (SPM) webserver for computational enzyme design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1